Reviewed:
Normally, I don't like really short stories. I also don't normally like stories that are incorrectly coded, or 'cheating' stories.
In spite of all that, I really didn't dislike this story. It was over before it had a chance to grow on me, the missing code - while being a code I typically avoid - turned out to be not such a big deal this time, because/and the 'cheatee' wasn't actually in the story... so the 'cheat' aspect didn't bother me so much. (Typically, 'cheat' is one of my squicks. Whether that affected my scoring, I doubt... that's why I've explained this part so much.)
Now, beyond all that: the shortness was an issue for me. The story never had a chance to draw me in; the characters were just indistinct blurs; and, the errors weren't surrounded by enough error-free writing to balance them out. Technically, too, I had to dock the story for being incorrectly coded.
There was little to no plot, as this was just a scene rather than a story... but the author claimed only that this was a stroke piece, not that there was a plot: thus, I didn't bother rating the plot.
The stoke score should be taken as a rough guide to the quantity of sexual activity in the piece, rather than an indication of how 'hot' it was. The lack of any vivid descriptions, and the laconic style to the piece, really made the sex rather bland.
Those looking for any sort of a plot will want to look elsewhere, as will anyone looking for really 'hot', intense, stroke material. Anyone who just wants to read something quick and different might enjoy this piece.