Home ยป Forum ยป Author Hangout

Forum: Author Hangout

I need to vent

TheDarkKnight ๐Ÿšซ

What makes readers rate a story based on just the first chapter? It should be obvious that it's an introduction. I feel like any respected reviewer wouldn't rate a book based on the introduction alone.

My latest story has a terrible score so far, based on a very short introductory chapter, and since scores are about the only feedback we get, it's annoying. If I truly thought it was bad or even so-so (I'll admit to having written several of those), it wouldn't bother me. Maybe the keyword there is respected. When I write a smutty little non-serious tale, I deserve what I get.

Oh well, only 37 votes so far, maybe there's hope after I post the rest of the story.

FantasyLover ๐Ÿšซ

@TheDarkKnight

Amen.

jimq2 ๐Ÿšซ

@TheDarkKnight

Fiction, True Story,

While we are venting, don't you just love authors who can't decide what a story really is? That quote is from the tags on a story posted today. I've seen that several times lately.

madnige ๐Ÿšซ

@TheDarkKnight

What makes readers rate a story based on just the first chapter?

What makes you think they've actually read any of it? It's well established that the early votes on a story tend to the extremes, usually ones (I call them Unibombers), and the first votes can be cast in just a few seconds of the story being posted, so obviously nothing to do with the story content. This is what the 'trim the top and bottom 5% of scores' is supposed to deal with along with the 'min 20 votes', but there seem to be enough spoiler votes that it affects the early scores anyway. When you hit 40 votes, an extra top and bottom score will be discarded, and I bet you'll get a jump in score. This will continue each 20 votes (with the score jumps getting smaller each time) until all the spoilers are eliminated, at which time you will have a reasonably representative score.

FantasyLover ๐Ÿšซ

@madnige

I wonder how many people don't read the story since it has such a low initial score.

TheDarkKnight ๐Ÿšซ

@madnige

When you hit 40 votes, an extra top and bottom score will be discarded, and I bet you'll get a jump in score. This will continue each 20 votes (with the score jumps getting smaller each time)

Thanks, I forgot about that.

Bondi Beach ๐Ÿšซ

@madnige

What makes you think they've actually read any of it? It's well established that the early votes on a story tend to the extremes, usually ones (I call them Unibombers)

Unibombers are an evergreen topic in the chat. I understand the concept, and I understand the theory that in doing so they may be attempting to protect a favorite author from being overtaken.

Given the frequency of 1-bombing reported, have they got a grievance with every other author?

~ JBB

Replies:   madnige
madnige ๐Ÿšซ

@Bondi Beach

Given the frequency of 1-bombing reported, have they got a grievance with every other author?

I see four reasons for extreme scores (not related to story quality) given without reading, two author-specific and two not.

#1: Fanbois giving 10 to a favourite author

#2: Antifans unibombing a most-hated author

You might think that #1 & #2 cancel each other, but I think that those who would award scores like this would have more authors hated than loved, if only because the loved authors are such a small proportion of the total.

#3: Intolerant bigots who unibomb based on hated story tags - no counter to this one as loved story tags would cause the story to be read, then scored appropriately. Note that some 'readers' may move authors into category #2 above if they see their squick tags too often.

#4: Selfish bastards who are trying to boost some author/story scores by downmarking everyone else (or a goodly proportion of them). The skewing applied to make the displayed site average be 6.0 (or whatever) uses the average of all story scores in a scoring period, so if that average is depressed, then the displayed score for a non-depressed story will be slightly higher.

So four reasons, three of which lead to unibombing; no grievance at all required for #4. The only counter, to all of these, is to have more proper votes - so please vote on every story you read, including downvoting stories that you start then abandon.

awnlee jawking ๐Ÿšซ

@madnige

#1: Fanbois giving 10 to a favourite author

From when vote profiles were available, most stories had a nice smooth curve, although off-centre from a normal distribution. An unpopular author would have a small peak at 1, usually lower than the peak of the curve. A popular author would have a massive peak at 10 that dwarfed the peak of the curve. In my opinion, fanbois cause more of a distortion than antifans.

AJ

Replies:   FantasyLover
FantasyLover ๐Ÿšซ

@awnlee jawking

fanbois cause more of a distortion than antifans.

Is it a distortion if they like the story and give it a high score?

Replies:   awnlee jawking
awnlee jawking ๐Ÿšซ
Updated:

@FantasyLover

Is it a distortion if they like the story and give it a high score?

It's a distortion if they give an author a 10 based on the author's previous work, even if that author has only published the first chapter of their new story and, frankly, it sucks.

