Please read. Significant change on the site that will affect compatibility [ Dismiss ]
Home ยป Forum ยป Bug Report and Feature Requests

Forum: Bug Report and Feature Requests

Possible out of sync or wonky behavior of how treads on forum are marked

LupusDei ๐Ÿšซ

Nothing critical, as it seems to clear over time, but it's possibly got worse recently.

It is possible there's some events out of sync, or some other weirdness. Just now, my thread "Mister do you exist? (Or are a robot?)" by LupusDei [Last: awnlee jawking] is marked as having unread posts, but contain no post by awnlee jawking at all (possibly yet). It remains marked as updated after opening it. That's weird, but fine if it's stuck in that state while waiting for said awnlee jawking post to filter through the cache. It's not the first time I noticed similar behavior, just the most recent and very obvious.

Also, I often, but not always, notice treads marked as having new posts when the new post is my own. That reliably clear when I look at my post the second time.

Keet ๐Ÿšซ

@LupusDei

Also, I often, but not always, notice treads marked as having new posts when the new post is my own. That reliably clear when I look at my post the second time.

That one is logical. It's a new post in the topic. Although there is something to say about automatically marking your own post as read, it's not a bug or out of sync.
The first problem is caused by caching as is mentioned in this forum multiple times over the last few months. I believe someone stated that it only happens in flat view. That's the view I also prefer so I see it happening too.

Replies:   Dominions Son  madnige
Dominions Son ๐Ÿšซ

@Keet

The first problem is caused by caching as is mentioned in this forum multiple times over the last few months. I believe someone stated that it only happens in flat view. That's the view I also prefer so I see it happening too.

Even in flat view it doesn't affect every thread, and the threads that are affected take a lot longer to clear than what has been stated as the refresh cycle on the back end.

Quite frankly the problem seems to follow comments by particular users.

madnige ๐Ÿšซ
Updated:

@Keet

The first problem is caused by caching as is mentioned in this forum multiple times over the last few months. I believe someone stated that it only happens in flat view. That's the view I also prefer so I see it happening too.

I don't believe it's a caching problem since appending ?r=1 to the URL gives exactly the same results; the ?r= is (or at least, was) used elsewhere on the site specifically for the purpose of defeating caching. This shows that if it is caching, it is purely internal to the site and under Lazeez's control (the ?r=1 changes the URL, defeating ISP caching, but unless the page explicitly reads the variable r it has no effect on the page content).

ETA: the adding ?r=1 only applies to the thread URL https://storiesonline.net/d/s6/t9060/possible-out-of-sync ; for particular post URLs (like this one, https://storiesonline.net/d/s6/t9060/possible-out-of-sync?a=a158306#po158306 it becomes &r=1 embedded before the # https://storiesonline.net/d/s6/t9060/possible-out-of-sync?a=a158306&r=1#po158306

I have noticed that when this problem occurs and can be worked round by switching to threaded view and back to flat,

1/ the 'missing' post which was shown in threaded view is still missing on return to flat view (until there is another post to the thread or a lot of time expires, anyway),

2/ the thread is no longer marked as having unread posts in the threads listing (all by date, for me), which with 1/ shows an inconsistency in the site state, and

3/ a new post to the thread (AOT a reply post) appears immediately with no issues, dragging the 'missing' post with it, regardless of how long the 'caching issue' has been apparent.

Also, it may be relevant that the 'missing' post is (as far as I've seen) always a reply to an individual post rather than to the thread (i.e. is indented in thread view), though I've not yet tried to characterise this aspect. That's probably significant because this problem arose when threaded view was added (ETA or at least when posts the thread were assigned as replies to the first post). It also ties in with DS's observation of affecting particular posters, as people will tend to reply to thread or reply to individul posts, but rarely both; it frequently occurs for Vincent Berg's posts since he seems to always reply to particular posts.

