Bookapy.com is now 'ZBookStore.com'. Please update your bookmarks if you have any.
Hide
Home ยป Forum ยป Story Recommendations

Forum: Story Recommendations

DoOver physics and rationale?

fohjoffs ๐Ÿšซ

This is about the most close I will ever get to having an existentialist crisis. Some DOs I can tolerate. Most are unrealistic and uncharacteristic per the nature of the human animal. I have found only one DO that attempts to explain the physics of the time reversal (and was appropriate in that the MC was a physicist), and that it affected the different parallels differently. And I know of one novel that used the "closed time-like curves" models, popular in the 90s, but the writer failed to explain the resultant paradoxes.

Ignoring the Star Trek stuff, and the published DOs in S/F novels, pure time-travel stories all fail to address entropy, positional issues (space-time simultaneity), paradoxes, and energy requirements.

Where physics is not an issue, due to the spiritual nature (the influence of the supernatural) of the time reversal, I have yet to read a reasonable end-purpose or rationale for inserting the MC into another time-line.

Yes I over-think this shit. But I would like to read something, either on SOL or in published literature, that delves into the physics and rationale for a DO.

A reasonable rationale for a DO does NOT include
- correcting stuff you screwed up
- another chance because you were screwed over
- a reward because of your 'valiant' death

Dominions Son ๐Ÿšซ
Updated:

@fohjoffs

A reasonable rationale for a DO does NOT include
- correcting stuff you screwed up
- another chance because you were screwed over
- a reward because of your 'valiant' death

And what would you consider a reasonable rationale? Personally I can't think of any reason why someone might actually want a DO that doesn't fit into what you have excluded.

Unless of course you are defining DO so broadly that it encompasses basic forward looking reincarnation.

jimq2 ๐Ÿšซ

@fohjoffs

Yes I over-think this shit. But I would like to read something, either on SOL or in published literature, that delves into the physics and rationale for a DO.

Yes, you over think it. There is no known physics that could explain anyone moving through time. Whether to be put back in their own or another younger body, or to be physically moved without changing their body to another time or to have their body rebuilt to an ideal.

tendertouch ๐Ÿšซ

@fohjoffs

Yes I over-think this shit. But I would like to read something, either on SOL or in published literature, that delves into the physics and rationale for a DO.

As far as the physics goes, I've never seen anything that provided a physical possibility of time travel. If you have something in your pocket that does, well, please share and someone can probably make a story of it.

Personally, that's the reason I used magic for my do over story โ€” it doesn't need to conform to known physics. Nor do I try to delve into it beyond that, because, again, there's nothing to hook onto in my knowledge of physics.

A reasonable rationale for a DO does NOT include
- correcting stuff you screwed up
- another chance because you were screwed over
- a reward because of your 'valiant' death

Quite the opinion you have there. There's nothing to back it up except that it's your opinion, so having others tailor their stories to whatever you think is a reasonable rationale seems unlikely.

If you have a rationale your think is worthy, and physics to back it up, feel free to write your own story and add it to the collection.

Paladin_HGWT ๐Ÿšซ

@fohjoffs

Art.

In the 16xx series of "Alternative History" started by Eric Flint, and now multiple authors. The instigation of the alternate time-line is effectively identical to most "Do Over" stories I have read.

The prolog of the story "explains" that an alien species, far more scientifically advanced than we are in the then late 20th century. Pursuing what they perceived as "Art" they unleashed energies that resulted in much of a county in 1990's West Virginia being exchanged with an equal mass of the 1630's Thuringer Wald.

This exchange of mass was merely a byproduct of the aliens ๐Ÿ‘ฝ manipulation of energy in what they perceived as art. That thousands of sentient humans were effected meant as little to them as what happens to ants when we build a building or highway ๐Ÿ›ฃ ๐Ÿ˜‰

The physics, in this series, are "beyond our comprehension.

That seems to me to be the best explanation for such a story occurring.

Replies:   Radagast
Radagast ๐Ÿšซ

@Paladin_HGWT

The Assitis weren't as bad as the Vogons.

Grey Wolf ๐Ÿšซ

@fohjoffs

As the author of a do-over, I do think about this stuff, and I have opinions. They differ considerably, but some might be interesting, so ...

In my case, there is no 'pure time-travel.' The MC 'moves' from a future date to an earlier date, but there is an accompanying change of universe. The universe the story is set in is, definitively (and clearly, very early on) not the universe of his first life.

