Please read. Significant change on the site that will affect compatibility [ Dismiss ]
Home » Forum » Author Hangout

Forum: Author Hangout

Link between story descriptions and rating

REP 🚫

I find my opinion of story Descriptions and Ratings interesting, and I am interested in how others view themselves.

As an author, I don't care if my readers rate my stories high or low. My interest is in the enjoyment I get out of creating the story.

As a reader, I find ratings are important, but not the main thing I look at when selecting stories to read.

Today I scrolled through the New Stories listing of stories and looked at the ratings and descriptions. The majority of the stories I decided to not read when they were posted have low ratings, in the sixes or lower. One of the surprising things I noted was some of the stories have no rating 9+ days after they were posted – evidently the story was so bad that for whatever reason, the readers didn't rate the story or maybe like me they weren't interested in it.

The main thing I looked at in making my decision to not read a story was the Description. I avoid stories when:

1. The description contains poor grammar because that is a strong indication that the story is poorly written.

2. The description indicates the story is of no interest to me.

3. The description gives me no idea what the story is about. Authors who provide descriptions like 'Read it, you'll like it' apparently have no idea that they turn off readers with that type of description. A reader wants a description of the storyline. Authors who post descriptions that essentially tell readers 'I'm withholding codes because I want to surprise you.' don't seem to understand that for some readers, surprises are not appreciated.

What authors need to understand is, the Description is what most readers use to make the decision to read or not read your story. Your reputation and the story's rating also affect the decision, but not as much as the Description. Many authors seem to spend no appreciable amount of time or effort in writing a good description, and the result seems to be low download numbers.

Dominions Son 🚫

@REP

I noted was some of the stories have no rating 9+ days after they were posted

A story needs a certain minimum number of votes (20 IIRC) before it shows a score/rating. If a story is targeted at a niche audience that could take a while.

Replies:   madnige  Dicrostonyx
madnige 🚫

@Dominions Son

A story needs a certain minimum number of votes (20 IIRC) before it shows a score/rating.

It's 16 (e.g., right now Bebop has a new story up with 16 votes and a score of 8something). Agree that stories without wide appeal could take a long while to get a score - I've seen stories up for archive with the 'not enough votes for a score' dot.

Replies:   awnlee jawking
awnlee jawking 🚫

@madnige

I've seen stories up for archive with the 'not enough votes for a score' dot.

It's possible the author had voting switched off and not enough readers have voted since voting became always switched on.

AJ

Dicrostonyx 🚫

@Dominions Son

Sure, but if a story is targeted at a niche audience then the chance that any given browser is a member of that audience is low, so skipping the story will most likely be the correct choice regardless of rating.

Replies:   Mushroom
Mushroom 🚫

@Dicrostonyx

Sure, but if a story is targeted at a niche audience then the chance that any given browser is a member of that audience is low

And that is often the case it seems. There are a ton of stories that I simply will not read, no interest. And the more like a "kitchen sink" story it is, the less likely I will read it.

Switch Blayde 🚫

@REP

I agree with you. People say it's the cover that attracts a reader to a novel. I think it's the blurb (which on SOL is the Description). I even think the title is more influential than the cover (other than if the cover has a famous author name on it or the name of a famous series character like James Bond or Jack Reacher).

So I agree the Description on SOL is the most important thing in deciding whether or not to read it. Story codes play a role, as does amount of sex and length. And to some degree, the score. With me, I take note of the low scores more than the high ones. The high ones don't mean it's going to be good, but the low ones typically mean it's bad.

But what you said about the Description is right on in my opinion.

Replies:   Keet  awnlee jawking
Keet 🚫

@Switch Blayde

I even think the title is more influential than the cover

Funny you say this since you have have a few stories that I'm reluctant to start reading specifically because of the title. The Nymphomaniac and High School Massacre are two examples. Before reading the blurb everyone first sees the title and that somehow 'colors' what they read in the blurb, at least for me it does and I don't believe I'm so special that I'm the only one ;)

I certainly agree with REP that the description is the most influential thing to decide whether or not to read the story, for all the reasons he mentioned. Many authors should pay a lot more attention to those few words because it affects their reader numbers more than they think.