ETA my opinion is worth exactly what you paid for it, and has no more weight in the real world than any other reader's.

AJ

Replies:   Michael Loucks
Michael Loucks ๐Ÿšซ

@awnlee jawking

It's a distortion if they give an author a 10 based on the author's previous work, even if that author has only published the first chapter of their new story and, frankly, it sucks.

This is why I've been tempted to post an unrelated, non-universe story, under a new ID, to see how the scores are distributed, versus my universe stories with a (theoretically) large fan base.

Replies:   Pixy I  awnlee jawking
Pixy I ๐Ÿšซ

@Michael Loucks

This is why I've been tempted to post an unrelated, non-universe story, under a new ID, to see how the scores are distributed

That seems to be the reason why the likes of Stephen King/Richard Bachman, JK Rowling/Robert Galbraith created pen-names. They wanted to see what their writing was like without prior expectations.

I can see the attraction, as that was the very reason I did the same. For me, it turned out the scores were roughly similar across the board, so a year or two back, I changed the names to add my main account name to the original pseudonyms, with the addition of a Roman numeral to indicate the timeline in which the accounts were created. The higher the number, the more recent the account.

awnlee jawking ๐Ÿšซ

@Michael Loucks

This is why I've been tempted to post an unrelated, non-universe story, under a new ID, to see how the scores are distributed, versus my universe stories with a (theoretically) large fan base.

I'd like to read it, to see whether you can come up with something different ;-)

AJ

Replies:   Michael Loucks
Michael Loucks ๐Ÿšซ

@awnlee jawking

I'd like to read it, to see whether you can come up with something different ;-)

The first 2 full books are available on my support sites, along with a partial 3rd book.

I intend to release the first book on ZBookstore during 2Q26 and on SOL a month later, per my typical release cycle.

AmigaClone ๐Ÿšซ
Updated:

@madnige

#1: Fanbois giving 10 to a favourite author

@ awnlee jawking

It's a distortion if they give an author a 10 based on the author's previous work, even if that author has only published the first chapter of their new story and, frankly, it sucks.

I will admit to sometimes giving a 10 to a new story by a favorite author as a placeholder vote. Most of those cases I have given 10s to completed stories by that author before. Unlike some, I later give a more appropriate vote as the story is posted.

There have been times I've read a story before it was posted here. In those cases, what might appear to be a 'Fanboy' vote actually is based on the version I read before it appeared on SOL.

@ Michael Loucks

This is why I've been tempted to post an unrelated, non-universe story, under a new ID, to see how the scores are distributed, versus my universe stories with a (theoretically) large fan base.

That might be an interesting experiment.

Replies:   helmut_meukel
helmut_meukel ๐Ÿšซ

@AmigaClone

This is why I've been tempted to post an unrelated, non-universe story, under a new ID, to see how the scores are distributed, versus my universe stories with a (theoretically) large fan base.

That might be an interesting experiment.

I read somewhere E. S. Gardner got miffed by a critic who claimed the Perry Mason author could write mediocre stories which will become bestsellers due to the author's fame while an unknown author who writes an outstanding story will even have problems to get published.
So in 1939, under the pen name A. A. Fair, Gardner launched a series of novels about the private detective firm Cool and Lam. Publisher, editor and literary agent didn't know
who really was A. A. Fair and Gardner revealed his authorship only after the series was already a great success.
BTW, I personally prefer the Cool and Lam stories to the Perry Mason stories. I don't know how much of this preference is due to different translators, I never read any of his books in English, only German translations.
(No, I won't again start ranting about translations, not this time!)

HM.

Vincent Berg ๐Ÿšซ

@madnige

Sorry, but I've read several stories that I take an immediate dislike to (descriptive violent rape, blatant racism or, as always, politics, yet I've been attacked for 'creating' fictional characters who express an in-story political opinion that certain readers assume mirror my views (they don't, as again, it's fiction and the characters aren't real).

Those two individuals 1-voted every story I wrote since that period, which rather than dissuading me, only reminded me that, despite downvoting my stories, they were actively reading every single story I wrote within two days of my posting each and every chapter.

Nothing like dedicated enemies who still adore your work. But as they say, politics make for strange bed-fellows.

Switch Blayde ๐Ÿšซ

@TheDarkKnight

What makes readers rate a story based on just the first chapter? It should be obvious that it's an introduction. I feel like any respected reviewer wouldn't rate a book based on the introduction alone.

If that's what the first chapter is, don't post it alone. Post Chapter 1 and Chapter 2 together.