Does that many the physics possible? Maybe, or maybe not. It doesn't violate causality, because nothing he does can affect his own future. His original universe is off doing its own thing and never the twain shall meet.

Beyond that, my characters are certainly interested in the question of why and how this happened, but they have no more idea of how to answer that than anyone else does, nor does the story rely on there being a non-supernatural explanation.

On this point:

A reasonable rationale for a DO does NOT include
- correcting stuff you screwed up
- another chance because you were screwed over
- a reward because of your 'valiant' death

Why not? Who and/or what defines 'reasonable'? Obviously, if the 'why' is some 'blind' piece of physics that allows for both time travel and de-aging, or for the transference of a 'soul' and 'memories' from the future to the past, that just 'happens,' sans rationale. But any supernatural do-over might indeed have an agent that intervenes for any of those reasons.

Consider a hypothesis. This is absolutely not canon for my story (not even close), just a thought experiment.

Imagine everyone gets a do-over. Every single person. Given an infinite number of universes and a non-infinite number of sentient beings, this is theoretically possible. By whatever rules are established, everyone gets to 'reset' to some point (chosen by whatever means) and try again.

Now, if we presume an intelligent agent, consider modifying it so that it's just every single person who, by some set of criteria we are not aware of, lived a 'significantly sub-optimal life'. Someone who, on balance, loved their life, or who loved everything up until, say, 60, but made a horrible choice then, would hate starting over at a young age and desperately having to try to not squash butterflies left and right just to get to a 'better' life. So, in that sense, giving someone who didn't want one a do-over might be torture, not reward. And our intelligent agent doesn't want to torture people.

Or, consider another do-over hypothesis. Maybe we really are, all of us, living in a simulation. Those running the simulation save the state of one or more characters in the simulation, boot up another simulation (perhaps with slight tweaks), and plop the saved-saved characters down in the new simulation at an earlier age. Entertainment ensues! Years of fun for those running the simulation!

Or maybe we aren't, but the do-over world is a simulation, created by super-intelligent beings who can 'sample' the state of the world in e.g. 1980 and kick off a simulation, but use the state of one or more persons from a later time in their new simulation.

You can go on and on with this. Given sufficiently advanced technology, anything can look like magic, including do-overs. Maybe it's 'Riverworld'-ish. Superadvanced beings build Earth 2.0 circa 1980 and inject the captured state of various people from later for their own motives. What, you say? They can't do that, because the stars and constellations will all be different in some other time? These are super-advanced beings. Their Earth 2.0 accounts for that, and - in the world they've built - the entire history of the Earth is carefully edited so the constellations, location of the Earth within the universe, etc are all consistent.

In those last few examples, the 'reasonable rationale' is 'entertainment value', and is entirely external to those experiencing the do-over. They have the technology to do anything they want with little effort, so firing up a new model and watching it go is a fun diversion.

In my case, at least, I see actually explaining any of this within the story as undermining the narrative. We don't know why this is happening. The characters don't know why this is happening. They are just reacting to a situation in the best way they are capable of at the moment.

While looking at a similar question, I ran across a quote from the original author of 'Groundhog Day'. Paraphrased, he said he struggled for a while with 'Why?' and 'How?' In the end, he dropped those, and he felt it was the right choice, making the story much more relatable to the audience. None of us really know 'why' or 'how' we are here. We have theories that seem likely, but - as a physics professor of mine said decades ago (and as is still true), there are points within the physics-based model of the universe at which the best answer we have now is 'And then a miracle occurred'. You can call this the Anthropic Principle, but that's shorthand for 'We don't know why the heck a number of fundamental constants just happen to have values that support intelligent life. They just do.'

One more note: it's not on SoL anymore, but the story 'Magestic' (spelling intentional) postulates a series of nearly identical universes running in parallel to each other, but offset in time. Someone going from Universe A in 2020 to Universe B in 1980 isn't traveling in time, because those are simply the times at which the universes currently exist. Magestic postlates bodily transfer (and, thus, the person transferred must kill 'themself' in order to take on their identity), but one could do the same thing with information transfer. If so, one can further postulate a series of non-identical (but highly similar) universes with offset clocks allowing any arbitrary number of people to get 'do-overs' by moving 'sideways', not 'backwards'. Implicitly, of course, overwriting the 'soul' and memories of the person who was there before the 'do-over' kills them, but the person experiencing the do-over has no agency in that, and any external agent might choose a time when the 'victim' was essentially already dead, repair the damage, then perform the transfer.