Switch Blayde 🚫

@Keet

The Nymphomaniac and High School Massacre

Some have said the cover of "High School Massacre" turns them off (my wife included). It looks like a horror story. The funny thing, the story isn't even about the high school shooting (only the first chapter which is the inciting incident), but about finding out who actually did it and get justice.

With "The Nymphomaniac," I was afraid the title made it sound like a porn story rather than a coming of age story for someone with the medical condition. I tried several subtitles for the cover, but was never happy with them. I thought just having the two words was bold. I guess I was wrong.

Replies:   Keet
Keet 🚫

@Switch Blayde

Some have said the cover of "High School Massacre" turns them off (my wife included). It looks like a horror story.

I hadn't even seen the cover so I checked it on Bookapy. That changed my 'reluctance to start reading' to 'no way'.

The funny thing, the story isn't even about the high school shooting (only the first chapter which is the inciting incident), but about finding out who actually did it and get justice.

Perhaps you should reconsider both the title and the cover. I'm sure you can get a lot more readers with a title and cover not emphasizing the first chapter but the main story line. 'The funny thing' is that I won't go back on my decision to not read, first impressions are hard to change. Most readers don't read this forum so they won't either, simply because they have no idea about what the story really is about despite the description. Don't underestimate the power of a good title, it sets the stage for reading the description.

Replies:   Switch Blayde
Switch Blayde 🚫
Updated:

@Keet

I hadn't even seen the cover so I checked it on Bookapy. That changed my 'reluctance to start reading' to 'no way'.

Then the cover actually does its job. The novel is not for you.

It's not a horror genre, but it is a thriller genre with graphic violence. The bad guys are really bad and the hero can be violent to seek vigilante justice. There's a scene where the drug boss strings a naked man up by his arms and two of his men beat the guy with baseball bats, shattering his bones. Then they lower the still alive man into a vat of acid very slowly.

Obviously, there's a reason for that scene, but it's not for everyone.

Replies:   Keet
Keet 🚫

@Switch Blayde

Then the cover actually does its job. The novel is not for you.

It's not a horror genre, but it is a thriller genre with graphic violence. The bad guys are really bad and the hero can be violent to seek vigilante justice. There's a scene where the drug boss strings a naked man up by his arms and two of his men beat the guy with baseball bats, shattering his bones. Then they lower the man into acid very slowly.

Obviously, there's a reason for that scene, but it's not for everyone.

Then the title and cover might be correct after all: they attract the 'right' readers and discourage others.
You should probably add the 'torture' tag for that story.

Replies:   Switch Blayde
Switch Blayde 🚫

@Keet

they attract the 'right' readers and discourage others

Could be. It's my highest rated story on SOL. And even though it's available for free, it's my 3rd best selling novel (on Bookapy and Amazon). The #1 and #2 best selling novels are not available anywhere for free which makes the high sales more impressive.

I have the "violent" tag. The man wasn't being tortured, per se. He was being punished for going against the gang. And it was done to send a message to someone who they made watch. So to some degree it is torture, but not like pulling someone's fingernails out to get them to talk. There are gray areas with the story codes.

Replies:   REP
REP 🚫

@Switch Blayde

There are gray areas with the story codes.

I agree. Not to get into that discussion, but every author assigns the codes they feel are appropriate. The rest of us often disagree with their decisions.

Dicrostonyx 🚫

@Keet

I'd argue that the title is actually part of the description, especially with published (dead tree) novels.

The title acts as the first element of description the viewer sees. Plus, there's a certain degree of marketing in the title; even best-selling authors don't always get to choose the title a book is published under.

Replies:   Keet  helmut_meukel
Keet 🚫

@Dicrostonyx

The title acts as the first element of description the viewer sees.