Replies:   Dominions Son  Keet
Dominions Son ๐Ÿšซ

@madnige

This shows that if it is caching, it is purely internal to the site and under Lazeez's control

Which is what Lazeez has said. He has it caching the forum posts on the back end server at 5 minute intervals.

Replies:   madnige
madnige ๐Ÿšซ

@Dominions Son

He has it caching the forum posts on the back end server at 5 minute intervals.

... which is inconsistent with LupusDei's and sunseeker's observation of 15 mins, and my own unrecorded observation of a couple of hours (some time ago now, so the site may have changed since). That's not saying Lazeez doesn't have the 5-min cache turnover, but rather that there is some other issue as well - it doesn't matter how frequently the cache is rebuilt, if it's rebuilt with missing posts, then pages will be served with missing posts.

awnlee jawking ๐Ÿšซ

@madnige

The 5 minutes caching was an issue before the introduction of threaded view but, as you've worked out, threaded view has added a whole new dimension.

AJ

Dominions Son ๐Ÿšซ

@madnige

That's not saying Lazeez doesn't have the 5-min cache turnover, but rather that there is some other issue as well -

One possible problem is that the cache is not turning over as often as Lazeez thinks it is.

But I don't think that's the problem.

My observation is that this doesn't happen to every thread and the problem seems to follow comments by specific users.

Replies:   sunseeker
sunseeker ๐Ÿšซ
Updated:

@Dominions Son

My observation is that this doesn't happen to every thread and the problem seems to follow comments by specific users.

It just started happening to me a few days ago so. Every thread. It wasn't happening when I first read about it a while back so I doubt I'm one of your "specific users" it happens to.

And changing from threaded to flat view and vice versa doesn't do anything, though if I make a post I can then see the earlier one.

Replies:   Dominions Son
Dominions Son ๐Ÿšซ

@sunseeker

wasn't happening when I first read about it a while back so I doubt I'm one of your "specific users" it happens to.

I think you misunderstood. I seem to see the delay on a given tread after one of several particular users has posted a comment. I'm not saying those users are seeing the delay.

Replies:   Keet
Keet ๐Ÿšซ

@Dominions Son

I think you misunderstood. I seem to see the delay on a given tread after one of several particular users has posted a comment. I'm not saying those users are seeing the delay.

I doubt Lazeez has black/white lists for posters on the forum ;)
I think it's possible that it has to do with the timing of a reply: whether or not a reply is created while the parent post is still waiting in the cache.

Replies:   Dominions Son
Dominions Son ๐Ÿšซ

@Keet

I doubt Lazeez has black/white lists for posters on the forum ;)

Again, that's not even close to what I was suggesting, but frequently I will see multiple threads with new comments at the same time and only one is having the delay problem.

Replies:   LupusDei
LupusDei ๐Ÿšซ
Updated:

@Dominions Son

And, since I'm still here, I only see above comment in flat view. (I expect the reply to reveal it in threaded too, if not, will edit this).

Edit: And it didn't!

In threaded view, I still don't see Dominions Son 2021.10.2. 23:27:09 post, nor my own (!) reply.

Keet ๐Ÿšซ

@madnige

I have noticed that when this problem occurs and can be worked round by switching to threaded view and back to flat,

This problem was definitely introduced with the threaded view and it does only occur in flat view. That's too bad since the threaded view is awful and not what I would expect from a threaded view. first line post with no new replies should be collapsed because without it you have to scroll the whole page to see the new posts. With flat view they are all nicely at the bottom starting with the first unread post.
Switching to threaded and back to flat is no option because the unread posts will no longer be unread. And you have to repeat it with every section/thread.
As you said the caching is internal to the site. Like others I am completely missing posts for very long times and I suspect some never appear. I created a new topic in bug reports and after I saw that the new topic was created it completely disappeared afterwards. The whole topic gone. Not sure if this is related to same problem but it's clearly an other indication that flat view is not working as it did before the threaded view was introduced.
I wonder how many forum visitors like the current threaded view better than the flat view. I find it looking cluttered and confusing.

