The View From the Cello Section - Cover

The View From the Cello Section

Copyright© 2026 by Marc Nobbs

Chapter 10: Keeping The Streak Alive

Keeping The Streak Alive

Sunday 24th November 2013

This is going to be quite short by my standards. I am writing primarily because I have posted something every Sunday since term began, and I refuse to let this week break the streak. Also, I have an assignment that is currently taking up most of my desk and an unreasonable proportion of my thoughts.

So ... Hello. A week happened. Here is the evidence.

Orchestra

Rehearsal went well. The Christmas concert is now close enough that small mistakes that nobody worried about six weeks ago are beginning to be treated as personal betrayals.

The conductor has mostly stopped correcting major structural problems and has begun focusing on smaller details. This presumably means we are improving. It also means we can spend ten minutes repeating four bars because the second violins are slightly too loud or the cellos are not placing a particular note precisely on the beat.

The Dvořák sounds rather wonderful. There are moments now when the cello section begins to breathe through a phrase together, and you stop hearing separate instruments and start hearing the section.

I continue to enjoy Fourth Desk more than I expected.

The Celestial Quartet

We have news. Actual news.

Someone from the Arts Centre heard us rehearsing. This initially caused some alarm because we had not realised we had an audience. Apparently, we were not dreadful, because we have been offered a slot in the foyer performance area early in the New Year.

It will be a short, informal performance rather than a full concert. Probably thirty or forty minutes. There is no date yet, but we said yes immediately, which means we now have to decide what we are actually going to perform rather than repeatedly saying how nice it would be to perform something one day. Beethoven, almost certainly. Por una cabeza, because apparently I have lost control of my life. Shostakovich, if we become brave enough. We’ve been working on Andante Cantabile, the second movement from Tchaikovsky’s String Quartet number one, as well.

Finn has suggested adding something new. We have told Finn no.

This will be our first public appearance as the Celestial Quartet. People may deliberately stop and listen to us. Exciting. Terrifying. Mostly exciting.

Badminton

We practised on Wednesday, and it went well. My knee behaved, Paul behaved, and I behaved. Mostly.

Our semi-final against Ross and Gemma is this coming Wednesday. We know what we need to do, and we have trained as well as we can, but I am not making any predictions.

Ask me again on Thursday.

Moving on.

Law

I had one of those seminars this week. Legal Foundations, which remains my least favourite module despite its continued insistence on being compulsory. I’d done the reading. The tutor was good. It was simply difficult. It was the kind of seminar you enter reasonably confident you understand the subject and leave an hour later wondering whether words have fixed meanings after all.

We spent most of it applying different approaches to statutory interpretation to legislation that appeared to have been drafted specifically to ensure that no sensible interpretation was possible. Then, just as we were packing up, we were given an assignment. Due at the end of next week.

It is horrific.

That is my considered legal analysis. It also counts towards the final grade on this module. Horrific and unavoidable.

It’s a statutory-interpretation problem followed by a case analysis, all within a word limit that somehow seems both impossibly large and completely inadequate. I have made a plan. The plan is already four pages long.

This may indicate a problem with the plan.

Broadly, it involves reading everything again, working out what the question is actually asking, researching, writing, discovering halfway through that my original interpretation was wrong, rewriting, submitting, and pretending this was the plan all along.

There is also provision for a brief period of panic.

Or maybe not so brief.

Lily’s plan for the same assignment appears to be to ask Paul to see the one he did last year. There are two things wrong with that plan. 1) We’re looking at different legislation and a different case, and 2) Paul has repeatedly said, “no”, every time Lily has asked him the same thing since the start of term.

Law. Wonderful.

One Other Thing

I have been given an advance copy of a book that will not be published until the New Year. It is an economics book. I cannot give you the title, identify the author, or quote from it, so please do not ask.

Yes, I realise several of you have just become extremely interested. Behave.

I intended to read the introduction and perhaps the first chapter on Friday evening. It was a good plan.

I finished the entire book.

That was not the plan.

The problem is that the book is unbelievably good. That is not qualified praise. Economics books are usually written as though anyone attempting to understand economics ought to be punished for their curiosity. This one is clear without being simplistic, ambitious without pretending to solve everything, and willing to confront the strongest objections to its central argument. It explains the theory, then asks what would have to be true for the theory to fail. Which I obviously enjoyed.

There are things I disagree with, things I am still thinking about, and several pages now covered in pencil notes. One chapter addressed precisely the problem I had been worried might undermine the entire theory. I put the book down, stared at the wall for approximately five days, then read the explanation again.

The answer seemed obvious once it had been explained. I was annoyed with myself for not seeing it.

I am very much looking forward to discussing it properly after publication. But, for now, it’s very good. Annoyingly good.

That is all for this week. Orchestra. Quartet. Badminton. Law attempting murder. A book I accidentally read in one sitting.

A perfectly normal week. I’d forgotten they existed.

Now I must return to my horrific assignment.

See you next Sunday.

TAGS: #university #law student #legal foundations #statutory interpretation #orchestra #cello #celestial quartet #WE HAVE A PERFORMANCE #sort of #Arts Centre #badminton #semi-final Wednesday #not making predictions #law assignments are violence #economics #advance copy #no I cannot tell you what it is #please behave #keeping the streak alive #this actually was a short post

Selected Notes on “Keeping the Streak Alive”

cellosandcoffee reblogged cellolana:

Streak intact. That is all that matters.