Yep, that's why I stated

Don't underestimate the power of a good title, it sets the stage for reading the description.

in my previous post.

helmut_meukel 🚫
Updated:

@Dicrostonyx

even best-selling authors don't always get to choose the title a book is published under.

Some examples for this:

Anne McCaffrey's Pern series: Red Star Rising

Red Star Rising, or Red Star Rising: Second Chronicles of Pern, was published by Bantam UK in 1996. For release in the United States the following year it was retitled Dragonseye

J.K.Rowling's Harry Potter series: Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone

first published in the United Kingdom on 26 June 1997 by Bloomsbury. It was published in the United States the following year by Scholastic Corporation under the title Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone.

With translations into foreign languages it's worse, the foreign publishers commonly select other titles, change names of characters, even relocate to other places.

Just some examples:

Bernard Cornwell's Richard Sharpe was named Sharp in German, renamed to Sharpe in newer editions (since about 2008);

Hermione Jean Granger is named
Hermine in German,
Hermiona in Polish,
Hermelien Jeanine Griffel in Dutch,
Hermione Džīna Grendžera in Latvian,
Hermiona Jean Granger in Croatian,
Hermine Johanne Grang in Norwegian,
Hermiona Jean Grangerová in Czech, ...

Albus Percival Wulfric Brian Dumbledore is named
Albus Parcival Wolfram Bertus Perkamentus in Dutch,
- Albus Percival Wulfric Brian Silente in Italian,
Albus Percival Wulfryk Brian Dumbledore in Polish,
Albus Parsifal Ulfrik Brian Humlesnurr in Norwegian,
Baltuss Persivāls Vuldfriks Braiens Dumidors in Latvian, ...

HM.

Replies:   Pixy  LupusDei
Pixy 🚫

@helmut_meukel

I do believe the official term for this is 'localisation'.

My understanding, is that writers get to chose their titles in their home country and that they are 'encouraged' to take the advice of the publisher who employ a 'localisation' 'expert' who makes 'recommendations' on how a story should be changed to fit in with the sensibilities of the target audience/reader within that foreign country.

The trade off with having their story being changed, is the extra fiscal remuneration of having sales within that region.

Replies:   Quasirandom
Quasirandom 🚫
Updated:

@Pixy

My understanding, is that writers get to chose their titles in their home country

Not necessarily. My partner twice had titles changed by the publisher for books that were not work-for-hire.

(Work for hire, where the publisher owns the copyright, you get no control whatsoever, of course.)

Replies:   Pixy
Pixy 🚫

@Quasirandom

That makes sense, as I would see that type of work as being the same as factory work. A factory worker does not get to choose who gets to buy the finished product.

LupusDei 🚫
Updated:

@helmut_meukel

Hermione Jean Granger
Hermione Džīna Grendžera in Latvian,

Albus Percival Wulfric Brian Dumbledore
Baltuss Persivāls Vuldfriks Braiens Dumidors in Latvian,

I don't know why Albus became Baltuss, seems random unless there's some connection or connotation to colour white that got translated into the name. Albus -> albino -> balts (white) -> Baltuss? Possible. ETA: I just noticed the Dumbledore -> dumb -> dumiķis -> Dumidors, so yes, that's it, that name got translated.

I remember the translation received harsh criticism for "childish-ing" the book more than necessary. "Translated" or reassigned "meaningful" names could have been part of that.

But other than that, those are the absolutely closest the given names could possibly be rendered in Latvian while trying to preserve the spelling and observe rules of Latvian grammar that demand gendered endings that could be then subsequently inflected to be added.

Latvian writing is almost perfectly phonetic, the way we pronounce Latin letters adopted through German and we totally don't care how the source language writes the word, just how it sounds. On any Latvian map New York is written as Ņujorka.

awnlee jawking 🚫

@Switch Blayde

So I agree the Description on SOL is the most important thing in deciding whether or not to read it.