Like I said, I think about this :) And nearly all of that discussion itself would fit in the story, and might turn up there, because the characters certainly care about why this happened and what it all means and if there's a motive behind it all and so forth.

But any answers will likely take a long time to appear (if ever), because they have to actually add concretely to the narrative, and there's something of a history of do-overs that go off the rails at the point someone inserts 'meaning' into the story. Not all of them, but it's happened a fair number of times. The physics-based one to which you refer is an exception, but that's 'baked in' at the start, and the MC is in fact the intelligent agent who caused the whole thing in the first place.

irvmull ๐Ÿšซ
Updated:

@fohjoffs

DoOver = wish fulfillment fiction.
Note the word "fiction".

As Grey Wolf writes, providing entertainment for the reader is rationale enough.

Vincent Berg ๐Ÿšซ

@fohjoffs

Sigh! Yes, this is no 'rational' explanation for time travel, however, I've written a few (most never published posted) which use various explanations for it (since I've always been a 'hard Sci-Fi' author (Sci-Fi based on actual 'hard' scientific premises).

This is hardly a common or even an appreciated genre, yet it's my main focus, and even my fantasy stories tend to be 'hard'-fantasy too (where the alternate physics in a different dimension) dictates what is and isn't possible, and what the complication of using certain forces are).

Given the 'alternate dimensions' premise, the first (not my own) would be that the alternate dimension (such as most Do-Overs involve) involve a similar dimension ('multiple-universe' theory), however it's one that is spontaneously created by some undefined source (a particularly weak premise, I'll grant you, but a common one nevertheless). Thus, those who were transported to that other dimension, recall life before on their original dimension.

The one I use most often is a variant of this, and fairly common in sci-stories, is that there are alternate universes, which can only be accessed by crossing over into an entirely different dimension. A common usage of this is that, for FTL (Faster-Than-Light travel), a ship has to cross from one dimension, where the space between locations is less than in their original dimension) so they can converse it in a fraction of the time. So they'd pop-in to one dimension with few physical obstacles, travel for a set distance, and then 'pop-back' into their own.

Another common sci-fi usage is that, if you sometimes there ARE other things (sometimes many more occupied, habitable worlds) while another is that, one danger of just popping in and out of different worlds, is that sometimes things go horribly wrong, and you either encounter strange hostile entities, or you simply can NEVER return to your own dimension (i.e. you're officially lost in an unknown dimension, having to guess at how to possibly return).

Again, we've discussed that concept before too, yet this isn't another Do-Over premise, it's a "Holy Shit, We're UTTERLY FUCKED!" scenario (which we have discussed). Thus it's not so much a "Lost In Space" ("Danger, Will Robinson") premise, but an alternate dimension with completely different physical properties (i.e. standard astronautical physics don't apply).

Thus, these open a whole plethora of different fictional perspectives, not just for Do-Overs, but for virtually any dramatic alternate story you want tot tell.

awnlee jawking ๐Ÿšซ

@fohjoffs

A reasonable rationale for a DO does NOT include
- correcting stuff you screwed up
- another chance because you were screwed over
- a reward because of your 'valiant' death

All those require the agency of an invisible flying spaghetti monster.

If that happened to me, I'd do my damnest to contact said monster to ask what they want of me.

AJ

helmut_meukel ๐Ÿšซ
Updated:

@fohjoffs

pure time-travel stories all fail to address entropy, positional issues (space-time simultaneity)

You mean back when, Earth, Sun and our whole Galaxy weren't in the same spatial location they are now? Easily solved, just propose time and space are not two different entities but one time-space entity where changing one aspect (space) will only be possible by changing the other (time) too. While we Humans can't change the time aspect โ€“ we just live through it โ€“ does not imply it can't be changed.
However any change of the time aspect of space-time causes the appropriate change of the the space aspect. So you end up back in your own bed in your 14yo body and not somewhere in outer space.
I admit this has more holes than Swiss cheese, but hey it's fiction. If you insist on rational details, you are like those scientists who insisted on the existence of Aether.

Aether (classical element), the material believed to fill the universe above the terrestrial sphere

HM.

LupusDei ๐Ÿšซ

@fohjoffs

Being born in USSR I assume all (human) communication output is eiter deliberate lies or ignorant misinformation by default.

