Please read. Significant change on the site that will affect compatibility [ Dismiss ]
Home ยป Forum ยป Author Hangout

Forum: Author Hangout

An "Uncanny Valley" for OTT Stories?

JoeBobMack ๐Ÿšซ
Updated:

I have a category I call "Over the Top" Stories (OTT). These are stories that are fun because they just go "over the top" in some way. I think of Starfleet Carl's "A True History" series as an example. I mean, the MC has a harem of 20 or so the last book I read (waiting for the current one to finish so I can binge), plays college football like a pro (where he'll be soon, I suspect), and is a "mad scientist." And that's just in his "normal" identity. As a superhero, well... yeah. Over the top!

Another example that I've recently enjoyed is "Lady in Red." The MC in that story is more like Batman, just amazingly good at damn near everything -- football, singing, diplomacy, you name it, he can do it. But what's important to him is the girl he met when he moved into the new school just before his senior year -- the "Lady in Red." Ah, romance!

But, my point here is that it seems to me that, just short of these stories, there's an "uncanny valley" of stories where the MC is too much to be normal, but not enough to be truly "Over the Top." ("Uncanny valley" is a term from artificial intelligence work for androids that are just close enough to human to be eerie and revolting without quite getting all the way there.) OTT stories, to me, are so much fun! But, when an author falls just a little short of truly going "OTT", you get a "Chad" character. Boring because everything is too easy. Too good to be believed. Criticized for all of these, even though the "Chad" character may not be as far beyond normal as the characters in highly rated OTT stories.

On the other hand, there are those characters who are way more interesting and capable than normal, but stay on the human side of the uncanny valley. I'd put Gray Wolf's MC in the "Variations on a Theme" character in this category. (Plus, dammit!, he makes a debater cool! That's my kind of author!)

Anyway, thoughts?

Paladin_HGWT ๐Ÿšซ
Updated:

@JoeBobMack

On the other hand, there are those characters who are way more interesting and capable than normal, but stay on the human side of the uncanny valley. I'd put Gray Wolf's MC in the "Variations on a Theme" character in this category.

I would put the MC in the Stupid Boy/Better Man series by G Younger https://storiesonline.net/series/1080/stupid-boy

At times the character is "Over The Top" but not really in any particular thing he does. It is the totality of events that pushes the boundaries of credulity.

I know that some people believe that David Dawson is Waaaaay Over The Top. Unlike OTT characters in some other stories, everything DD has done is quite possible, even if some of them include being rated as the "Best" High School Quarterback in the USA. DD's "superpower" is Hard Work that is well documented throughout the story. If you have not read the whole story, or don't remember, it may not always seem that way. As the story goes on, much of DD's hard work is "off screen" or only mentioned in passing.

For example, he works out (and does other things) to develop and maintain his athleticism. Initially his workouts, in particular those led by the "Little Ninja" (Cassidy) were detailed quite well, once or twice they were the focus of an entire chapter. He has also had professionals evaluate his performance, and suggest improvements. More often in a Better Man, the "Hour of Death" barely rates a sentence, or perhaps a paragraph. Cassidy too has learned quite a bit from professionals. Starting with a modified USMC workout, several different college and professional experts on conditioning, and body mechanics have mentored her (and David). In a recent chapter, when the USC Defensive Coordinator was particularly displeased with a scrimmage, he merely stated to Cassidy: "Kill Them All!" (A bit later it mentioned "Cassidy seemed to be disappointed that nobody actually dies.")

David has learned from his own injuries, and more serious issues that occurred to others, as well as what has been essential to others success, he has learned the benefits of physical conditioning. As good as David is, he often encounters others who are better at a particular thing. David is competitive, and tries to Learn from most of those encounters.

As a model, it is often mentioned that he is Not the best looking guy (among male models; albeit he is extremely physically fit). Several times it has been mentioned that other male models are better looking. David's "advantage" is a strong work ethic, and a willingness to Do what the Professional photographers (and others) want him to do! Being on time, sober, not harassing the female models (who are usually paid more, and who often are the key to higher sales), and cooperating have resulted in much of his success as a model. This is probably the most believable parts of the story.

His acting success is nearly identical to his success as a model. He has a certain natural talent (and perhaps more important a photogenic charm"), but he accepts guidance from the director (and other pros) and other actors.

DD's achievements so far, are OTT for a barely 20 young man, champion HS football player, and ranked #1 in the nation as a HS QB. Nearly as good at baseball. Playing for USC in both sports, excellent at academics, multi-millionaire, success in business, rated as a multi-engine jet pilot, an academy award, several successful movies, including playing "James Bond's son" and going from a "supporting character" to the Star of a Sci-Fi movie franchise, one of the "top" male models in the world; etc., etc., etc.

samuelmichaels ๐Ÿšซ

@JoeBobMack

Somebody who is Over the Top, but in a paradoxically low-key, tongue-in-cheek way is Ricky of the Richard Jackson saga by banadin/Ed Nelson. I think it's done very well in the first part of the series, although it runs into challenges as Ricky gets older, more successful, etc. in the late part of the series.

samuelmichaels ๐Ÿšซ

@JoeBobMack

Other characters who are approaching the Uncanny Valley, are the Smart Girls of oyster50, but they are mostly cute enough to get away with it. So I think it's not the level of success/ability that can get annoying, but the manner in which the characters interact with others. Humor, self-deprecation, affection, go a long way to avoid Chad-ness.