In a bizarre coincidence, a new story with a very succinct description has just appeared on the home page, and I bet it gets a lot of downloads ;-)

AJ

doctor_wing_nut 🚫

@REP

I avoid stories when:

1. The description contains poor grammar because that is a strong indication that the story is poorly written.

Ditto. BIG ditto.

If someone can't bother to get through the description without glaring issues, I give it a hard pass.

What has helped me deal with a lot of stories here is to stop thinking of the contributors as 'authors' or 'writers' and substitute 'storytellers' instead. Some have really interesting ideas, and if you heard them recited they might be compelling - it's the act of writing (or typing) them down where many fail, sometimes spectacularly.

At times I wish I could overlook this nonsense, but alas, it's my failure. I just cannot turn my back on seventeen years of schooling.

Some of it stuck.

KinkyWinks 🚫

@REP

When the TAGS are longer than the story, I won't read it.

helmut_meukel 🚫

@REP

Authors who post descriptions that essentially tell readers 'I'm withholding codes because I want to surprise you.' don't seem to understand that for some readers, surprises are not appreciated.

Telling 'tags will be added while the story progresses'
is even worse.
There are some tags telling me "avoid reading" e.g. snuff.
Does the author really expect me to start reading his story when still in progress?
I will certainly wait until the story is completed. When then this 'tags will be added...' is still part of the description, I'll not read his story.

HM.

Replies:   Dominions Son
Dominions Son 🚫

@helmut_meukel

Telling 'tags will be added while the story progresses'
is even worse.

And for readers looking for a particular tag, having it there before that content is posted can be just as off putting.

But yes, that statement does imply the author doesn't have a good plan for where the story is going.

Does the author really expect me to start reading his story when still in progress?

It's unlikely the author knows who you are so has no expectation one way or the other. That said, there are plenty of readers who do read in progress stories.

Replies:   Switch Blayde
Switch Blayde 🚫

@Dominions Son

And for readers looking for a particular tag, having it there before that content is posted can be just as off putting.

That can't be helped. I finish a story before posting any of it so I list all the tags right from the first posting. If someone expects all those tags to be in the first chapter, too bad.

Ron Jon 🚫

@REP

I would say besides score , don't summarize your entire novel in the summary. Hook me with a naughty fun premise in a couple of lines and please don't put 17 story codes down.

Mushroom 🚫

@REP

2. The description indicates the story is of no interest to me.

That is increasingly the case for me, to be honest. More and more often I am finding it hard to find a story that sounds interesting to me. And it is really not my tastes that have changed over the years, it is the stories that are being posted.

Plus it can be hard because to be honest most people do not rate the stories they read. I just looked at the three most voted on storied I have, and less than 1% actually vote. Easily less than .5%.

Replies:   tendertouch
tendertouch 🚫

@Mushroom

Thanks for the reminder on voting. I'm guilty of doing this with multi-chapter stories because I typically wait for them to be completed then just download them, reading them offline from then on. I need to remember to go back and vote after I (finally) read the story and reminders like this help.

Replies:   REP
REP 🚫

@tendertouch

I need to remember to go back and vote after I (finally) read the story

What about waiting for the story to complete, then reading the first chapter online and voting. Usually, the first chapter provides a good indication of the story's rating. If the first chapter is interesting, download the story, read it and adjust your vote if necessary.

tendertouch 🚫

@REP

What about waiting for the story to complete, then reading the first chapter online and voting. Usually, the first chapter provides a good indication of the story's rating.

That would still require setting up a different routine. Besides, unless a story really pisses me off I only vote on stories I finish and there have been plenty I didn't finish after they had a good start.

I sort of wish we still had the 'you voted x' in the story list as it made it easier to go back and cast votes I'd forgotten. I'd see a story I knew I read in the list and no vote, so I'd go put in my vote.