Thus, I do NOT regard do-over scenario to be time travel in any (hard) meaning. Nothing physical is ever moved, just a character's memory is violently updated with information about a probable future scenario, projections

People get hung on the concept of previous live(s) in "another timeline" but that is really a misdirection that is established by starting the story by the death of the "source" character whose memories are then transplanted into the "target" character (a version of younger self, or another being entirely) therefore establishing that reference point as the ground truth. However, it is manipulative misinformation. The "source" character doesn't need to exist for the story to be valid.

The story is entirely confined with the "target" character who merely receives (probable) future information form a source they are manipulated to trust (by convincing them that they received information from a own life in different timeline). Actually, it is impossible to verify that is the case, and likely isn't true.

The key event is reception of information by the "target" character (the "reborn" protagonist of the actual do-over story NOT TO BE CONFUSED BY the older virtual preface protagonist of the "previous" life).

So what's actually going on in a do-over?

Someone wakes up deeply convinced they have just "saw" their entire life from now on (usually a shitty version of it). They are so rattled up with extremely vivid and impossibly detailed vision they may have difficulty to recall current short-term memories. They then use bits and pieces from this vision to simultaneously confirm said vision's (limited) clairvoyance in those exact details and invalidate further parts of the vision due to "changes".

There is no need for time travel to bestow someone with a clairvoyant vision. It could be presented in many different forms. It equally validly could be direct speech of a deity, for one example. It just so happens, that false memories of a "future self" are exceptionally convincing way to dress clairvoyance, and thus we have a do-over genre.

***

ALTERNATIVELY, if you insist on "reality" of the source material, simulation hypothesis is extremely handy explanation.

Don't you do a do-over every time you reload an earlier save of a game? No time travel required from your reference frame (of a deity). The action from a reference frame of an NPC may appear as if the player character has "future" knowledge. Although what's resembling a do-over most accurately is a manipulated save game file.

A simulation snapshot is updated with data from a simulation that had been allowed to advance for more (internal) time.

Replies:   Crumbly Writer
Crumbly Writer ๐Ÿšซ

@LupusDei

Except, most of those "another timeline stories" are based on actual reincarnation beliefs (i.e. where information is passed to us from the 'Great Beyond'). You can argue about how realistic that is, yet it's often a viable element in a LOT of stories throughout time.

And I've also heard similar stories from those who've had one half of their brains die, and them transfer those brains functions to the other hemisphere, and also in research done into brain death, where they've been able to promote the whole 'bright light from the great beyond' by applying the same chemicals which occur during brain death.

It's a real thing, as is the whole 'mind leaving the body', it's not just some vague notion born out of nothing. I've actually know several people who've suffered those experiences (for some odd reason, they all seem to be drawn to me, so make your own assumptions about that). But mostly, since I've actively researched it, I'm more open to honestly considering and objectively evaluating their experiences rather than summarily dismissing them out of hand.

As always, different experiences, different perspectives. Or, you believe what you choose, while I'll believe what I've personally experienced, back by demonstrated scientific observations. So, you can believe them or not, as it ain't no skin off my back. ;)

Replies:   LupusDei
LupusDei ๐Ÿšซ

@Crumbly Writer

Oh, I know. Actually, I do quite strongly believe in reincarnation myself, that and not much else. Or rather, I'm a radical agnostic when it comes to any beyond or higher beings and believe nothing of that is actually necessary. I have had a girlfriend who was head deep into "parapsychology" my sister's best friend went into Hare Krishna for a while (and come back out with the priest she married in tow), etc.

Myself, indeed, I do claim to have memories from previous lives, in a manner quite consistent with the classic eastern... hindu/Buddhist beliefs. But those are from times of long gone past (say, a viking berserker around ninth century, then a peasant girl raped to death in early teens during thirty years war maybe, but that's heavily constructed interpretation of the last two), you can't do much with those kinds of memories, disjointed, fleeting visions. And the technical problems with classic reincarnation, toddler brains can't store long term memories very well if at all, so by age of three or thereabouts you're as blank as they come fresh.

Grey Wolf ๐Ÿšซ

@LupusDei

I lean toward a belief in reincarnation myself, though I can't say it's nearly as strong. That said, I have at least some leaning toward the idea that some people 'move on' to some other stage rather than simply 'recycling' here.

The memory problem is interesting; one has to presume there is some way to acquire those memories at a later point. How? Who knows? If there is something to reincarnate (nominally, a 'soul'), that something presumably carries information and that information can be imparted upon the brain. But it's likely quite limited in most cases, or we would have much clearer proof of reincarnation rather than a number of anecdotes.