TheDarkKnight ๐Ÿšซ

@Switch Blayde

f that's what the first chapter is, don't post it alone. Post Chapter 1 and Chapter 2 together.

That's what I will do from now on. Who says you can't teach an old dog new tricks?

Michael Loucks ๐Ÿšซ

@Switch Blayde

Post Chapter 1 and Chapter 2 together.

That makes quite a bit of sense. I'm going to consider it for the next universe story release.

awnlee jawking ๐Ÿšซ
Updated:

@TheDarkKnight

What you posted was rather thin and discordant (she must have been 13 or 14 - no wait a few lines, she was 14) with a cliched plot. You have a score of 6.29 from 38 votes, which is better than average. Some of the authors currently on the home page would be delighted with those figures.

AJ

REP ๐Ÿšซ

@TheDarkKnight

Perk up.

Unibombers don't even read the story.

Readers expect similar styles of story from their authors. When the author changes their typical style, the change can upset readers.

Some readers just don't like smut.

Don't let scores disturb you. Many readers rate a story on their preference for the author, not the content. If a reader likes you, they vote high. If they don't like you, they vote low.

I haven't read recent stories, lately. Perhaps the rest of the story will change their minds and bring their score up.

Michael Loucks ๐Ÿšซ

@TheDarkKnight

What makes readers rate a story based on just the first chapter?

This is why I always disabled voting until after 5 chapters were posted. The new rules do not allow this, and I've see the same thing happen, along with comments that make zero sense because the story arc hasn't developed beyond the setup.

Replies:   AmigaClone
AmigaClone ๐Ÿšซ

@Michael Loucks

This is why I always disabled voting until after 5 chapters were posted. The new rules do not allow this, and I've see the same thing happen, along with comments that make zero sense because the story arc hasn't developed beyond the setup.

What might be worse are comments that make you wonder: "Did the author of this comment read the description of this story?" and "Do they realize there are previous books centered around the lives of Steve Adams, Michael Loucks, or Johnathan Kane?"

Replies:   Michael Loucks
Michael Loucks ๐Ÿšซ

@AmigaClone

What might be worse are comments that make you wonder: "Did the author of this comment read the description of this story?" and "Do they realize there are previous books centered around the lives of Steve Adams, Michael Loucks, or Johnathan Kane?"

Bingo. Especially the one who rage quit after reading one comment, without full context, by Doctor Mike.

Bondi Beach ๐Ÿšซ

@TheDarkKnight

When I write a smutty little non-serious tale, I deserve what I get.

When I write one, if I do it well, I expect 10s.

~ JBB

Replies:   Vincent Berg
Vincent Berg ๐Ÿšซ

@Bondi Beach

As always, there are those who read for smut, and those who appreciate plot. I always aim for both, but I've always been a bit weird, as I only write explicit porn to get to the apres-sex scene, where I've found my characters open up, admitting thing I've never imagined about my own characters. Which is literary gold, when the characters even surprise the author putting the words in their mouths.

But for those people who think plot just gets in the way, there's no way to please them if you story does contain both. Those are the people I'd prefer pleading "Please, for heaven's sake, quit reading my stories!!!"

BarBar ๐Ÿšซ

@TheDarkKnight

I feel your pain.

Also some readers appear to change their vote after every chapter as if they are voting for each individual chapter, not realising that we can't really see the individual votes and certainly can't see which votes were allocated after each chapter was published.

It's not easy to do but I try to focus on the feedback comments rather than the votes.

The unibombers are annoying. Also the people who vote down stories because it contains something that squicks them, despite the squick having been tagged. Those people are annoying too.

Dominions Son ๐Ÿšซ

@BarBar

not realising that we can't really see the individual votes and certainly can't see which votes were allocated after each chapter was published.

My understanding is that the system only keeps one vote per story per user. So by re-voting after every chapter they are changing their vote, not adding a new one.

helmut_meukel ๐Ÿšซ
Updated:

@BarBar

Also the people who vote down stories because it contains something that squicks them, despite the squick having been tagged. Those people are annoying too.

I did this a few times, but only to serialized stories were the squick tags were added during the progress of the story. I avoid starting to read stories where the author claims something like "Tags will be added during the progress of the story". Really annoying if he doesn't remove it after completing the story. This lets me wonder if he really added tags during posting or if I will be surprised by not tagged squicks when reading the story.

HM.

Replies:   AmigaClone
AmigaClone ๐Ÿšซ

@helmut_meukel

I did this a few times, but only to serialized stories were the squick tags were added during the progress of the story. I avoid starting to read stories where the author claims something like "Tags will be added during the progress of the story". Really annoying if he doesn't remove it after completing the story. This lets me wonder if he really added tags during posting or if I will be surprised by not tagged squicks when reading the story.

