Nicholas's Story
Copyright© 2025 by writer 406
Chapter 23
Dr. Margaret Whitney had been dodging her department chair’s calls for three days. When he finally cornered her after a faculty meeting, she knew she couldn’t avoid the conversation any longer.
“Margaret, we need to discuss the Carter Seminar,” he said, his tone making it clear this wasn’t a request.
“I’ve already explained my position, Robert,” she replied, gathering her notes with deliberate precision. “I don’t think it’s appropriate. His work is compelling but hardly scholarly. We are Harvard, not a book club.”
Robert sighed. “The dean is insistent. Carter’s second book has created quite a stir, particularly in legal and criminal justice circles. The Philosophy Department hosting him makes sense—his work is grounded in Stoicism.”
“Amateur Stoicism,” Margaret corrected. “He has a little formal philosophical training but no advanced degree. He’s a—” she hesitated, searching for the word that wouldn’t sound elitist despite her elitist sentiment, “—a handyman with a Pulitzer.”
“And that Pulitzer-winning handyman has just helped change juvenile detention laws in six states,” Robert countered. “Sometimes philosophy happens outside our ivy-covered halls, Margaret.”
She knew when she was beaten. As the department’s rising star—youngest tenured professor in Harvard’s Philosophy Department in three decades, with a prestigious book on virtue ethics and a family name that adorned one of the campus buildings, she was the obvious choice to host this seminar. But that didn’t mean she had to like it.
“Fine,” she conceded. “One seminar. Two hours. But I’m not endorsing his work as rigorous philosophy.”
Robert smiled, relieved. “No one’s asking you to. Just host the discussion, introduce him, moderate the Q&A. That’s all.”
That evening, in her Cambridge apartment overlooking the Charles River, Margaret poured herself a glass of Bordeaux and reluctantly opened Nicholas Carter’s second book. She had skimmed “The Excellence of Ordinary Things” when it won the Pulitzer, finding it interesting if somewhat simplistic in its philosophical framework. But she hadn’t touched “Crime and Unusual Punishment: Stoic Lessons from Solitary” until now.
Three hours later, she set the book down, her wine untouched, her ordered worldview significantly disturbed.
Carter’s account of solitary confinement was unlike anything she had encountered in her sheltered academic life. The clinical description of how isolation warped perception, the raw poetry born from deprivation, the philosophical reflections emerging from genuine suffering rather than theory—it was both unsettling and brutal.
As a scholar of virtue ethics, Margaret spent years examining how character is formed through habit and choice. But Carter’s book posed uncomfortable questions about how character could develop when choice is constrained by four walls and enforced routine, when virtue must be practiced in the most extreme deprivation.
More disturbing still was the realization that while she had been attending Princeton as an undergraduate—living in comfortable dormitories, attending stimulating lectures, enjoying the privileges of her intelligence and family connections afforded, Carter had been in a cell slightly larger than her walk-in closet, befriending cockroaches desperately trying to hold on to his sanity.
She was embarrassed. She should have known better. After all, she’d done a paper on “Man’s Search for Meaning” by Viktor Frankl. A study of the Hitler’s concentration camps.
She finished the book over the next two days, then found herself diving into research on solitary confinement, juvenile justice reform, and the emerging legal challenges to isolation as punishment. By the time Carter arrived at Harvard the following week, Margaret had developed more respect for the philosophical underpinnings of his work, if not for its unorthodox presentation.
The seminar was scheduled for Morrison Hall, in one of the smaller lecture rooms that held about sixty students. Margaret arrived forty minutes early to prepare, only to find the room already filling with not only philosophy students but people from the Law School, Kennedy School of Government, Psychology Department, and what appeared to be community members from outside Harvard.
“We may need to move to a larger venue,” her teaching assistant whispered, looking alarmed at the growing crowd.
“No,” Margaret decided. “This was the space allocated. Those who arrive first will get seats.”
By the time she spotted Nicholas Carter approaching the building, a line had formed outside the lecture room, stretching down the corridor and around the corner. She went to meet him, curious about the man whose words had kept her awake for several nights.
He wasn’t what she expected. From his writing, she had imagined someone more visibly marked by his experiences—perhaps agitated, intense, or bearing some obvious sign of psychological damage. Instead, she found herself face to face with a tall, composed young man whose gray eyes registered his surroundings with quiet attention. He was dressed simply in dark jeans and a blue button-down shirt under a sport coat. If not for the shape of an obviously broken nose and the watchful quality of his gaze, he might have been mistaken for a junior faculty member.
“Dr. Whitney,” he said, extending his hand. “Thank you for hosting this discussion.”
His handshake was firm but careful, as if conscious of his strength. Up close, she noticed the subtle markers of his actual occupation—hands that, despite obvious care, were heavily calloused; the way he carried himself, balanced and grounded in a manner rarely seen in academics who lived primarily in their minds.
“Mr. Carter,” she acknowledged. “I should warn you—the turnout is larger than expected.”
He nodded, seemed unperturbed by this information. “How would you like to structure the session?”
His deference to her authority in this setting surprised her. She had expected more ego from someone whose books had received such attention.
“I’ll introduce you and provide some context on how your work intersects with academic philosophy,” she explained. “Then you can speak for about forty minutes, followed by Q&A. Does that work for you?”
“Yes,” he replied simply.
As they entered the lecture room, a hush fell over the crowd. Every seat was filled with people standing along the walls and sitting in the aisles. Margaret estimated at least a hundred and twenty people had crammed into a space designed for half that number.
She took her place at the podium and delivered her introduction—a carefully crafted statement that acknowledged Carter’s impact while subtly positioning his work at the periphery of “serious” philosophy. As she spoke, she was acutely aware of him sitting quietly nearby, his attention neither wandering nor confrontational, simply present.
When she concluded and invited him to speak, he approached the podium with the same measured movements she had observed earlier. He didn’t adjust the microphone or shuffle papers nervously. He simply stood, looked at the audience, and began.
“Philosophy is often taught as though it were primarily an intellectual exercise,” he said. “But its origins were practical. It was originally a tool for living well, particularly in difficult circumstances. What I want to discuss today is not abstract theory but a survival philosophy—how Stoic principles function not in the seminar room but in extreme circumstances.”
His voice was even, neither theatrical nor monotonous, but something about its quality commanded attention. Margaret found herself listening more intently than she had intended, drawn in by his direct approach and the evident truth behind his words.
He spoke without notes, moving methodically through his experience—how the initial shock of isolation and the dark had nearly broken him, how he had begun to hallucinate after weeks without meaningful human contact, how the introduction of philosophical texts had provided not just intellectual stimulation but a framework for survival.
To read the complete story you need to be logged in:
Log In or
Register for a Free account
(Why register?)
* Allows you 3 stories to read in 24 hours.