And I'm not necessarily basing my writing on what I believe in terms of reincarnation. My do-over starts from the idea that 'do-overs' are possible, within the genre meaning of the term. I'm not at all sure that's true, but it's true within the story, so everything else within the story must proceed from that viewpoint.

Replies:   Crumbly Writer  irvmull
Crumbly Writer ๐Ÿšซ

@Grey Wolf

Historically, that's a mixed-bag. As sometimes they'll remember their past lives, sometimes they'll later recover the memories, yet often they won't. However, the Dali Lama's case in an exception rather than the rule, as it's normally other who seek them out, and just like hypnosis, there's a very real danger of 'projection bias', where you 'convince' the others of what you most them TO remember. (i.e. suggestibility).

I'm not saying the Dali Lama cases aren't true, just that they're incredibly problematic from an objective, scientific POV. (The same thing happens in many, many amnesia cases, where the victim's 'family' often 'projects' their wishes onto someone who truly isn't the person.

irvmull ๐Ÿšซ
Updated:

@Grey Wolf

I lean toward a belief in reincarnation myself, though I can't say it's nearly as strong.

One personal experience has always puzzled me:

One day when I was skipping school (due to a sprained ankle, I think), I found a National Geographic to read. Hoping, no doubt, that it had some topless native photos...(don't judge, I was maybe 12 years old).

No luck there, but I did find an article about Lake Baikal which was slightly interesting. There was a photo of a ramshackle fishing village on the shore, and for some reason I got the most powerful "homesick" feeling I've ever had. Darn near cried.

I can't explain that, and have never had an experience like that again.

I've never been to Siberia, never lived on or near a lake, don't like to fish ... makes you wonder, don't it?

Replies:   Crumbly Writer
Crumbly Writer ๐Ÿšซ

@irvmull

The road already taken or the one never taken? Or maybe little random bits of both? But, I've had vaguely familiar sensations reading the OLD National Geographics. Somewhere but there go I.

awnlee jawking ๐Ÿšซ

@LupusDei

a viking berserker around ninth century, then a peasant girl raped to death in early teens during thirty years war maybe

Sceptics have noted how past life memories are never of boring lives like getting up, going to work, getting home and going to bed - rinse and repeat until death.

AJ

Dominions Son ๐Ÿšซ

@awnlee jawking

a viking berserker around ninth century, then a peasant girl raped to death in early teens during thirty years war maybe

Sceptics have noted how past life memories are never of boring lives like getting up, going to work, getting home and going to bed - rinse and repeat until death.

It's worse than that. You will get dozens of people claiming to have been the same famous historical person (say Cleopatra for example) in a past life. But no one ever says that they were Cleopatra's maid.

Even if I were to accept reincarnation, I'm not accepting multiple simultaneous reincarnations of a single person.

Replies:   irvmull
irvmull ๐Ÿšซ
Updated:

@Dominions Son

It's worse than that. You will get dozens of people claiming to have been the same famous historical person (say Cleopatra for example) in a past life. But no one ever says that they were Cleopatra's maid.

Yet there are kids who remember details of life (and death) as fighter pilots in WWII, and those pilots were never "famous" or even mentioned in publications.

As for all of the Cleo wannabees - that's quite understandable. People who seek attention get more for being recycled "Cleopatra" than they would from being Cleo's maid. What better way to get attention than to claim something that can't be proven to be false?

Note that nobody claims to be the reincarnation of a fat, ugly old hag of a Queen, even though there were many throughout history.

The well-known fact that some people seek attention and are willing to lie to get it has no bearing on whether or not reincarnation is a thing.

Replies:   Crumbly Writer
Crumbly Writer ๐Ÿšซ

@irvmull

Heck, even if they knew they were one of dozens of Cleopatra's maids, who would want to 'upgrade' that to something slightly less humiliating? Thus I see those as more forgivable human frailities.

irvmull ๐Ÿšซ

@awnlee jawking

Sceptics have noted how past life memories are never of boring lives like getting up, going to work, getting home and going to bed - rinse and repeat until death.

That's a weak argument. You probably couldn't tell me what you had for lunch on Jun 14,2008.
On the other hand, if you were in a car accident on that day, you probably would remember it.

Crumbly Writer ๐Ÿšซ
Updated:

@awnlee jawking

Sometimes they are, as I've read about those who recalled being 'dung collectors' or simply struggle farmers barely scraping by. Again, it's more a case of 'selective focus'. We simply prefer it being someone famous, both the person and the public at large.

