@REPJust catching this discussion, but rather than change the attribution term itself, I found that doing it visually by combining the two different ways of indicating thoughts, single quotes and also italics. Thus readers can tell at a glance whether the character are speaking, and when they're not.
Along a same track, I always prefer to inset any conversations that isn't between the same people in the same room (ex: broadcast over the radio, telephone conversations, or even speaking telepathically to another alternate world. The 'in-place formatting' captures those details fairly efficiently.
And finally, the constant "he said", "she said", and "they thought" gets really repetitious after a bit. So now, in most cases, I use "beats" or "indirect attribution".
Based on the 'single subject in each paragraph' emphasis in basic English, that also relates to the speaker. Thus, if rather than saying "Tom said this", if you simply mention what Tom was doing early in his response, readers will naturally assuming Tom's also the speaker, whether they're aware of why or not. In cases of an extended two-person dialogue, the only time you'd then need to state "said" at all, is when it becomes unclear who the last speaker was. In those cases, you simply clarify who's speaking by adding the regular, normal attribution (my editors taught me that, warning me whenever they felt I'd lost the readers entirely!). Yet boy continually shifting between them, it minimizes the majority of attributions, with no real loss of understanding for the story as a hole.
Though another fun aspect of telepathy, which I've used fairly often over the years, is just having the character saying "Hold on, I'm talking to someone else just now," when there's no one else in the room, largely leaving everyone else befuddled, and silent, until he ends his other conversation and then relates what he's learned.
So, essentially you continually playing around with awkward conversational tensions, while highlighting who's really, without any awkward power plays.
Well, I've found it useful at least, though everyone has to want it for themselves, as it's hardly a universal, common technique.