Home ยป Forum ยป Story Recommendations

Forum: Story Recommendations

Caligula

Jedd11 ๐Ÿšซ

OK, for what it's worth, I truly think Caligula is a story waiting to be written. I've seen several stories of historical fiction here, and enjoyed them all. And there's many instances of scandalous sexual events throughout history that would make good tales, and I'm sure they'd all be great. Cleopatra, Nero, Catherine the Great, Daniel Boone, Fatty Arbuckle, Oscar Wilde, all would be good reads. But man, Caligula almost writes itself. A psychopath who as Caesar ran rampant through the Senate. Appropriating their wealth. Beating and murdering them. Having sex with their wives and daughters in front of them at feasts. Yet he was major over with the working classes as he included him in so many things such as feasts and gladiatorial events. Plus he fucked all three of his sisters, even falling in love with the youngest, Drusilla. Another, Agrippina the Younger not only fucked him, her brother, but her uncle and her son, but that's another story. Anyway, just throwing it out there in hopes someone picks it up.

Jedd11 ๐Ÿšซ

@Jedd11

Well, I'm a dumbass and/or dont pay attention, but this should have went into story ideas.

Michael Loucks ๐Ÿšซ

@Jedd11

There have been a couple of movies and a TV series:

Movie - Caligula (1979)
Movie Caligula (1996)
TV - Caligula (2018)

The 1979 movie could be classified as porn.

Dominions Son ๐Ÿšซ

@Michael Loucks

I'm sure there are any number of dead tree books about Caligula at least some of which could be classed as erotica/porn.

StarFleet Carl ๐Ÿšซ

@Michael Loucks

The 1979 movie could be classified as porn.

Not could be ... was / is.

I may have the uncut version on my computer. Allegedly, the orgy scenes were added later. Don't think so, and there's more than enough explicit blowjobs and other sex in those to get it classified as porn.

Replies:   Grey Wolf  DBActive
Grey Wolf ๐Ÿšซ

@StarFleet Carl

It was an attempt at combining art with porn. Not the best attempt, but an attempt.

In my opinion, the stars mostly do a decent job with the material and direction they were given. Unfortunately, you get a case where the original writer repudiated the director's vision and the director repudiated what the producer did with the film after it was handed off, so... yeah.

So much wasted potential all around.

Replies:   Tw0Cr0ws
Tw0Cr0ws ๐Ÿšซ

@Grey Wolf

Another of the directors was also the producer Bob Guccione (Penthouse magazine). Since they knew who he was before filming started it would be hard to believe that they had no idea what the end result would be.

DBActive ๐Ÿšซ

@StarFleet Carl

The porn scenes weren't added later. They were filmed by Guccione after the the legit crew left the set for the day so the set matched the legit scenes. He then had the final cut on the film and inserted the porn a seamlessly as possible. He did not do a good job of it. Someone with access to the raw footage and modern editing tools could do a much better job.

Replies:   StarFleet Carl
StarFleet Carl ๐Ÿšซ

@DBActive

The porn scenes weren't added later.

I wouldn't necessarily class the scene where Malcolm McDowell rapes a new bride, then sticks his hand into butter and anally rapes the groom as wholesome, either. There's no way that Peter O'Toole or Sir John Gielgud could claim they weren't working on something not intensely sexual with the bathing scene of all the 'little fishies', since they were in the scene with all those naked women and men, plus the three tiered sex tower that O'Toole had.

Replies:   DBActive  Mushroom  Grey Wolf
DBActive ๐Ÿšซ
Updated:

@StarFleet Carl

Sure = but those scenes weren't the hardcore stuff. This isn't a secret - Guccione publicly bragged about it.

But you are right that Guccione did go back after filming ended to shoot the hardcore scenes. I was wrong about that.

Mushroom ๐Ÿšซ

@StarFleet Carl

I wouldn't necessarily class the scene where Malcolm McDowell rapes a new bride, then sticks his hand into butter and anally rapes the groom as wholesome, either. There's no way that Peter O'Toole or Sir John Gielgud could claim they weren't working on something not intensely sexual with the bathing scene of all the 'little fishies', since they were in the scene with all those naked women and men, plus the three tiered sex tower that O'Toole had.

And they are mostly known for acting in the UK.

The UK started showing nudity on the BBC in the 1960's. Even "I, Claudius" (1976) had nudity, and was even broadcast that way in the US (PBS has relaxed broadcast more in keeping with the BBC than other broadcast stations).

So for them to see nudity in a British production, would not have been a big deal. Remember, Malcom was also in "A Clockwork Orange", not exactly a "family friendly movie".

Replies:   DBActive
DBActive ๐Ÿšซ

@Mushroom

Nudity was also extremely common in US movie productions from the second half of the 60s. I read an article somewhere a few years ago that studied the issue and there was much more nudity in the top 100 grossing films then than now.

Replies:   Mushroom  bk69
Mushroom ๐Ÿšซ

@DBActive

Nudity was also extremely common in US movie productions from the second half of the 60s. I read an article somewhere a few years ago that studied the issue and there was much more nudity in the top 100 grossing films then than now.

True, but the BBC (and PBS) were broadcast television.

There was quite a to-do in the 1970's when Masterpiece Theater was presenting unedited original BBC productions, nudity and all. I knew more than a few kids who watched it back in the day, just for the occasional boob shots *laugh*

Of course, that was in the era before Skinemax and streaming porn.

Replies:   DBActive
DBActive ๐Ÿšซ

@Mushroom

I agree, but this wasn't broadcast TV.

bk69 ๐Ÿšซ

@DBActive

there was much more nudity in the top 100 grossing films then than now.

How many Disney kids' movies were on the 100 then compared to now?