Note: I mistakenly entered "met" when it first posted, but I've never met anyone who's been reincarnated, simply known people who've seen souls entering and leaving the body. Yet I've always been fascinated by the subject.

But what is more interesting, is when someone claims to be reincarnated, when they're 'recalled' previous-life details were from a cubically accessible gravesite they could easily have visited. ;) Just sayiin'.

Unicornzvi ๐Ÿšซ

@awnlee jawking

The issue with that argument is that people don't remember boring details. If we assume reincarnation was real, people aren't going to remember boring lives (or the boring parts of those lives) they'll remember the exciting/unusual/traumatic parts.

Replies:   LupusDei
LupusDei ๐Ÿšซ
Updated:

@Unicornzvi

Point.

I do have kinda, constructed quite a story about that viking, but even that's his last raid and aftermath, not much else, and what there is, is kinda memories of memories, like flashbacks.

I haven't... it would be interesting someday, to travel looking for those black cliffs... on an island? with a monastery or something. We walked into a trap. I blamed... whoever that guy was, a cousin? I believed he betrayed us, had sent a warning somehow, wishing us, me? dead. We, a few survived, but it was insanely bloody. Then, at home, that guy had taken my girl in the meantime. So I went to his place, slaughtered everyone, kidnapped my girl back, took her hostage, she was mad and unhappy and... god, I loved her so madly, I ate her soul.

... fast forward, different girl, different outfits, different soldiers, uniformed, my point of view is hers... but maybe also her little brother's? More hers, but he's present. To the best I can tell, the violent death was the only notable event in the life of either.

Not how karma is supposed to work, darn too direct, too clean a caricature, I doubt it all for that alone. Constructed, invented... likely.

I have some more disjointed visions that could be attributed to around then and roughly there, but not to either directly. Could be one before those, could be another in the middle with nothing much left. Sailboats in the river, that kind of things, feelings. I get strange deja-vus sometimes, as if I had roamed shores of Baltics repeatedly. Then, I suspect, I may sometimes read place memories unintentionally, not my own, just random recordings, like ghosts, trapped in stones or whatever. Then, that past is long. For some peoples nothing much changed for a couple thousand years, half a dozen even.

Then there's that African kingdom, ruled by a sexy -- and oversexed -- queen. Crazy stuff. And I was, kinda in the court, but kinda nobody much. At most a minor general or something such, a warrior of some kind, but more into politics, and overruled more often than not. Not that I remember much, it's mostly photos and feels I struggle to interpret.

There's some disjointed stuff I highly doubt is from here, Earth at large, I mean, at all, but that mixes with dreams that I sometimes have so super vivid.

And then, my personal creation legend, artistic interpretation of a recurring childhood nightmare. Perhaps... an AI of a weapon of mass destruction somehow won a soul for having doubts. A single suborbital flight of doom roughly over the Nile lengthwise from the south, towards nowadays Iran or thereabouts. But to the left, the Sahara, the great desert as it is now, was all lush green as far I could see in my perfectly spherical vision...

For shit's sake and giggles I have claimed to maybe be the Meleager. A kinda minor Greek mythology hero, sometimes mentioned as one of the Argonauts, but more famous for chasing Atalanta and thus the Calydonian Boar Hunt. He allegedly died when his own mother burned the piece of wood his soul was attached to. But as the myths go, there's quite few inconsistencies. And no, I'm not at all versed in that lore, but if I have to pick, it kinda rhymes.

Replies:   Unicornzvi  Radagast
Unicornzvi ๐Ÿšซ

@LupusDei

Those sound like interesting stories.
Given how fallible memories are, the setting that seemingly isn't on earth is how I'd expect people to remember any previous lives they had - remembering some information, but with the background so distorted as to be fantastical.

Radagast ๐Ÿšซ

@LupusDei

The Sahara was green not that long ago. One theory is there was a change in the earth's polar tilt compared to the sun, ending it. Herodotus was aware of the green Sahara.
Perhaps your sub orbital weapon was used, impacting in what is now the Hiawatha Crater, tilting the earth, reversing the gulf stream, drying out the Sahara, melting the North American ice sheet and in the worst example of unintended consequences ever, made Portland possible.

irvmull ๐Ÿšซ

@fohjoffs

Very few stories here, regardless of genre, have much to do with physical reality. That's why it's called fiction.