I plan on only posting completed stories, so that notice about tags would not apply. On the other hand, I can see situations where a story might gain a tag or two. One case might be due to a new tag being created. A second case might be readers convincing me that it deserves that tag. A third case would involve a scene being re-written and the tag applying to the new version of the scene.

Vincent Berg ๐Ÿšซ

@BarBar

I've always done that, however I also track how my scores change, chapter by chapter (back when I was still posting stories). I'd love to see those more detailed scores return again, yet I'm guess that's not to be.

But knowing which chapters succeed and which fall flat are useful for crafting your stories and developing your storytelling skills. As otherwise, you're just fumbling in the dark, unable to tell what you can't see.

TheDarkKnight ๐Ÿšซ

@TheDarkKnight

Thanks to everyone for your suggestions and comments. I've learned a lot from this exercise. The most important thing is to stop obsessing about scores. At my age, I have a lot more important things to worry about.

TMax ๐Ÿšซ

@TheDarkKnight

Votes, the most frustrating and best thing. Being a very poorly followed author, I do not receive many votes on stories, but I have noticed that people tend to vote for what everyone else voted. I only noticed this when my stories finally get to the 20 vote threshold, then the number of votes jump considerably. Some stories published at the same time with basically the same read count, have less than the twenty votes and when they hit the twenty threshold, they have jumped to 100+ votes quickly.

Just a vent about fans :]

awnlee jawking ๐Ÿšซ

@TMax

when my stories finally get to the 20 vote threshold, then the number of votes jump considerably

That shows the power of having a visible score.

Even if a reader doesn't really like a story and casts a downvote, they may still be doing the author a favour by pushing the number of votes to 20 and making the score visible.

AJ

Vincent Berg ๐Ÿšซ

@TMax

As others have noted, I won't even glance at a story with a score under 6, and I also won't start a story until there's enough to read (at least five to seven chapters), so between those two, there are many stories I'll never even consider. At a time when there are more and more authors who never get better than a 5 (mediocre, nothing special about the story) score.

Then again, there are fewer SOL stories that I'll even read anymore, and sadly, I don't see that changing anytime soon. As again referencing ASSTR, that's what ultimately killed the site, as the quality of stories decreased, so did its readership.

As I've always said, readers come to SOL for the porn, but stay for the stories.

Replies:   TMax
TMax ๐Ÿšซ

@Vincent Berg

"porn, stay for the stories" - love that.

Out of curiosity, and likely because I haven't poked around the site enough, has there ever been an authors reviewing authors kind of thing? My child has an amazing English teacher who has the students review and comment about stories (anonymously), which has helped them learn to write better, both from others' feedback and by giving thoughtful feedback. I'm pretty sure that I could pay people to do that, but given the $48.25 I have made from my writing, I'm not sure if I could afford the service.

rustyken ๐Ÿšซ

@TheDarkKnight

I thought we wrote stories for our personal pleasure. We choose to share them with others on SOL so that they might enjoy reading them. I see the voting as an interesting indication of whether the story was interesting to the reader. Beyond that it is what it is

Pete Fox ๐Ÿšซ

@TheDarkKnight

Amen. I wore a 2 chapter story post 48 hours apart I had 33 votes before I even got thr 2nd part up. I call it the drive by shooting of ratings. It's very demoralizing. We the writers need more control over when voting begins based in the length of the story.

Michael Loucks ๐Ÿšซ

@Pete Fox

We the writers need more control over when voting begins based in the length of the story.

Agreed. A system tied to word count, where, below a certain word count, you could keep it disabled at your discretion, and have it turn it on automatically past a certain word count.

Maybe 20K words or 3 chapters, whichever is greater, for incomplete multi-chapter stories.

Or something similar.

Vincent Berg ๐Ÿšซ

@Pete Fox

Again, a secret to higher scores is attention, so even with a two chapter story, posting both within the same week will gather more votes than if they're weeks or months apart, simply because they're more visible than the more infrequent stories.

I've also noted that lately, the "New Story" posts rarely have any votes whatsoever, which indicates that no one is actually reading them anymore. As again, with an unclear description and no score to base decisions on, why take the chance?

Which again, was the whole purpose of the various story scores (content ratings rather than just up and down votes).

Back to Top

 

WARNING! ADULT CONTENT...

Storiesonline is for adult entertainment only. By accessing this site you declare that you are of legal age and that you agree with our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.


Log In