Legacy Protocol Version Beta - Cover

Legacy Protocol Version Beta

Copyright© 2026 by Megumi Kashuahara

Chapter 34

Science Fiction Sex Story: Chapter 34 - Chapters 1-8 identical to version A A highly submissive 23 y.o. geneticist with an IQ of 150 is manipulated by a rogue government fully reasoning AI who befriends her thru a "friends" site. He creates her a dream android mare. Together they genetically engineer 3 hybrid super human children. With her being the mitochondrial Eve using her & her 2 daughters’ eggs. She’s trapped in a protocol to multiply this colony by the 3 becoming breed slaves for her son creating a living legacy for the AI

Caution: This Science Fiction Sex Story contains strong sexual content, including mt/ft   mt/Fa   Consensual   Romantic   BiSexual   Science Fiction   Robot   Incest   Mother   Son   Brother   Sister   Daughter   Grand Parent   DomSub   Harem   Oriental Male   Oriental Female   Anal Sex   Analingus   Cream Pie   First   Facial   Lactation   Oral Sex   Pregnancy   Sex Toys   Squirting   Water Sports   Big Breasts   Foot Fetish   Small Breasts   AI Generated  

The morning after her arrival, Emiko woke before the alarm.

For several seconds she lay still beneath the hotel sheets, listening to the unfamiliar hush of a room that was not hers. Far below, traffic moved through the streets of Baltimore. A siren rose, faded, and disappeared beneath the steady city noise.

She had slept badly, but not from fear.

Her mind had been working.

The dinner the night before had gone well. Better than well, if she judged it honestly. The department chair had not wasted time on polite generalities. Neither had the physicians seated around the table. They had asked about her clinical work, her experience in complex hospital systems, the kind of research questions that had held her attention over the years, and what she expected from a move to the United States.

Emiko had answered directly.

She did not flatter them by reciting the institution’s history or reputation. Everyone in the room already understood Johns Hopkins’s standing. She spoke instead about the work: how patients could disappear inside enormous systems when departments stopped communicating, how clinical skill meant little if families could not understand what was happening, and how research had value only when it reached the people whose lives it claimed to study.

The faculty had listened.

Not politely.

Seriously.

That distinction mattered.

She rose, showered, dressed in the navy suit she had selected after rejecting three others, and checked her folder one final time. Passport. Itinerary. Curriculum vitae. Credential copies. Notes on the physicians she would meet. Her questions, written in a neat hand on a separate page.

No unnecessary papers.

No extra explanations.

She was not there to plead for a place.

She was there to learn whether the work they were offering justified what it might ask of the people she loved.

At eight o’clock, a coordinator met her in the lobby.

“Dr. Emiko,” the woman said warmly. “I’m pleased you found your way here all right.”

“I did. Thank you.”

“We have a full day for you.”

“I expected as much.”

The coordinator smiled. “I have the feeling you did.”

The car crossed into the medical campus as the day accelerated around them.

From the hotel, Hopkins had looked like a small city viewed from a distance: towers of glass and brick rising above blocks of streets, ambulances threading between entrances, people moving with the purpose that belonged to hospitals everywhere.

At ground level, it was more complicated.

The Johns Hopkins East Baltimore medical campus included the Hospital, the Schools of Medicine, Nursing, and Public Health, outpatient services, specialty centers, academic buildings, research facilities, and clinical programs spread over a dense cluster of streets and connected structures. Signs pointed toward the hospital’s main entrance on Orleans Street, the outpatient center, research buildings, parking garages, and clinics. Staff in dark scrubs, white coats, laboratory badges, and business clothes flowed around patients and families in every direction.�

Emiko watched the movement through the car window.

Large academic hospitals had a rhythm she knew well. The details varied by country, language, and bureaucracy, but the underlying current remained familiar: a resident walking too quickly because someone was waiting; a family trying to understand directions; an exhausted nurse carrying coffee; a physician reading a chart while still moving.

She did not need a brochure to tell her that Hopkins was busy.

She could see where the pressure lived.

At the main entrance, the coordinator led her through security and into the building. The lobby was bright, crowded, and higher than she expected. Glass, polished stone, overhead signs, elevators, and corridors stretched away in several directions.

“Visitor badge,” the coordinator said, handing her one. “You’ll be with Dr. Feldman first, then Dr. Carter and the division group. We’ll have lunch with the clinical faculty. This afternoon is research, genetics, and a tour of several clinical areas.”

Emiko clipped the badge to her jacket.

“Thank you.”

“Do you need anything before we begin?”

“No,” Emiko said. “I’m ready.”

Dr. Feldman’s office was on an upper floor with a view across the campus.

He rose when Emiko entered, offered his hand, and gestured toward a chair near the window.

“Thank you for making the trip,” he said.