If we take out the ones which violate known laws of physics, and the ones that violate laws of the state, and those that ignore the known ratio of hot women to Walmart Whales, there wouldn't be much left to read, would there?

Michael Loucks ๐Ÿšซ

@irvmull

hot women to Walmart Whales, there wouldn't be much left to read, would there?

The 1970s and 1980s were different. Very different.

Replies:   irvmull
irvmull ๐Ÿšซ

@Michael Loucks

The 1970s and 1980s were different. Very different.

No doubt about that.

Replies:   Michael Loucks
Michael Loucks ๐Ÿšซ

@irvmull

I just pulled out my Senior Yearbook ('81) and compared the number of smoking hot girls to the number in my eldest son's Senior Yearbook ('07).

No competition. About 10x the number of hot girls in my yearbook. The number of overweight kids is 10x the wrong way (this was a rural county east of Cincinnati vs a suburban Chicagoland school).

Replies:   irvmull
irvmull ๐Ÿšซ

@Michael Loucks

True.

But every generation has its Modine Gunch.

Crumbly Writer ๐Ÿšซ

@irvmull

Fiction is always about our shared valued and impulses. As they say, Non-fiction can be as strange as it wants, yet fiction has to feel real, or no one will ever believe it (i.e. theirs a higher threshold of acceptance, and thus a greater need for 'grounding' a story, no matter how extreme, in our most shared human values.

Yet those "Walmart Whales" are all a product of our modern times. Back in those long-ago times, very few could afford to eat well, and those who dared get that fat, were often the first eaten. Sabertooth's always prefer the fattier, slowing moving of prey. Fleet of foot means your genes are more likely to survive over time.

Replies:   Grey Wolf
Grey Wolf ๐Ÿšซ

@Crumbly Writer

It varies with time. For instance, 'Rubenesque' art, where 'large' women were considered the height of beauty. That wasn't all that isolated. People who were heavier were showing off their success. That's also been true in many other cultures (many Pacific island cultures, for instance).

If anything, the idea that 'thinness' is the ideal might be more of a product of our modern times. Yes, being overweight has survival consequences in some settings (the aforementioned sabertooth), but leaders might well be given more food and have less in the way of physical exertion expected. Certainly, one can go back at least as far as ancient Greece and find female beauty standards reflected a larger look. Aphrodite wasn't traditionally portrayed as thin, for instance.

Now, there's a line between 'full-figured' and the aforementioned 'Walmart Whale'. But where is that line, exactly? That's the problem. Some people define a 'Walmart Whale' as e.g. size 6X. Others define it L or perhaps XL. There's a huge difference there.

Replies:   Crumbly Writer
Crumbly Writer ๐Ÿšซ

@Grey Wolf

In the older case, the status was different, as the wealthiest could show off their wealth, while in modern times, they can highlight their better access to finer foods, as well as their access to 'personal trainers' at the beck and call.

In the end, it's all about showing off and distinguishing between the well-to-do and the common masses. Living in food 'deserts' certainly doesn't help.

Replies:   Grey Wolf
Grey Wolf ๐Ÿšซ

@Crumbly Writer

Oh, I'm not disagreeing. The reason is (at least partly) status-related. The point was more along the lines that the average woman in, say, ancient Greece would probably have aspired to be fairly 'well-padded,' not 'thin.' In terms of pure living-in-the-wild hunters (not hunter/gatherers), yes, being thin is an advantage. But on the 'gatherer' side, and especially for women, being a bit heavier is an advantage - more able to survive interruptions in food supply, colder weather, successfully carry a pregnancy to term, etc.

Replies:   Crumbly Writer  irvmull
Crumbly Writer ๐Ÿšซ

@Grey Wolf

Oh, I never thought you were. I was just explaining why, for those who haven't already discussed this issue endless.

I've always been an expert on over explaining everything. Again, there's no off switch on either my motor-mouth or my runaway thoughts. I literally can't corral them, as they have a mind of their own and I'm merely the vessel they've chosen to wreck their havoc. Yet, they still reward me for my efforts, so I can hardly cry over my fate.

I've truly enjoyed and appreciated my 'whack-a-mole' brain. ;)

irvmull ๐Ÿšซ

@Grey Wolf

Yes. That would even be true in the early 1900's. "Sturdy" women were good marriage material, since having lots of kids - like 12 or 14 - wasn't unusual.

