The Long Way Back - Cover

The Long Way Back

Copyright© 2026 by Star Again

Chapter 17: Where You Stand

By February, the building was in my bag every morning.

Peeters’ summary had been folded into the folder behind the bank papers, Van Acker’s counter-scribbles, two notary questions I had copied in red ink, and Mrs. Claes’ list of documents she expected before she would allow anyone to mistake money for stability.

The ninth had passed without ceremony. Nothing had been signed in the final sense, which meant everyone could still ruin the deal while pretending to protect it. Van Acker’s wife had stopped saying no in ways that mattered. The notary had asked for contract copies. Mrs. Claes had asked for cleaner proof, more reserve, fewer surprises. Peeters had found enough wrong to keep the price honest and not enough wrong to kill the purchase.

It came to lectures in the weight of the folder against my ribs. It came to the library when I opened anatomy and found myself calculating roof work in the margin before I noticed. It came to tutoring when Mathis asked a question about cardiac preload and I heard Koen asking whether he would have to leave before exams. It came to sleep late and left before dawn.

The January results arrived in pieces. No one announced them with trumpets. Scores appeared on boards, in office windows, on paper lists pinned with drawing pins that had already given up twice and been replaced. Students stood shoulder to shoulder in cold corridors pretending not to care who was watching their faces. Some laughed too loudly. Some became quiet. Some walked away and came back because believing paper often requires a second attempt.

I passed.

Well enough.

The old part of me wanted to turn the result into fuel, another proof, another column that could be made to hold. The younger body wanted to sleep for a day and eat fried potatoes until the world softened. I did neither properly. I wrote the numbers down, sent my mother a short message, answered Mathis when he asked, and went to training because Hugo disliked students who treated exams as injuries.

My mother replied after lunch.

Good.

Then, two minutes later:

I am proud of you.

I read the second message twice in the hallway outside physiology and then pocketed the phone before it could reach my face.


Hugo had a new boy on the mat.

He was not actually a boy. He was probably twenty-two, broad in the shoulders, with hair cut short at home and the careful politeness of someone who had come to training because fear had begun showing in places he did not like. He wore borrowed trousers that were too long and a white T-shirt already dark under the arms. His name was Marc. He listened hard to every instruction and then forgot half of it when a hand touched his collar. Panic makes poor notes.

“Vandael,” Hugo called.

I was taping two fingers together on the edge of the mat. “Yes?”

“Take him.”

Marc looked at me with immediate apology. “I’m very new.”

“I guessed from the trousers.”

He looked down. “They’re too long.”

“They will teach humility before Hugo does.”

Hugo heard that from across the room. “My humility is expensive.”

Marc smiled because he did not yet know whether smiling was allowed here. I showed him the grip again. Thumb out. Fingers in. Elbow close. Do not reach with the shoulder unless you want the shoulder borrowed by someone else. He nodded. I placed his hand back where it belonged. He nodded again.

Then the drill began and his body abandoned the conversation.

He stiffened the moment I took his collar. His breath climbed. His hips went square. He tried to solve the whole exchange at once, which meant he solved none of it. I felt the old impulse in my hands: correct everything, give him the structure, make him safe by making him efficient. The impulse arrived dressed as kindness. I let one mistake remain.

“Only the foot,” I said.

“My hand is wrong.”

“Yes.”

“And my shoulder?”

“Also.”

He looked alarmed.

“Foot first,” I said.

Marc moved the foot. Badly. Then less badly. The third time his weight changed enough that the grip became possible instead of hopeful. He looked surprised.

“There,” I said.

“That was it?”

“That was one it.”

He laughed once, relieved and embarrassed. We did it again. Foot. Grip. Breathe. Foot. Grip. Breathe. I did not give him the whole machine. When he asked about the shoulder, I let him ask twice before answering. When he apologized for being slow, I said nothing until he stopped apologizing and moved the foot again.

Hugo watched without appearing to. After ten minutes, Marc managed the entry with enough honesty that he unbalanced me by accident. His eyes widened.

“Sorry.”

“Don’t be.”

“I nearly made you move.”

“You did make me move.”

He looked at Hugo for confirmation. Hugo ignored him. Good. The correction would not belong to Marc if Hugo gave it ceremonial weight. We changed partners.

Hugo put me with Pieter, who had been training long enough to smile before causing trouble. He was my height, thicker through the torso, with good hips and the relaxed cruelty of a man who enjoyed grip fighting the way others enjoyed cards. He slapped my shoulder and said, “Be gentle with me.”

“Of course.”

“I hate when you agree.”

We took grips. The first exchange went cleanly. Pieter drove in, I framed, cut the angle, cleared the line, and reset. He came again. I let the pressure pass over my hip instead of meeting it. His balance opened by a hand’s width. Enough to take, if taking had been the point.

