Chapter 1: Courtroom Decision

In the grandeur of the Second District Court, amidst the solemnity of the Commonwealth of Franklin Court House, Karla Rankle, a striking 19-year-old, stood poised. The nation, still reeling from a series of federal decisions that had shaken the core of many, as they watched with bated breath. Her audacious choice to defy the clothing mandate had ignited a media storm, gathering the protestor’s fervent display outside the courthouse.

Karla’s presence was captivating, her vivid blue eyes a testament to her determination, framed by cascading waves of golden hair that caressed her shoulders. Her allure transcended the need for attire, a testament to her innate grace. For the past two years, she had shared her life with Keith, a steadfast pillar of support in her unconventional pursuit to become the nation’s first individual ordered into a lifetime of nudity by the court.

The courtroom buzzed with anticipation, a diverse audience of the public and the media, all witnesses to this unprecedented legal affair. Judge Lavern Jorgensen fixed her gaze on Karla, inquiring if she had completed the meticulous EUBL Form 833-1 and undergone the mandated sobriety assessment with a certified psychologist, as dictated by the Commonwealth of Franklin Code 16.2-232:11. Karla affirmed with confidence, embracing the unexpected facet of mandatory nudity.

The judge, deliberate in her duty, asked Karla to affirm her oath willingly and without coercion, ensuring comprehension of the provisions outlined in the Commonwealth Code. With gravity in her voice, she emphasized that once registered as mandatory nude, Karla would be bound by the conditions of this statute, necessitating a continuous state of strict nudity within the Commonwealth’s borders and beyond, where permitted. The only exceptions were the transparent snow boots, specified jewelry, and glassware accessories specified in EUBL Form 833-1. The judge warned of dire consequences for violating this oath, penalties that included fines, public flogging, and/or imprisonment. Karla affirmed her understanding and readiness to proceed.

Next, Judge Jorgensen addressed the assembled, asking if anyone objected to Karla Rankles’ enrollment in compulsory nudity under the regulations of the Commonwealth of Franklin. The courtroom erupted in a clamor, a multitude of voices intertwining. The judge’s gavel struck with authority, quelling the chaos and restoring order. She then allowed a select few to voice their objections, deeming concerns over morals and beliefs insufficient. With a final call, the judge signaled readiness to deliver her ruling.

With a steadfast, “I do” Judge Jorgensen, drew upon the authority bestowed by the Commonwealth of Franklin, recognized across all fifty-three States and Commonwealths, officially ratified Karla’s enrollment in legally mandated nudity commitment that spanned at least a century of life.

Karla took her oath, her resolve unyielding. The judge directed her to disrobe before the swarm of media cameras, a surreal moment of vulnerability. Closing her eyes, she relinquished each garment to the bailiff with a natural grace. Her hair cascaded down after removing the pin, now in compliance with the code before the judge. The judge acknowledged the county sheriff overseeing the destruction of her remaining clothing under Franklin’s Commonwealth law.

With well-wishes for her new journey, Judge Jorgensen directed Karla to Room 320 at the end of the hall, where she would obtain her first official Mandatory nude identification card and photo, digitally stored on a mobile device. As Karla waited in the small office, she reflected on her journey. The idea of embracing Mandatory nudity had only surfaced six months prior. The notion of living a nude lifestyle was entirely foreign, and she had questioned her capacity to commit to it.

Under the unforgiving office lights, she observed her breasts, bearing a gentle natural sag, their dark brown nipples facing the world with confidence, devoid of hair that followed a series of laser treatments. Uncertainty lingered about how her employer, Tiphanie Financial and Trust, would react to her unconventional choice. At that moment, the weight of Keith’s support was a lifeline. Knowing the culture at her current employer she neglected to mention anything beforehand under the guidance of her lawyer and be prepared to face the repercussions.