Replies:   LupusDei
LupusDei ๐Ÿšซ
Updated:

@Keet

This problem was definitely introduced with the threaded view and it does only occur in flat view.

Not true.

I have only used thread view since it was introduced and that's where I see it happening. (Simply never switched it, and well, have no personal problem with it).

All the talk about caching... caching is fine and necessary, and I wouldn't mind any if certain or any posts appeared to distant viewers within fifteen minutes or even more, the problem here is the state discrepancy. The tread title shouldn't get updated status until the new post is in fact available, even if those appear with significantly old posting times then.

Update: actually, the opposite seems to be true for me. Just right now, on the thread https://storiesonline.net/d/s2/t9069/straight-measurement there was two replies I couldn't see in thread view. Switching to flat view revealed them to me. Switching back hid them again. Now, that's definitely weird behavior.

The posts are (local timestamps):

Keet 2021.10.2. 22:25:30

Switch Blayde 2021.10.2. 22:35:01

Updated: 2021.10.2. 22:35:22

As of 23:08 I still see those only in flat view, and not in threaded view. Both are first level replies to the original post of the tread.

Replies:   LupusDei  Keet
LupusDei ๐Ÿšซ

@LupusDei

Since, I saw several other comments only visible in flat view, until sometime in last few minutes it seems all my threaded views updated, possibly all at one. I also noticed a very fresh comment somewhere, in threaded view.

Keet ๐Ÿšซ

@LupusDei

As of 23:08 I still see those only in flat view, and not in threaded view. Both are first level replies to the original post of the tread.

That's weird because several others posting about this problem have said it's a flat view problem. Apparently it occurs in either view which sounds more logical anyway.

LupusDei ๐Ÿšซ
Updated:

@LupusDei

Interestingly enough, this very tread right now has status as updated and

[Last: Keet]Replies: 1

Last updated: 2021.09.30. 13:59:39

While I don't see any post as of 14:14 by local device clock (with should be network syncing).

Update: the reply by Keet appeared when I refreshed after posting this.

So, it takes approximately fifteen minutes...

Replies:   Dominions Son
Dominions Son ๐Ÿšซ

@LupusDei

enough, this very tread right now has status as updated and

[Last: Keet]Replies: 1

Last updated: 2021.09.30. 13:59:39

While I don't see any post as of 14:14 by local device clock (with should be network syncing).

Update: the reply by Keet appeared when I refreshed after posting this.

Adding your own comment and refreshing seems to give you an uncached view of the thread.

Switch Blayde ๐Ÿšซ

@LupusDei

It's been happening to me more lately than in the past. The green dot is on, but there are no new posts. And the green dot stays on until I manually turn it gray. It's happening so often lately that it is annoying.

As to your own posts turning the dot green, I like that. I hope that doesn't change.

sunseeker ๐Ÿšซ

@LupusDei

Happens to me every single time now. 15 minutes and more after a post is made before I can see it unless I make a post. Refreshing the page don't do a dang thing.

And yes it is very annoying! :(

joyR ๐Ÿšซ

@LupusDei

Possible out of sync or wonky behavior of how treads on forum are marked

I'm confident Lazeez will take steps to fix wonky treads.

:)

Replies:   awnlee jawking
awnlee jawking ๐Ÿšซ

@joyR

I'm confident Lazeez will take steps to fix

That's a relief. It would be unseemly for you to be profident ;-)

AJ

Replies:   joyR
joyR ๐Ÿšซ

@awnlee jawking

One can profit from selling confit...

madnige ๐Ÿšซ

@LupusDei

New supposition:

From the this thread posing, there are problems with the site time server/s; this could conceivably influence post visibility and shading. I think it may also be influencing site access in general, I've had a couple of instances of certificate expiry, e.g.

ERROR: cannot verify storiesonline.net's certificate, issued by 'CN=R3,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US':
Issued certificate has expired.

Certainly the time server problems could cause weird and varied effects including affecting caching, and probably require sorting out to get consistent behaviour for bughunting this problem (if it's not the base cause anyway).