I did not take it. He came a third time and I was late.

The throw did not look dramatic from the outside. It never does when it is correct. The floor left my feet and found my back. Air left me in a short hard line. Pieter held the control for a breath, then released and offered his hand. I took it.

Hugo stood above us with his arms folded.

“Better,” he said.

“At falling?” I asked.

“At not eating the beginner.”

“That sounds like praise.”

“It is not.” He pointed at Pieter. “You carried those hands into this round and got thrown.”

Pieter grinned. “I felt cherished.”

“Be quiet,” Hugo said.

I rolled one shoulder, testing the bruise beginning under the skin. “I waited too long.”

“You disappeared politely,” Hugo said.

I stopped rolling the shoulder.

“Again,” he said.

So we went again. This time I did less for Marc and more for Pieter. The difference was not aggression. It was attention pointed at the right man. Pieter pressured my collar, I broke the grip before his elbow settled. He moved for my sleeve, I took his wrist and turned the line into an angle. He smiled because he felt it coming too late. I did not throw him hard. I only made the floor more believable than his feet.

He slapped the mat and laughed. Hugo gave no praise. He moved to another pair and corrected someone’s knee.

After class, Marc came over while I was putting on my shoes.

“Thank you,” he said.

“For the trousers?”

“For not explaining everything.”

I tied the second shoe before answering. “You would not have been able to use it.”

“I know. That’s why I said thank you.”

He left with his bag held too high on one shoulder. Hugo appeared beside me.

“You heard him?” he asked.

“Yes.”

“Good. Students tell you what they can carry if you stop admiring your own bridge.”

I looked up. He had already turned away.


I had eaten half a bowl of soup while Marieke dissected why my answer to her question about collateral circulation had been technically correct and socially useless. We were in a café near the faculty because her room had become too full of papers and my room had become too full of the building. Her coffee had gone cold while she talked.

“You do that sometimes,” she said.

“Answer correctly?”

“Arrive with a complete object when someone asked for a piece.”

I lowered the spoon. She looked tired. The tiredness had lived in her for weeks, gathering at the edges of her mouth and under her eyes, but there was energy beneath it too. Her work had that effect on her. It used her and fed her at the same time.

“I am trying to learn the size of the piece,” I said.

“I know.”

“You dislike that answer.”

“I dislike that it helps.”

She took the coffee, found it cold, drank anyway, and made a face.

“There is a seminar Friday,” she said.

“Cardiology?”

“Reperfusion injury. Measurement windows. Two visiting people from Rotterdam, one from Zürich, and De Smet will pretend he is less excited than he is.”

“Am I invited?”

“No.”

I waited.

“I am inviting you.”

“Why?” I asked.

“Because you ask better questions than you allow yourself to ask in public.”

“That sounds like a trap.”

“It is also because I want you there.”

She said it without decoration, then looked away as if the table had become too interesting. The sentence entered me more slowly than desire did. I had been wanted in rooms before. I had been desired, tested, corrected, used as warmth, made into trouble. This was different. She was asking me into the part of her life that had existed long before I arrived and would remain if I failed to understand it.

“What do you need from me?” I asked.

Marieke looked back.

“Do not become impressive.”

The answer was so exact it almost made me smile. I did not, because she was not joking.

“I will try.”

“No.”

I waited again.

“Do not try beautifully,” she said. “Just come. Listen. Ask if you actually need to ask.”

“I can do that.”

“Yes,” she said. “That is why I am nervous.”

The café noise moved around us: cups, chairs, a student laughing too loudly near the door, rain against the front window. Marieke put her spoon beside the coffee cup and aligned it with unnecessary care.

“I may also be applying for something,” she said.

I did not move.

“What kind of something?”

“Research placement. Clinical-linked. Reperfusion group. Nothing decided.”

“Where?”

“London, if the funding holds. De Smet says I should stop saying possibly and send the documents.”

“How long?”

“Six months in the simple version.”

“And in the complicated version?”

She met my eyes then.

“That is why it is complicated.”

The spoon was straight. She moved it anyway. I wanted to ask for every detail. I wanted a date, a duration, a map, a column in the notebook that would make the pain behave before it had properly arrived. Instead I picked up the bowl and finished the soup, which had gone lukewarm.

“When are the documents due?” I asked.

“End of March.”

“Do you want me to read them?”

“I want you to come Friday first.”

“All right.”

She looked at me for a little longer than the answer deserved.

“Good,” she said.


Lizzy noticed the change before I named it.

She did not have Marieke’s habit of cutting through a sentence to the bone. Lizzy heard what happened around the sentence. She heard whether I had moved away from the phone while answering, whether the answer had been shortened by work or by avoidance, whether a silence was empty or full of someone else.

