Home ยป Forum ยป Author Hangout

Forum: Author Hangout

Movies & Books

JoeBobMack ๐Ÿšซ

In studying writing, I see a lot of examples drawn from movies. I do it myself. But, how much caution should one use in that regard? Movies aren't books, and books aren't movies. We've all known great books that made awful movies, and great movies that spawned awful books.

For example, "Show don't tell." Apparently first coined for screenwriters. But... doesn't it work very differently in movies?

Example number 1: "He looked at her with a sarcastic smile." In a book, this is the author "telling" the reader that "he" was "sarcastic." In a movie, it's a direction to the actor to show sarcasm through a smile, perhaps, if it's crucial, requiring a great actor to make the scene work.

Example number 2: Movies can sometimes get away with two hours of explosions and chases mascarading as plot and character development. The "show" is just so overwhelming with sights and sounds that we get swept along. In a book, that kind of action for action's sake gets old quick. "They went here and did that, then there and did the other, then..."

Are there other bits of advice that work better for movies than for books?

awnlee jawking ๐Ÿšซ

@JoeBobMack

For example, "Show don't tell." Apparently first coined for screenwriters. But... doesn't it work very differently in movies?

Example number 1: "He looked at her with a sarcastic smile."

At the end of the day, everything in a text-only story is telling rather than showing. 'Writing Experts' advocate writing slower, more lengthy descriptions but, if the style and pace of the narrative are such that concision is appropriate, I see nothing wrong with 'sarcastic smile'. I'd use it myself.

AJ

Replies:   Switch Blayde
Sarkasmus ๐Ÿšซ

@JoeBobMack

I'm not a professional writer (neither books nor screenplays), but I always understood "show, don't tell" differently than movie critics seem to.

It was always the simple reminder to not just mention major events, but to actually include a proper scene with dialogue for it. Don't just mention that the hero defeated someone, but create a scene that lets the reader/viewer immerse themselves into it. Don't just narrate how powerful some artifact is, write some dialogue that explains its power fluently.

This way, "Show, don't tell" makes sense for books and movies alike.

Replies:   Grey Wolf
Switch Blayde ๐Ÿšซ

@awnlee jawking

At the end of the day, everything in a text-only story is telling rather than showing.

You "tell" with words and you "show" with words.

Both use words, but they are used differently.

And "showing" isn't description. In fact, showing does away with many adjectives, something used extensively with description.

Replies:   awnlee jawking
Switch Blayde ๐Ÿšซ

@JoeBobMack

I think writing in Deep POV is more like a movie.

awnlee jawking ๐Ÿšซ

@Switch Blayde

You "tell" with words and you "show" with words.

That's 'Writing Expert' orthodoxy but it's not my opinion.

AJ

Replies:   Switch Blayde
Switch Blayde ๐Ÿšซ

@awnlee jawking

That's 'Writing Expert' orthodoxy

Show, don't tell is a technique used in various kinds of texts to allow the reader to experience the story through actions, words, subtext, thoughts, senses, and feelings rather than through the author's exposition, summarization, and description.[1] It avoids adjectives describing the author's analysis, but instead describes the scene in such a way that readers can draw their own conclusions.

The concept is often attributed to Russian playwright Anton Chekhov, reputed to have said "Don't tell me the moon is shining; show me the glint of light on broken glass." What Chekhov actually said, in a letter to his brother, was "In descriptions of Nature one must seize on small details, grouping them so that when the reader closes his eyes he gets a picture. For instance, you'll have a moonlit night if you write that on the mill dam a piece of glass from a broken bottle glittered like a bright little star, and that the black shadow of a dog or a wolf rolled past like a ball."[7]

Replies:   awnlee jawking
awnlee jawking ๐Ÿšซ

@Switch Blayde

Don't tell me the moon is shining; show me the glint of light on broken glass.

That's just telling that the moonlight is glinting on the broken glass.

AJ

Replies:   Switch Blayde
Grey Wolf ๐Ÿšซ

@Sarkasmus

I'm happy with this definition of 'show vs tell', but it conflicts with many definitions.

If something is important, by all means, it needs to be shown - an action story with 'We had a big fight, and I won' is exceptionally flat.

On the other hand, writing three pages of dialogue to cover 'I caught my friends up on what happened on the trip', when the trip itself has been 'shown', is unnecessary 90%+ of the time. Yes, I'm 'telling' people about the conversation, not 'showing,' but unless it's going to become important that I forgot to tell them about thing X that happened during the trip, there's little point in spelling out what I told them. If forgetting X is important, I have the choice of writing it out (omitting X) or simply telling the reader that X was omitted.

Similarly, 'We sat down and ordered dinner, then ate it as we continued out conversation' is very much 'telling', but describing what was ordered, how the waitress looked, how that conversation went, what the food smelled and tasted like, and so forth is likely unnecessary detail most of the time.

'Show, don't tell' applied to major events makes sense, but (like everything else) it can be overdone, and what's important can be buried in a mountain of 'showing' if one is not careful.

awnlee jawking ๐Ÿšซ

@JoeBobMack

requiring a great actor to make the scene work.

Pffft, it's an everyday occurrence.

Just imagine a person trying to tell you how immeasurably hurt they were when someone used their biological pronouns rather than their self-selected pronouns ;-)

AJ

Switch Blayde ๐Ÿšซ

@awnlee jawking

Don't tell me the moon is shining; show me the glint of light on broken glass.

That's just telling that the moonlight is glinting on the broken glass.

But why are you telling that? It's for the reader to draw their own conclusion that the moon is shining (I don't like that example, btw).

"Show don't tell" expects the reader to have a higher reading comprehension. That's why childrens books are all telling.

Back to Top

Close
 

WARNING! ADULT CONTENT...

Storiesonline is for adult entertainment only. By accessing this site you declare that you are of legal age and that you agree with our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.