Replies:   Michael Loucks
Michael Loucks ๐Ÿšซ

@madnige

ERROR: cannot verify storiesonline.net's certificate, issued by 'CN=R3,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US':
Issued certificate has expired.

This is likely related to the expiration of the intermediate certificate and has been extensively discussed on the LetsEncrypt forums. It's a client-side problem, but a server can provide the full chain (rather than just the leaf cert) to resolve this.

BlacKnight ๐Ÿšซ

@LupusDei

I'm having this problem with "Straight Measurement Quotes in html?" now. It insisted there was an unread post by Dominions Son in the thread, but, in threaded view, I couldn't see it, even if I force-reloaded the page. I switched to flat view, and the unread post appeared (the one about degree size in Fahrenheit). I switched back to threaded view, and it disappeared again.

Possibly relevant: I had just posted in the thread myself when the problem occurred.

Dominions Son ๐Ÿšซ

@BlacKnight

Possibly relevant: I had just posted in the thread myself when the problem occurred.

It's possible I added then deleted a comment to clear the delay problem on my end.

LupusDei ๐Ÿšซ

@BlacKnight

Interestingly, to see Dominion Son replies I switched to flat view. That worked for each of them. But then I forgot to switch back to threaded view, and now Keet had posted there and I don't see that in either view.

So, as of now:

- if your default is treaded view, some cached replies may not be visible for a long time (up to and possibly over half an hour), but can be reliably viewed by switching to flat view;

- if your default is flat view... you're screwed because the replies don't show up in either view.

BlacKnight ๐Ÿšซ

@BlacKnight

I can now see the post in question in both threaded and flat view.

Replies:   BlacKnight
BlacKnight ๐Ÿšซ

@BlacKnight

I'm having the same problem again with that same thread... forum view insisted there was an unread post, and listed awnlee jawking as the most recent poster, but in threaded view, I could not see any new posts โ€” the most recent one I could see was by Dominions Son โ€” and reading the thread didn't clear the "unread post" indicator.

Force-reloading didn't help. I switched to flat view, and the missing post appeared. Switched back to threaded view, and it disappeared again, and the "unread post" indicator went away. It's almost fifteen minutes now since awnlee jawking posted, and I still can't see it in threaded view, but if I switch to flat view, it pops right up.

I'm not the previous most recent poster in the thread this time; Dominions Son was.

I'm wondering if it might be related to a mismatch in which views the poster and the reader are using, if the cache might be getting updated for the view the poster is using, but not immediately for the other?

Replies:   BlacKnight
BlacKnight ๐Ÿšซ

@BlacKnight

... and now it's claiming that there's a new post by Keet, and I can't see it in either view, and the "unread post" indicator does not clear.

Still can't see the awnlee jawking post in threaded view, either.

Replies:   Dominions Son
Dominions Son ๐Ÿšซ

@BlacKnight

They might be commenting and then deleting their comment just to force a refresh to get around the delay comment on their end.

Switch Blayde ๐Ÿšซ

@Dominions Son

They might be commenting and then deleting their comment

I thought that was the culprit, but it happens too frequently.

Replies:   Dominions Son
Dominions Son ๐Ÿšซ

@Switch Blayde

I thought that was the culprit, but it happens too frequently.

Right now with the huge delays, it's an effective way past the delay, so I would expect it to happen a lot right now.

Replies:   awnlee jawking
awnlee jawking ๐Ÿšซ

@Dominions Son

Right now with the huge delays

And they seem to be getting longer.

Perhaps it's a facility, designed to deter us from the forum and get down to story writing instead ;-)

AJ

BlacKnight ๐Ÿšซ

@Dominions Son

They might be commenting and then deleting their comment just to force a refresh to get around the delay comment on their end.

That's not what was happening. I could flip back and forth between threaded and flat views and the post would appear and disappear repeatedly, and the posting time on it did not change.