Replies:   tendertouch
tendertouch ๐Ÿšซ
Updated:

@samuelmichaels

Cindy, Terri, Nikki and Dana were who came to mind first for me, though Cindy and Terri are maybe pushing over the top status.

That sort of character is why I quit reading Starfleet Carl's series and 'The Lady in Red', as well as some others I'm not remembering at the moment.

StarFleet Carl ๐Ÿšซ
Updated:

@JoeBobMack

Starfleet Carl's "A True History" series as an example. I mean, the MC has a harem of 20 or so the last book I read (waiting for the current one to finish so I can binge), plays college football like a pro (where he'll be soon, I suspect), and is a "mad scientist." And that's just in his "normal" identity.

Oh, I completely agree. But Cal is SUPPOSED to be OTT. That's the whole issue with the Big Blue Boy Scout that Cal references in his prologue, that exists in alternate universes. That version is the same person Larry Niven in 1971 wrote is not entirely sane.

Oh, and he's only got 17 wives. The last 8 are finally allowing their personalities to show now that I'm close to the end of Book 5. And yes, there was a reason they discuss for that.

Replies:   JoeBobMack
JoeBobMack ๐Ÿšซ

@StarFleet Carl

And I think the fact that he is supposed to be OTT helps make the story work. At least for me. And it went that way fairly quick, so I knew what kind of ride I was on.

Lady in Red almost threw me, however, as the MMC started out normal, then amazing at football, then at nearly everything, but no real explanation for why. Then all the others started being amazing, and I just relaxed and said, "Okay. Here we're go. This one is OTT!"

Bit I think some hey stuck in the no-man's-land between "normal" and "OTT."

Replies:   StarFleet Carl
StarFleet Carl ๐Ÿšซ

@JoeBobMack

And it went that way fairly quick, so I knew what kind of ride I was on.

First two lines of the story description:

There was a rocket, but the occupant wasn't a baby. A young man (Cal) is the sole survivor of his planet, crash landing in Kansas in 1984.

I tried to make it as obvious as possible that Cal L(ewis) was going to be OTT, so everyone would expect that and just go with it. I had no desire to nerf him like certain writers have done with the Big Blue Boy Scout. Don't even get me started on the latest batch of movies! (Seriously, Kevin Costner - your character actually said he should have let those kids die? What a dumbass writer - and worse, what a screwed up set of morals and ethics!)

Replies:   PotomacBob
PotomacBob ๐Ÿšซ

@StarFleet Carl

(Seriously, Kevin Costner - your character actually said he should have let those kids die? What a dumbass writer - and worse, what a screwed up set of morals and ethics!)

Which movie is that in?

Replies:   palamedes  ralord82276
palamedes ๐Ÿšซ

@PotomacBob

(Seriously, Kevin Costner - your character actually said he should have let those kids die? What a dumbass writer - and worse, what a screwed up set of morals and ethics!)

Which movie is that in?

If memory serves it is the movie "The Guardian" a movie about the U.S. Coast Guard's rescue swimmers. Sometimes to save a life you must make a choice of letting someone die.

ralord82276 ๐Ÿšซ

@PotomacBob

"Man of Steel"
from flashback scene - after young Clark saves entire school bus of his classmates after it goes off a bridge into a river, a classmate's mother discusses it with Clark's parents describing his actions as an "act of God" and not normal. Then his father (Costner) talks to him outside about having previously told him to keep his abilities hidden, to not do things like that. His response was "What was I supposed to do? Just let them die?"

Replies:   StarFleet Carl
StarFleet Carl ๐Ÿšซ

@ralord82276

Yep. The whole point being that his secret was more important than innocent lives - or the life of someone who he was supposed to love, because that man had raised him.

While completely ignoring the minor detail there was absolutely NOTHING anyone on Earth actually COULD do to hurt him, without actually hurting the people he cared for. In which case, congratulations, whoever did it is screwed, blued, and tattooed.

Grey Wolf ๐Ÿšซ

@JoeBobMack

Thanks for the kudos on my MC (and the others, presumably - hopefully they're not in the wrong place). That is a struggle - it's occasionally hard to rein the desire to overdo it, nor create stupid reasons for limitations.

One of the advantages is that people expect characters in do-overs to be capable, at least in some ways, though I got a lot of grief in the early days on that because people expected him to launch immediately into making lots of money and changing the world.

I agree that the OTT hero can be more interesting than ones who are somewhat more limited but not limited enough. But, then, that's always going to be an eye-of-the-beholder situation.

Replies:   JoeBobMack
JoeBobMack ๐Ÿšซ

@Grey Wolf

You're welcome. Kudos are well deserved.