TAGS #glad you posted #no questions #good luck with the assignment

cellosbeforefellows replied: THIS IS WHAT SHE CALLS SHORT????

pizzicato-panic replied: There are HEADINGS!!!

cellolana replied: There are fewer headings than usual

ordinarygirl1989 replied: This is not how normal people measure brevity

cellolana replied: I have never claimed to be normal

workingclassandwired replied: Refusing to break the Sunday streak while your assignment consumes your desk is violently student behaviour

cellolana replied: The streak matters now I don’t make the rules


fourstringsattached reblogged cellolana:

THE CELESTIAL QUARTET HAS ITS FIRST PERFORMANCE!

Informal foyer performance or not, this counts. We expect photographs, a programme, a review of the acoustics, a detailed account of the inevitable repertoire argument, and confirmation that all four members survive Shostakovich.

cellolana replied: We have not received a date yet. Please postpone the publicity campaign.

quartetproblems replied: YOU HAVE A GIG!

cellolana replied: A foyer slot.

quartetproblems replied: THAT IS A GIG!

pizzicato-panic replied: “People may deliberately stop and listen to us.” This is so cute.

cellolana replied: Terrifying. Not cute.

pizzicato-panic replied: Both.


alto-clef-is-violence reblogged fourstringsattached:

A FOYER. PLAY THE SHOSTAKOVICH AND MAKE EVERYBODY BUYING COFFEE CONFRONT THE ABYSS.

cellolana replied: The foyer contains several hard reflective surfaces and opens onto two corridors and a café. My preliminary acoustic review is “potentially hazardous”. Your proposal does not improve matters.

shostakovichsghost replied: THE PUBLIC DOES NOT DESERVE COMFORT.

cellolana replied: This is why you are not programming our set.

violinsareaviolation replied: WHAT DID FINN SUGGEST?

cellolana replied: No.

violinsareaviolation replied: THAT WASN’T THE QUESTION.

cellolana replied: It was the answer.

quartetproblems replied: Something ridiculous, then.

cellolana replied: Correct.


BadmintonDan reblogged cellolana:

“My knee behaved, Paul behaved, and I behaved. Mostly.”

THAT’S ALL WE GET???

cellolana replied: Yes.

RacketGirl91 replied: ROSS AND GEMMA ARE IN THREE DAYS.

cellolana replied: I know.

BadmintonDan replied: HOW ARE YOU FEELING?

cellolana replied: Good.

BadmintonDan replied: THIS IS A HOSTILE INTERVIEW.

cellolana replied: Then stop conducting it.

smashandclear replied: She’s gone into pre-match lockdown.

cellolana replied: I have not.

BadmintonDan replied: “Moving on.” PRE-MATCH LOCKDOWN.

cellolana replied: Moving on.

drop-shot-darling replied: No predictions requested. Just wishing you both luck, sensible communication and cooperative knees.

cellolana replied: All three would be appreciated. Thank you.


objection-your-honour reblogged cellolana:

“A statutory-interpretation problem followed by a case analysis, all within a word limit that somehow seems both impossibly large and completely inadequate.”

The authentic undergraduate-law experience.

One obviously relevant provision. Three provisions which contradict it. A definition creating more ambiguity than it resolves. An explanatory note explaining nothing. One fictional defendant who has made every possible bad decision.

firstyearfury replied: Then “Advise Brian,” as if there is any advice left beyond fleeing the jurisdiction.

cellolana replied: His name is Martin. He is an idiot. Fleeing the jurisdiction may be his strongest remaining option.

briefcasebabe replied: How horrific is the actual question?

cellolana replied: I am not reproducing it because I don’t want people accidentally doing my thinking for me. I have used three separate highlighters, and none have improved it.

lawstudentinhell replied: Terminal.

cellolana replied: Potentially.


briefs-and-baroque reblogged cellolana:

“The plan is already four pages long.”

LANA, THAT IS NOT A PLAN. THAT IS THE FIRST DRAFT IN DENIAL.

cellolana replied: I have reduced it to three and a half pages. The situation is therefore under control.

ordinarygirl1989 replied: “There is also provision for a brief period of panic.” She has scheduled the crisis.

cellolana replied: Experience is useful.


economics-and-eyeliner reblogged cellolana:

“I have been given an advance copy of a book that will not be published until the New Year.”

“One chapter addressed precisely the problem I had been worried might undermine the entire theory.”

Oh.

Oh!

TAGS #economics #advance copy #I am thinking thoughts

keynes-is-my-copilot replied: AN UNPUBLISHED ECONOMICS BOOK. OUT IN THE NEW YEAR. LANA!

cellolana replied: I anticipated this reaction.

 
There is more of this chapter...
The source of this story is Storiesonline

To read the complete story you need to be logged in:
Log In or
Register for a Free account (Why register?)

Get No-Registration Temporary Access*

* Allows you 3 stories to read in 24 hours.

 

WARNING! ADULT CONTENT...

Storiesonline is for adult entertainment only. By accessing this site you declare that you are of legal age and that you agree with our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.


Log In