Crumbly Writer ๐Ÿšซ

@irvmull

And nowadays, those "Sturdy" women are just as valuable, as they can keep their no-good loser smuck hubbies in line. ;) I've know quite of few of those, and I've always preferred strong women than pushover, dumb broads.

Which, is why I write about them so often. Once more, the more things change, the more they stay โ€ฆ ;)

Grey Wolf ๐Ÿšซ

@irvmull

There's a point in the early 1900s where things change - fairly abruptly - in 'First World Western Culture' in terms of the primary culture reflection of 'desirable woman.' First the 'Gibson Girl,' then the 'flapper,' are a huge change in beauty standards from that of the previous century.

This correlates with an ongoing drop in birthrates (the US birthrate dropped steadily throughout the 1800s and only went up twice in the 1900s - the Baby Boom and the much, much smaller Echo Boom), but the shift in birthrates probably has relatively little to do with the shift in appearance standards (except to the extent that 'heavier' women are more likely to survive a larger number of pregnancies).

There are a lot of arguments as to why things changed, and it's likely not one thing but a spectrum of things.

Replies:   Crumbly Writer
Crumbly Writer ๐Ÿšซ

@Grey Wolf

Actually, having known many women who went through those episodes, most of those more recent 'birthrate drops' are do to women finally decided to have children in their fifties, and then not being able to.

Thus the 'successful birth ' numbers drop because of that, not just because of weight issues.

irvmull ๐Ÿšซ

@fohjoffs

True, but when Rubens painted a nude reclining on a couch, you could still find the couch.

Replies:   Crumbly Writer
Crumbly Writer ๐Ÿšซ

@irvmull

Well stated. Kudos! As a Rubenesque goddess lying flat on her ass her legs over their heads is โ€ฆ well, in certain circumstances, it could work. ;)

akarge ๐Ÿšซ

@fohjoffs

Hmm, not that I actually believe, but as a point of logic, assume everyone reincarnated. If there are one million people in the world when Cleo was alive, and then later in time you are up to one Billion. Logically,there would be one Thousand Cleos.

Dominions Son ๐Ÿšซ

@akarge

Logically,there would be one Thousand Cleos.

No, there's nothing logical about that. How is that more logical than there being new souls over time?

Replies:   Crumbly Writer
Crumbly Writer ๐Ÿšซ

@Dominions Son

According to classic reincarnation theory, there ARE no 'new souls'. The vast majority simply never remember jack squat, which helps, since most of us started as worms, amebas or dung beetles. Given those options, pretending to be Cleo herself sounds better and better, doesn't it?

Just, so consider and chuckle the next time you consider the latest dung-beetle's claims. Any one can claim to be whatever they want, yet it don't make it so.

AmigaClone ๐Ÿšซ

@akarge

Hmm, not that I actually believe, but as a point of logic, assume everyone reincarnated. If there are one million people in the world when Cleo was alive, and then later in time you are up to one Billion. Logically,there would be one Thousand Cleos.

Who says that when Earth's population was a million, there was only a million souls on and around Earth? Could that number not be larger, say 50 billion?

irvmull ๐Ÿšซ
Updated:

@fohjoffs

There's always the possibility that we're all little Marios "living" in a computer simulation.
Scientists and philosophers discuss this semi-seriously.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/are-we-living-in-a-computer-simulation/
And if that was so, every time we die, our code gets reused for a new Mario, and some of the variables don't get reset.
I've made that mistake myself.
Perhaps the Universe and Everything is written in COBOL.

irvmull ๐Ÿšซ
Updated:

@fohjoffs

See Theosophist, Akashic records, and Edgar Cayce.

According to those beliefs, everything (or at least everything significant) is recorded somewhere "off site". Just like Gates, google, and the NSA are doing, except less evil, I hope.

If it is recorded, it should under some circumstances be retrievable. Otherwise, what would be the point?

There are people who claim to be able to tap into this data, and I suspect most are fake.

But the existence of fakes doesn't automatically prove that such a thing does not exist.

Perhaps to do this requires a skill that isn't developed (or is actively discouraged) in most people.

Those sorts of ideas could be useful for reincarnation stories.

What about "time travel" and "do-overs"?

All I can think of is, if it's all recorded, and somehow your tape gets rewound, would you be able to tell "is it live or is it Memorex"?

Back to Top

 

WARNING! ADULT CONTENT...

Storiesonline is for adult entertainment only. By accessing this site you declare that you are of legal age and that you agree with our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.


Log In