I think I get the challenge of not going OTT when you've decided to stay on the "ordinary" side of the line. The fun is in flirting with it, and it's easy to get sucked into too much. I'm writing a story where magic enters the world and I'm trying to keep it from being "magic does it all" and more about human strengths and unique capacities. But, "too much" seems cool when the idea first crops up! And, anyway, it's got to be more-than-normal, but how much? As you said, eye of the beholder!

Replies:   Grey Wolf
Grey Wolf ๐Ÿšซ

@JoeBobMack

There are so many temptations. SoL is full of 'harem' stories. I intentionally didn't set out to do that, open relationships notwithstanding. Then one tried to form nevertheless before I shooed it away. Similarly, there's always a temptation to let the characters you love win at everything they do and solve every problem with their charm and wit.

I've got enough winning and enough solving. Too much is too much.

Unless, of course, you're from Krypton and living on Earth. In that case, I agree, too much is basically par for the course.

Replies:   StarFleet Carl
StarFleet Carl ๐Ÿšซ

@Grey Wolf

par for the course.

In one comic, the Big Blue Boy Scout used a putter and still shot 18 for 18 holes.

Replies:   helmut_meukel  Grey Wolf
helmut_meukel ๐Ÿšซ

@StarFleet Carl

In one comic, the Big Blue Boy Scout used a putter and still shot 18 for 18 holes

He probably took it literally when someone tried to explain golf to him: "and finally you take the putter to sink the ball in the hole".
:)

HM.

Grey Wolf ๐Ÿšซ

@StarFleet Carl

He should've calculated the whole thing and made one shot that went into each hole in turn, rattled around, then flew out and went on to the next one ;)

Insufficiently OTT!

Replies:   palamedes
palamedes ๐Ÿšซ

@Grey Wolf

He should've calculated the whole thing and made one shot that went into each hole in turn, rattled around, then flew out and went on to the next one ;)

Insufficiently OTT!

There is a rule in golf about that and what you suggest while cool would not count.

RULE 13.2c
If a player's ball comes to rest against the flagstick left in the hole:

If any part of the ball is in the hole below the surface of the putting green, the ball is treated as holed even if the entire ball is not below the surface.

If no part of the ball is in the hole below the surface of the putting green:

The ball is not holed and must be played as it lies.

norefund ๐Ÿšซ

@JoeBobMack

I can't recall ever fully engaging with a story with an OTT protagonist, be it a superpower/fantasy variety character or just excessively blessed*. I find that kind of thing a bit tiresome. I would say I am no longer in the right age range for comic book-style characters but then again, well, look at the popularity of that sort of thing. The idea that comic books are for kids has apparently been dispensed with.

* Notwithstanding sexually of course. I mean, if you reading a sex story and the guy (and the girls he is bedding) aren't unbelievably good at sex, what's even the point?!

The thing I wanted to point out is that there is another OTT-type protagonist that regularly turns up in the work of online writers. He, or occasionally she, may not be blessed with extraordinary athleticism or astounding proficiency in a wide range of skills, but, he/she will be remarkably intelligent and enlightened. You will recognise him because even as a boy in his mid-teens, he will be dispensing sage advice to the other kids around him and resolving the financial and emotional hurdles faced by adults in his circle.

Another tell-tale indication is that the young man will often be fond of a certain kind of cod-libertarian philosophical musings, so much so that one might mistake him for a middle-aged author of online erotica.

Replies:   Michael Loucks
Michael Loucks ๐Ÿšซ

@norefund

Another tell-tale indication is that the young man will often be fond of a certain kind of cod-libertarian philosophical musings, so much so that one might mistake him for a middle-aged author of online erotica.

My RL kids were espousing libertarian philosophy by their mid-teens (and my eldest by the time he was 10).

Replies:   tendertouch  norefund
tendertouch ๐Ÿšซ

@Michael Loucks

I wondered when I first saw that. I tend to think of children as perfect sponges for the right-wing libertarian ideal since they're largely already so self-centered. A philosophy that caters to me, me, me is right up their alley. I had my own flirtation with it when I was in high school, but I grew out of it.

Replies:   Michael Loucks
Michael Loucks ๐Ÿšซ
Updated:

@tendertouch

Given the general ban on divisive political discussions, I'll simply politely disagree that the libertarianism espoused by my kids (and me) is 'right wing' or purely self-aggrandizing. It's not.

Replies:   StarFleet Carl
StarFleet Carl ๐Ÿšซ

@Michael Loucks

politely disagree that the libertarianism espoused by my kids (and me) is 'right wing' or purely self-aggrandizing. It's not.

Good Lord! How could someone come up with that idea? Unless they consider absolutely everything that doesn't conform to the idea that the state is absolutely correct about everything as being right-wing.

norefund ๐Ÿšซ

@Michael Loucks

libertarianism

Given that I am clumsily to blame for this, I will just say that IMHO libertarian ideology (as opposed to libertarian leanings), is much like left-wing ideology, or any ideology for that matter. It is best left to the young and something one hopes they will grow out of.

Back to Top

Close
 

WARNING! ADULT CONTENT...

Storiesonline is for adult entertainment only. By accessing this site you declare that you are of legal age and that you agree with our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.


Log In