Dogs chase cats; it's just in their nature. No one blames them or looks down on them. It's just Mother Nature doing her thing. Likewise, hounds of the horny male humanoid variety love to chase pussy. But for that these days, they get a bad rep and are called pigs ( Porcus Chauvanisticus Masculanus, to use the proper scientific term ) It's just not 'PC" to be a P.C. Porcus Chauvanisticus these days.

For many years the radical feminist girl-ella movement had cowed government and private institutions into a corner of guilt and put pathetically pandering politicians on the defensive. So defensive were they, that merely being a man's man was an offence in some circles. Not illegal, but politically incorrect and decidedly immoral.

Women's Liberation Groups were known to blackball colleagues and associates who were married ... to a man, that is. They were accused of 'sleeping with the enemy.' Fem-terrorist conferences went so far as to expel their own lib-sisters if it was discovered they were dating guys. That was called 'fraternizing with the foe.'

What this radical, exclusive and judgmental approach did to some vulnerable and impressionable women was sad indeed. But that was nothing compared to what it did to men. The cultural changes in North America and Europe saw the male model of manliness eviscerated and emasculated. Traditional roles do shift and flux with the times as well as through technological and economic necessity. No one was denying that. But this latest impact on the male psyche shattered men's will to an imposed and unnatural degree: by fiat, men were symbolically neutered. They became neither female ( nurturing givers of life ) nor male ( protective and overseeing fortresses of strength. ) Ironically, given the rhetoric and ideology of the era, men were objectified.

Male and female as sex objects was nothing new, of course. In the Victorian Era fig leaves were placed on statues and even paintings to cover up the male genitals. The nude female figure, on the other hand, was considered the essence of human pulchritude and smooth shaven yoni were on display in public galleries with nary a sniff of prudishness from the Christian Ladies Guild or Church of England elders. Woman equaled beauty, man equaled shame. Freudians, for instance, thought the male phallus was just too powerful a figure for the weak willed women of the day.

But the modern reality was far different, indeed its polar opposite. While the smooth shaven Venus Mount was still considered by all the height of beauty, the male phallus lost its inherent power and morphed into its opposite quality; cocks became shameful not as too powerful an image, but because they symbolized utter impotence. As men's position and esteem in society lowered, so men themselves, and especially their cocks, became sorry versions of virility, pathetic fallacies. Cock of the Walk became Mock of the Jock.

That's how it was 100 years into the decline and fall of masculinity. The feminization of men had one purpose only, their humiliation and emasculation. Men became pussies and the more they accepted this role, the less they were regarded by women. And not just by staunch feminists. Woman of all walks of life and persuasion laughed at these male-pussies, these boys-without-balls, these droopy-dicks. The most popular expression among young, giggling girls to describe such men, these pathetic pussies, was 'Tiny Toms'.

So Tiny Tom pussies became the male norm and women boasted and bragged, kept the men in their place and thought they had won at last. But life is not that simple. While Tiny Toms had lost any semblance of masculine power, control and virility, they had attained little more than the mere trappings of femininity.

The new culture provided feminized fashion for men, such as bikini style men's underpants which were redesigned women's underwear adapted to fit the male physique.

The new culture provided multi-level advertising and subliminal propaganda to reinforce its message, ' One cunt good, two balls bad. ' The new culture did get them to use male make-up. The new culture did teach them to do domestic chores. The new culture did put them into low-paying and meaningless, boring jobs. The new culture did subject them to humiliating advertising that mocked their nakedness. Ads showed men blushing with shame as clothed women snickered at the guys' nude and semi-nude state.

But what the new culture did not do is off-set their loss of masculinity. Men did not, could not, become women, just lesser men. And a woman is not a lesser man. She is a creature unto herself. And that is non-transferable. Tiny Toms did not become Mighty Moms. And despite hormonal injections and increased testosterone dosages, women could not acquire the essence of manhood, just its awkward misplacement in a feminine psyche ( plus coarser body hair. )