Just an idle thought after reviewing this Sunday morning's Home Page. Some authors are revising or rewriting their original stories. Should this be an oportunity to review the newish story, even again, if some prior reviewer had done so? I look at reviews more as an opportunity to bring to light something burried in the stacks, posted years ago that wouldn't otherwise see the light of the home page. Since the author has brought it back to the Home Page by reposting a revised version, should we also point it out by a review? It may depend on how significant the change is. Any comments? Personally I'd prefer authors to write something entirely new than keep revising stories I have already read. But I am old and stuck in my ways.