Lazeez Jiddan (Webmaster)

@LupusDei

Nothing critical, as it seems to clear over time, but it's possibly got worse recently.

It's a bug in how marking as read is handled. The dots are handled in Javascript on the client side. I don't have the time to really dig into the JS code responsible to figure to why this problem exists.

The code that marks a thread as 'Read' when you access it, is exactly the same code that does the same thing when you click on the green dot turning it grey. So why it doesn't work in one situation and it does in another is baffling.

I hate JS. Some day I'll have enough time to figure it out (or hire somebody who does).

It's similar to the new on-site messaging at Bookapy. On my test machine, coming from the test server, the form is perfectly done full-window. But the exact same code, with the exact same browser, coming from the live server, results in a half the window being used by the form. No idea why. I've even saved the whole page as a self contained web archive and did a diff on it and found no differences in html, css, js, images, or any related file, exact same code, yet when served from my local machine it works as intended, but when served from the live server it doesn't.

Effin magic!

LupusDei ๐Ÿšซ

@LupusDei

Right now there's three threads updated

Unread Ages in stories by Uther Pendragon [Last: Keet]Replies: 125
In: Author HangoutLast updated: 2021.10.5. 00:14:47

Read How large a harem is too large? by Quasirandom [Last: Ferrum1]Replies: 63
In: Story Discussion and FeedbackLast updated: 2021.10.5. 00:14:00

Unread Straight Measurement Quotes in html? by Vincent Berg [Last: Keet]Replies: 30
In: Author HangoutLast updated: 2021.10.5. 00:10:27

I can see Ferrum1 post, but neither of two Keet posts, regardless of switching between view modes.

Lazeez Jiddan (Webmaster)

@LupusDei

I think I fixed the issue with the flat/threaded caching discrepancy.

๐Ÿคž

Replies:   Keet  Dominions Son  LupusDei
Keet ๐Ÿšซ

@Lazeez Jiddan (Webmaster)

I think I fixed the issue with the flat/threaded caching discrepancy.

Hallelujah! Or something like that :)
Was it a posting in flatview, not seeing in threaded view and v.v. problem?

Dominions Son ๐Ÿšซ

@Lazeez Jiddan (Webmaster)

Nope, I'm still seeing the issue on this very thread.

It says the thread is updated, but Lazeez's comment is still the last one I see.

Replies:   Switch Blayde
Switch Blayde ๐Ÿšซ

@Dominions Son

Lazeez's comment is still the last one I see.

You don't see Keet's at 12:46:09?

awnlee jawking ๐Ÿšซ

@Switch Blayde

You don't see Keet's at 12:46:09?

That would still be within the 5 minute caching thingy oojit.

AJ

Dominions Son ๐Ÿšซ

@Switch Blayde

You don't see Keet's at 12:46:09?

I didn't until after I refreshed after posting my comment.

Replies:   Switch Blayde
Switch Blayde ๐Ÿšซ

@Dominions Son

I didn't until after I refreshed after posting my comment.

Yikes. That means all those times I saw the green dot without a new post there probably was a new post that I could have seen if I refreshed it. And the green dot didn't automatically go away because I didn't read the last one posted (the invisible one).

Replies:   Dominions Son
Dominions Son ๐Ÿšซ
Updated:

@Switch Blayde

That means all those times I saw the green dot without a new post there probably was a new post that I could have seen if I refreshed it.

Note: I'm not talking about a browser refresh. That does not work. I'm talking about the refresh button/link that gets put in by the SOL server after you post a comment.

Well, maybe the browser refresh would work after posting a new comment of your own. The main thing for getting around the delayed comments is to post your own comment.

Replies:   LupusDei
LupusDei ๐Ÿšซ

@Dominions Son

The main thing for getting around the delayed comments is to post your own comment.

Nope, even that didn't work for me at same point. At least at the worst of it I didn't see my own reply to a certain post of yours in thread view, as reported above as it happened:

LupusDei 2021.10.2. 23:31:35
Updated: 2021.10.2. 23:34:28

@Dominions Son
And, since I'm still here, I only see above comment in flat view. (I expect the reply to reveal it in threaded too, if not, will edit this).