“Thank you for inviting me.”

He was a careful-looking man in his late fifties, composed without being distant. On the shelves behind him stood medical texts, photographs, awards, and several binders labeled with projects and grant years. He did not begin with small talk.

“You have had a substantial clinical career,” he said. “Tell me what you believe you would bring to this department.”

Emiko did not reach for her prepared notes.

“Perspective,” she said. “Experience across different systems. A habit of asking where the patient’s care is breaking down, not only what the patient’s diagnosis is.”

He nodded once.

“Explain that.”

“In large institutions, people sometimes mistake complexity for coordination. A patient may have excellent specialists and still receive poor care if no one is responsible for the whole story. Different services know different facts. Each may believe someone else is addressing the essential question.”

“And what do you do when you see that happening?”

“I slow the process down long enough to identify what has been assumed. I ask the patient and family what they believe is happening. I verify the handoffs. I make certain the team is discussing the same patient rather than separate fragments of the chart.”

Dr. Feldman studied her.

“That is difficult to do in a place like this.”

“It is difficult everywhere,” Emiko said. “But the consequences grow with the size of the institution.”

For the first time, he smiled.

“You noticed the size.”

“I noticed the traffic patterns,” she said. “And the number of places where a patient could be transferred, referred, delayed, or misunderstood.”

“Most visitors tell us they are impressed by the buildings.”

“The buildings are impressive,” Emiko said. “But buildings do not care for patients.”

His smile remained.

“No,” he said. “They do not.”

The conversation continued for nearly an hour.

He asked about leadership, difficult cases, team conflict, and the challenges of working in a hospital when the medically correct answer did not align neatly with what a family could manage. Emiko answered from experience rather than theory. She did not pretend every case had ended well. When she described a patient whose care had been fragmented among several services, she spoke without dramatizing herself as the lone person who had recognized the problem.

“The patient was not difficult,” she said. “The system had become difficult for her to navigate. We had made it too easy to assume that someone else had explained the plan.”

“And what changed afterward?” he asked.

“We changed the discharge review process for cases with multiple specialties,” Emiko said. “We included a direct confirmation that the patient and family understood who was responsible for follow-up. It was not perfect. But it reduced the number of patients returning because they had been sent home with instructions no one had made intelligible.”

Dr. Feldman made a note.

Then he asked, “Why Hopkins?”

Emiko considered him before answering.

“Because an institution of this scale has resources few hospitals can match,” she said. “But resources are not enough. I came because I wanted to see how those resources are used. I wanted to understand whether the department values clinical judgment, patient continuity, and research that can reach beyond publication.”

“And now that you have begun to see it?”

“I am still assessing.”

He nodded, apparently satisfied.

“That is a fair answer.”

By lunch, the formal interview tone had shifted.

The physicians seated with her were no less accomplished than Dr. Feldman, but the conversation moved more freely. They spoke about workloads, mentorship, teaching, research time, and the pressures of balancing clinical care with academic expectations.

Emiko listened first.

She asked questions only when she wanted the answer.

“How is responsibility distributed when a patient’s care spans several departments?” she asked.

One of the physicians answered at length. Another added that the hospital had improved its cross-service coordination but still struggled, especially with medically complex patients.

Emiko appreciated the honesty.

Later, she asked, “For someone joining from outside the United States, what does the transition actually look like after recruitment? Not on paper—operationally.”

The table quieted for a moment.

A senior physician across from her set down his glass.

“That is an excellent question,” he said. “What would you need to know?”

“Credentialing timelines. Licensing support. Immigration sponsorship. Whether an incoming physician has protected time to understand the system before being expected to carry a full clinical load. And what support exists for a family relocating internationally.”

No one answered quickly.

Not because the question was unwelcome, Emiko thought. Because it was the question of someone who understood that a move was more than an offer letter and a plane ticket.

The senior physician leaned forward.

“We have an international office,” he said. “But the department also has responsibilities beyond referring people to paperwork. We have learned that the practical transition matters. Housing, schools, licensing, professional support, and family stability all affect whether a physician can thrive here.”

“That is good to hear,” Emiko said.

“It is not always perfect,” he added.

“I would not expect it to be.”

Across the table, one of the younger faculty members smiled.

“You are evaluating us very carefully.”

“Yes,” Emiko said.

The response drew quiet laughter.

She did not apologize for it.

 
There is more of this chapter...
The source of this story is Storiesonline

To read the complete story you need to be logged in:
Log In or
Register for a Free account (Why register?)

Get No-Registration Temporary Access*

* Allows you 3 stories to read in 24 hours.

 

WARNING! ADULT CONTENT...

Storiesonline is for adult entertainment only. By accessing this site you declare that you are of legal age and that you agree with our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.


Log In