I have far too much time on my hands and decided to use some of it to look at past reviews and reviewers. There are 123 reviewers listed with at least one review. The most likely number of reviews is one! As an exercise for the reader, feel free to calculate how many reviews there are. The most reviews by far are by FuzzyWuzzy with 656. To my shagrin, my alias barron of ideas is number 7 on the list with 71. However a lot of reviewers have not reviewed anything in 2016 and perhaps could be considered inactive. Fuzzy's last review was in 2014, I just need to live about 20 more years and I could review as many stories as he has. I am not sure if my reviews on fine stories and science fiction (I refuse to call it SciFi, fie on those that won't use SF if they need to shorten the name) count. Probably not. I am the only person to review a SF story on that channel of World Publishing. Or would that be an SF story, SF is pronounced ess eff. I encourage all readers to contact Lazeez the Webmaster and get their credential to be a reviewer and write reviews. Hopefully on stories that have never been reviewed.
I followed a one story reviewer whose last review was in 2002, he may be the first SOL reviewer and found Adventureland a pretty good story posted in 1999 by SueNH one of well over 20 stories. heavy stroke, I probably would never have found if one of her stories hadn't been reviewed.
Search for those golden oldies and write reviews that will bring them back to public attention. We don't need any more reviews of the top fifty stories both the long ones and possibly the short ones, at least if they already have multiple reviews. Break new ground, be the first to review a story you like. You don't have to give it a ten to review it. My theory, developed after deciding I was giving too many tens, is that 6 is a C, average, 7 is a B, good, 8 is an A, excellent, 9 is an A plus, higher than excellent, maybe outstanding, and 10 is very rare. If you give more than one ten a month you have been a very lucky reader/reviewer. On the bottom end where Lazeez prefers you to write the author rather than criticize him and/or his story in public, 5 is a D, low passing, and 4 or less is an F, failed the course and needs to be taken again to get credit. If you consistently one-bomb the stories you review you may find Management will suspend your reviewer rights. I don't know of this ever happening, there are reviews with numbers 5 and under in the past, but if you didn't like it why would you write and post a review? Your reviews, I think, are to offer to other readers information about good stories, ones you liked enough to review, so they can enjoy them too.
Comments welcomed, criticisms accepted because I have no choice.