Her message came Thursday evening while I was trying to read a paper on reperfusion injury and failing because every third paragraph had the density of old rope.

You are slow to answer lately.

Exams. Building. General collapse.

The reply came after I had read the same sentence twice and understood it once.

That list is missing a woman.

I set the paper down.

It is not missing her.

Then she must be serious.

She is.

The screen stayed empty for a while.

Good.

Then another message.

Annoying, probably. But good.

I smiled. The feeling was smaller than relief and sharper than comfort.

How is Gent?

Horse anatomy is trying to kill me with diagrams. Fien says if I fail, she will become a mysterious widow even though we are not married.

Tell Fien mystery requires silence.

I did. She said you have clearly never met her.

I read that twice because I could hear Lizzy smiling and because I could hear the part under it too. She was happy for me. She was also stepping around something she had not been asked to name.

Don’t vanish into serious people, James.

I held the phone for a moment before answering.

I will try not to.

Then answer when I poke you.

The sentence was too close to Marieke’s, but it was not Marieke. Lizzy did not mean performance. She meant answer the phone. Eat. Show up when old friends say your name.

Plainly, then.

I returned to the paper and understood less of reperfusion than I had before.


The seminar room smelled of coffee, wet wool, chalk dust, and old radiators.

It sat on the second floor of a building that had learned academic seriousness through repetition rather than beauty. The windows were tall and draughty. The tables had been arranged in a square that made hierarchy pretend to disappear.

On one side sat De Smet, silver-haired and narrow, with glasses he removed when disagreeing. Beside him was a woman from Rotterdam named Dr. Vermeulen, compact and brisk, who had a habit of tapping the end of her pen against her thumbnail before asking a question. The man from Zürich was called Keller. He spoke slow English with careful consonants and had the calm of a man who trusted protocols more than weather.

Marieke had told me to arrive five minutes late.

“Why?” I had asked.

“Because if you arrive early, you will arrange chairs.”

So I arrived exactly five minutes after the hour and did not arrange anything. Marieke sat two seats from De Smet with a stack of notes in front of her, hair pinned back, sleeves rolled to the forearm, pencil in hand. She glanced at me once when I entered, then returned to the graph being projected at the front. The glance was brief enough that no one else needed to know it had happened. I knew.

I took a chair near the wall. For the first twenty minutes, I listened. That sounds simpler than it was. Listening was harder when the shape of a problem began to appear before others had finished describing it. The old soldier wanted the map. The medical student wanted the mechanism. The frightened boy wanted to help before someone asked why he was there.

The topic was reperfusion injury after ischemic insult, measurement timing, animal models, markers that seemed precise until the wrong hour made them lie. The language moved between Dutch and English depending on who was irritated. I understood enough to follow and not enough to trust myself. That was a good proportion.

Marieke belonged there.

I had seen her in cafés, in my room, in her study, at my skin, in anger, in exhaustion, bent over lab notes with coffee gone cold. This was different. Here she did not sharpen herself for me. She was already sharp and had work to do. She challenged a measurement window without raising her voice. She asked Vermeulen whether the model accounted for delayed inflammatory response or only the visible peak. She corrected one term when a younger assistant used damage and dysfunction as if they were interchangeable.

The assistant flushed. Marieke did not soften the correction. She did not make it cruel either.

De Smet watched her with the irritation of a man whose best people made extra work and better papers.

I wrote three notes and crossed out two because they were not questions. They were proof I had followed.

Then Keller asked about the timing of sampling after restored flow, and De Smet turned to the room.

“What are we actually measuring if we choose twelve hours?” he asked. “Injury, response, or the comfort of our own schedule?”

A few people smiled. Vermeulen tapped her pen. Marieke’s pencil moved once over her paper. I saw the answer taking shape in her posture before she spoke. I spoke first.

“Mostly the response,” I said. “Or the beginning of one. The injury is already becoming a story the tissue tells through inflammation by then.”

It was correct.

The room turned.

Only a little. Enough.

De Smet looked at me. “You are?”

“James Vandael. First year.”

“First year,” Keller repeated, as if the phrase had arrived in the wrong room.

The assistant who had flushed earlier looked at me now instead of at Marieke.

I felt the mistake before anyone named it. Marieke did not look at me.

“The point is not the definition,” she said. “The point is whether we can separate initial damage from delayed response with the tools we are pretending are neutral.”

 
There is more of this chapter...
The source of this story is Storiesonline

To read the complete story you need to be logged in:
Log In or
Register for a Free account (Why register?)

Get No-Registration Temporary Access*

* Allows you 3 stories to read in 24 hours.

 

WARNING! ADULT CONTENT...

Storiesonline is for adult entertainment only. By accessing this site you declare that you are of legal age and that you agree with our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.


Log In