Replies:   helmut_meukel
helmut_meukel 🚫

@tendertouch

I sort of wish we still had the 'you voted x' in the story list

The Details you get when clicking on [more info] do have this as last entry on the right side above the chapters table.
"Voted: YES (8)"

Then go down in the table to the last chapter, click on it, the chapter comes up, click "Bottom" and you can vote..

HM.

Switch Blayde 🚫

@REP

Usually, the first chapter provides a good indication of the story's rating. If the first chapter is interesting, download the story, read it and adjust your vote if necessary.

Not sure I agree with the first chapter being indicative of the final score.

As to your second point, if he currently forgets to go back to vote, he probably wouldn't remember to go back to adjust his score.

Another time a story might not get voted on is when it's available on both SOL for free and Bookapy. After the person reads it on Bookapy, they don't go back and score it on SOL.

Replies:   awnlee jawking  Mushroom
awnlee jawking 🚫

@Switch Blayde

Not sure I agree with the first chapter being indicative of the final score.

Agreed. There are plenty of exceptions. Look where 'Arlene and Jeff' ended up ;-)

AJ

Mushroom 🚫

@Switch Blayde

Not sure I agree with the first chapter being indicative of the final score.

Especially in a long form story.

Most of my longer stories meander a bit, and can end up very differently than they start. Like my current one, where I admit the main character is a bit of an asshole, and that is by design. But ultimately it is about him getting the shit smacked out of him a few times by life in general, and learning to adjust how he thinks about things.

And this is not the first time I have done such a story. It is not unlike one I had where essentially a cheating slut eventually learned some damned hard lessons in life, and in the end changed her life for the better.

I actually chuckled when some wrote me messages saying they did not like my current MC. And all I could do was chuckle, as that was actually a lot of the idea when I created him. He is supposed to be largely unlikeable at the start, because he is a judgmental and arrogant prick.
And because the story is ultimately about his improvement as a person.

And if they hate George, they had better never read the "Thomas Covenant the Unbeliever" series by Stephen Donaldson. The protagonist in that series is actually one of the most foul characters I have ever read in print. Where in the first book after a woman saves his life and heals not only a fatal disease he has but his injuries, he repays her by raping her.

Replies:   Switch Blayde  Pixy  REP
Switch Blayde 🚫

@Mushroom

I actually chuckled when some wrote me messages saying they did not like my current MC. And all I could do was chuckle, as that was actually a lot of the idea when I created him. He is supposed to be largely unlikeable at the start

I didn't chuckle when the Submission Editor of a traditional publisher told me that when I submitted "Sexual Awakening." It was a publisher of romance and she said the main character was manipulative and a few other adjectives I don't remember.

He was everything the editor claimed (in the beginning). On purpose. He was seeking revenge for something the woman's husband had done to him in the past. To him, the woman was collateral damage — that is, until he got to know her and fell in love with her. But the editor didn't give it a chance to play out.

Pixy 🚫

@Mushroom

The same could be the same for the MC in a Tom Holt (KJ Parker) series where the MC goes round making implements out of people. In fact, that was the title of one of them, I think. The belly of the bow.

REP 🚫
Updated:

@Mushroom

Usually, the first chapter provides a good indication of the story's rating.

When I stated the above, it was not intended to imply that the rest of the story would be of the same quality and interest or that the reader could assign an accurate rating.

What I meant was, the reader could make a reasonably accurate judgement in regard to the author'[s spelling and grammar, and the reader could get a reasonable indication of the story's plot.

What the reader could not do was determine if the rest of the story went downhill, measured up to, or exceeded the expectations the first chapter created.

I've read stories that started out great and I gave them an interim score of 7. In some cases, the final score was a 9, and in others the score was 5, or less. When I felt the story wasn't worth reading, I gave it an appropriate rating and deleted the story from my library.

Back to Top

Close
 

WARNING! ADULT CONTENT...

Storiesonline is for adult entertainment only. By accessing this site you declare that you are of legal age and that you agree with our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.


Log In