Edit: And it didn't!

In threaded view, I still don't see Dominions Son 2021.10.2. 23:27:09 post, nor my own (!) reply.

LupusDei ๐Ÿšซ

@Lazeez Jiddan (Webmaster)

Lazeez Jiddan (Webmaster)2021.10.5. 20:40:22

@LupusDei
I think I fixed the issue with the flat/threaded caching discrepancy.

Unfortunately I'm not so sure. Just now I did see

Keet 2021.10.7. 17:18:42

exclusively in flat view again, until about 17:50 it was on very big thread so double checking took a quite a bit, and eventually I found it, after second back and forth switching, but it wasn't there the first time I opened the tread in threaded view.

Then, I don't seem to see the yellow dates discussed here today, so perhaps I'm still on old code on my phone

Quasirandom ๐Ÿšซ

@LupusDei

I don't see the yellow dates either, also on phone.

Lazeez Jiddan (Webmaster)

@Quasirandom

I don't see the yellow dates either, also on phone.

fixed.

Lazeez Jiddan (Webmaster)

@LupusDei

Unfortunately I'm not so sure. Just now I did see

Keet 2021.10.7. 17:18:42

I've redone the caching code. I've tested and tested in every possible configuration. Any changes to a thread clears the cache.

Let me know if the fixes failed.

Replies:   Quasirandom
Quasirandom ๐Ÿšซ

@Lazeez Jiddan (Webmaster)

What's the condition for yellow datestamps? I'm seeing some messages previously read (as indicated by grey background) with yellow, and some unread messages without it.

Lazeez Jiddan (Webmaster)

@Quasirandom

What's the condition for yellow datestamps?

See here

Grant ๐Ÿšซ
Updated:

@LupusDei

OK, the two posts before mine have the date & time stamp highlighted in yellow.

Edit- as does mine.

awnlee jawking ๐Ÿšซ

@Grant

date & time stamp highlighted in yellow

Does anyone know what that's supposed to mean? I can't discern the rationale.

AJ

Replies:   madnige
madnige ๐Ÿšซ

@awnlee jawking

Does anyone know what that's supposed to mean?

I can't give a definitive answer, only Lazeez can do that, but my observation is that the yellow highlight on some timestamps is applied to those posts made within the prior 24hr, regardless of the read/unread status of the post (grey background shading). My supposition is that this is intended to make it easier to find unread posts in threaded view, I can't work out any other rationale.

Replies:   awnlee jawking
awnlee jawking ๐Ÿšซ

@madnige

my observation is that the yellow highlight on some timestamps is applied to those posts made within the prior 24hr, regardless of the read/unread status of the post (grey background shading)

Perhaps my persistence with 32-bit browsers is causing erratic behaviour. Now you've mentioned it, I can see it's doing that with some topics but not others.

AJ

Replies:   madnige
madnige ๐Ÿšซ

@awnlee jawking

some topics but not others

I've not yet worked out why some threads remain unhighlighted; I had suspected that the highlighting was applied only on threads I had posted to, but I was able to discount that.

persistence with 32-bit browsers

Me too

Lazeez Jiddan (Webmaster)

@Grant

OK, the two posts before mine have the date & time stamp highlighted in yellow.

This is for threads older than 7 days, it highlights posts from the last 24 hours. It helps particularly in threaded view when somebody revives a big thread where recent replies may be hard to spot, so they get the yellow highlight making them easier to notice quickly while scrolling.

Replies:   Keet  Quasirandom
Keet ๐Ÿšซ
Updated:

@Lazeez Jiddan (Webmaster)

It helps particularly in threaded view when somebody revives a big thread where recent replies may be hard to spot, so they get the yellow highlight making them easier to notice quickly while scrolling.