Replies:   DBActive
DBActive ๐Ÿšซ

@bk69

About the same as now. It was the top 100 per year, not all time.

Replies:   bk69
bk69 ๐Ÿšซ

@DBActive

Yeah, I just figured that there's likely been a shift in the movie-going demographic over the years, such that the young'ns would likely make up a bigger target audience.
Outside the occasional blockbusters, how many movies really bring in the audience like the kids movies do?

Grey Wolf ๐Ÿšซ

@StarFleet Carl

There's no way that Peter O'Toole or Sir John Gielgud could claim they weren't working on something not intensely sexual [...]

While the sources are debatable (as it was common in Roman culture to level charges related to sex as part of political attacks), if one is telling the story of Caligula according to what sources we do have, it'd be difficult to avoid there being a lot of sex, nor to have it not be fairly extreme.

As was noted elsewhere, Malcolm McDowell was no stranger to portrayals of sex and violence, which made him a great choice for the role.

Replies:   bk69  Mushroom
bk69 ๐Ÿšซ

@Grey Wolf

Malcolm McDowell was no stranger to portrayals of sex and violence,

YM 'ultraviolence'

Mushroom ๐Ÿšซ

@Grey Wolf

While the sources are debatable (as it was common in Roman culture to level charges related to sex as part of political attacks), if one is telling the story of Caligula according to what sources we do have, it'd be difficult to avoid there being a lot of sex, nor to have it not be fairly extreme.

As was noted elsewhere, Malcolm McDowell was no stranger to portrayals of sex and violence, which made him a great choice for the role.

Admittedly, a lot of the legacies of many emperors are distorted. But especially the end of the Julian Dynasty. But in many ways, Elagabalus was probably the worst in that regard.

While many question the accuracy of charges against Caligula about incest, few deny that Elagabalus was a sick individual. Even his own grandmother tried to have him killed.

Jedd11 ๐Ÿšซ

@Michael Loucks

Yeah, saw the 1979 movie, and it was absolutely porn. It even had a couple legit actors who went on to be pretty big stars, Roddy McDowell and Helen Mirren. Nkt a bad movie. I was actually suggesting it for a story though, thus the reason I commented on my own post. I should have put it under story ideas, but dont know how to transfer it. I appreciate all the comments from everyone though. And as a side note, have read your AWLL story, and some of your comments. Couldnt agree more with your age of consent opinion. How in the world we have 18 as the age in our collective national mind, when it is only 18 in eleven states is beyond me. This means it is less than 18 in thirty nine states, and really in most of the world. SMH.

Replies:   Dominions Son  DBActive
Dominions Son ๐Ÿšซ

@Jedd11

How in the world we have 18 as the age in our collective national mind, when it is only 18 in eleven states is beyond me.

Because 18 is the age used in Federal law for the definition of child pornography.

DBActive ๐Ÿšซ

@Jedd11

How in the world we have 18 as the age in our collective national mind, when it is only 18 in eleven states is beyond me. This means it is less than 18 in thirty nine states, and really in most of the world. SMH.

Because most TV shows and movies are developed in California where the age of consent is 18.

Replies:   Dominions Son
Dominions Son ๐Ÿšซ
Updated:

@DBActive

Because most TV shows and movies are developed in California where the age of consent is 18

Has more to do with the Federal child pornography laws. Because of the federal laws, TV and movies have to be very careful about showing people under 18 in sexual situations. Because this is federal law, moving out of California wouldn't help.

Replies:   DBActive
DBActive ๐Ÿšซ
Updated:

@Dominions Son

No. The 18 year old idea long preceded the child porn laws and is directly related to the California laws. That's where almost all TV cop/lawyer shows were set until the Law and Order franchise. On the L&O shows set in NYC they always use the 17 year age of consent from NY law.

Argon ๐Ÿšซ

@Jedd11

Robert von Rancke-Graves I, Claudius

Replies:   Jim S
Jim S ๐Ÿšซ

@Argon

Also one of the best miniseries (Masterpiece Theatre if I remember correctly) to ever come out of British television. Derek Jacobi was masterful as Claudius. As was Patrick Stewart long before playing Captain Jean-Luc Picard in Star Trek.

Replies:   Argon  Mushroom
Argon ๐Ÿšซ

@Jim S

Agree. I saw the BBC miniseries before I read the book.

Mushroom ๐Ÿšซ

@Jim S

As was Patrick Stewart long before playing Captain Jean-Luc Picard in Star Trek.

He was already well known to us that watched films and TV from Europe. "Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy" (with Sir Alec Guinness), "I, Claudius", Excalibur (King Leodegrance, father of Guinevere), and Dune among his most well known appearances prior to Star Trek.

lnettnay ๐Ÿšซ

@Jedd11

Daniel Boone? Seriously? Never heard anything about him being a bad boy. Unless it had something to do with the bear that he killed. ๐Ÿ˜—

Lonny

Replies:   Jedd11
Jedd11 ๐Ÿšซ

@lnettnay

Not Dan'l himself, but his wife and brother. Daniel was often gone for months or longer. There have been rumors for over 200 years now his brother looked after his wife when he was gone. And by looking after, I mean several of Daniel's kids were actually his brother's. Also it has been mentioned that he may have also plugged Daniel's daughter, Jemima, though that has not been mentioned NEARLY as much as the wife, and is likely untrue. Of course it could all be untrue, but the wife and brother tale has lasted a long time, and probably has some truth to it.

richardshagrin ๐Ÿšซ

@Jedd11

Caligula

Cal is California.
"What does IGU mean?
I Give Up"
LA is Los Angeles.

So the story is about a character in Los Angeles, California who gives up.

Back to Top

 

WARNING! ADULT CONTENT...

Storiesonline is for adult entertainment only. By accessing this site you declare that you are of legal age and that you agree with our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.


Log In