That is why I don't use the threaded view. You have to scroll from the first unread post to the bottom to see all new posts. Sometimes there is a huge amount of posts between unread posts so thats a lot of scrolling. The yellow helps but what actually would be better is if posts without unread replies are collapsed. I understand that that is a difficult thing to implement without a complete rebuild. With the flatview I have all unread posts at the bottom starting with the first unread post. A good addition for the current threaded view would be that you have a jump link to the next unread post so you don't have to scroll.

Replies:   Dominions Son
Dominions Son ๐Ÿšซ

@Keet

The yellow helps but what actually would be better is if posts without unread replies are collapsed.

Even better would be a button to jump to the next unread post.

Replies:   Keet
Keet ๐Ÿšซ
Updated:

@Dominions Son

Even better would be a button to jump to the next unread post.

I did say that in the same post:

A good addition for the current threaded view would be that you have a jump link to the next unread post so you don't have to scroll.

Quasirandom ๐Ÿšซ

@Lazeez Jiddan (Webmaster)

For clarification: by "threads older than 7 days" you mean started more than 7 days ago, or last posted in more than 7 days ago?

Lazeez Jiddan (Webmaster)

@Quasirandom

For clarification: by "threads older than 7 days" you mean started more than 7 days ago, or last posted in more than 7 days ago?

Thread started more than 7 days ago.

Keet ๐Ÿšซ

@LupusDei

I now have 6 threads at the top of the "all threads" list that apparently have new posts which I don't see when I open the thread. It's seems to me like the problem is getting worse.

Dominions Son ๐Ÿšซ

@Keet

Interesting I haven't seen it getting worse, but all of the last 4 or 5 occurrences were after you were the last commenter on a thread.

LupusDei ๐Ÿšซ

@Keet

Since

Lazeez Jiddan (Webmaster) 2021.10.7. 22:25:54

I've redone the caching code.

I haven't noticed this again even once.

Quasirandom ๐Ÿšซ

@Keet

I've seen it twice in the last day, after it cleared up following the caching fix

Lazeez Jiddan (Webmaster)

@Keet

I now have 6 threads at the top of the "all threads" list that apparently have new posts which I don't see when I open the thread. It's seems to me like the problem is getting worse.

I think I finally got it fixed. (yes, I did say that before)

You, (Keet) use the anonymous site. SOL and the anonymous site use separate cache repositories (each domain uses its own repository to avoid cross site cache collision). So when you post using the anonymous site, the thread's cache files were getting cleared from the anonymous site's cache only, but have to expire on SOL before they're refreshed (TTL is 2 hours for the forum threads). And when a thread gets a post on SOL, the anonymous site's cache files don't get cleared and you don't see the update until the cache files expire in the anonymous site's repository.

I had to redesign the caching bits to be able to clear a file's cache across sites on post/edit.

It was an interesting problem to solve for code used across multiple sites and embedded into multiple CMSs. (SOL/Bookapy/Subspot/Clitawards engines)

Let's see if I actually solved the issue or yet again failed like before.

Replies:   Quasirandom  Keet
Quasirandom ๐Ÿšซ

@Lazeez Jiddan (Webmaster)

the anonymous site

??

Replies:   Keet
Keet ๐Ÿšซ

@Quasirandom

the anonymous site

??

It's an extra SOL subscription feature which allows you to use a different URL than storiesonline,net. It allows SOL access for those on a network where the URL storiesonline.net is blocked. I just buy the full package to support SOL. I'm on my own network so I can use either.

Replies:   Quasirandom
Quasirandom ๐Ÿšซ

@Keet

Thanks. Somehow I missed that.

Keet ๐Ÿšซ

@Lazeez Jiddan (Webmaster)

I think I finally got it fixed. (yes, I did say that before)

Thank you! It was getting really bothersome. Dominions Son did have a point when he said it was particular to my posts :)

Back to Top

Close
 

WARNING! ADULT CONTENT...

Storiesonline is for adult entertainment only. By accessing this site you declare that you are of legal age and that you agree with our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.


Log In