Has anyone managed to save the stories of the author Gulf Coast Mattie before they got "Deleted for Inappropriate Contents"?
Has anyone managed to save the stories of the author Gulf Coast Mattie before they got "Deleted for Inappropriate Contents"?
Odd. I thought all those stories were grandfathered in, and only new stories of that ilk weren't allowed.
Odd. I thought all those stories were grandfathered in, and only new stories of that ilk weren't allowed.
So did I, I noticed something similar a while back, so I asked Lazeez about it.
This is the reply I got.
I would like to keep as much content as possible, while
minimizing the problematic content as much as possible.
For authors that are hanging around, and their stories haven't
been archived, I don't take any action.
But for archived stories, whose authors are long gone, I'm going
through them. If they are worthy of keeping, as in good quality,
good length, then I see if I can modify them slightly to adhere
to the new rules. If they're not worth the bits it takes to keep
them, then I'm removing them.
So it depends. But there is no 'remove all offending contents'
policy in effect.
One of my stories that's also on Lit got rejected by the moderator...after 14 years on the site. I couldn't figure out what was wrong with it since it didn't violate any of the posting guidelines so I just resubmitted it. They posted it.
That author had at least 3 names on the site and dozens of stories with extreme content in violation of the rules including stories posted this year.
That author had at least 3 names on the site and dozens of stories with extreme content in violation of the rules
There is only one rule on content: No sex under age 14.
OK, "rule."
Sex with children from toddlers on up, including sexual torture and killing.
Sex with children from toddlers on up, including sexual torture and killing.
Covered by the "No sex under age 14".
To the extent it's not covered by that rule, teens 14-18, it's not in violation of the site rules.
ETA: The "No sex under age 14" rule is relatively recent. It was instituted due to a change in Canadian law. Older stories were "grandfathered".
The "No sex under age 14" rule is relatively recent. It was instituted due to a change in Canadian law. Older stories were "grandfathered".
"relatively recent" being early 2011 according to my records.
"relatively recent" being early 2011 according to my records.
The oldest stories on SOL were posted in 1999, so yes, 2011, 9 years ago for a site that's been around for 21 years is relatively recent.
ETA: The "No sex under age 14" rule is relatively recent. It was instituted due to a change in Canadian law. Older stories were "grandfathered".
Actually, the 'No sex under age 14' has been in effect for nearly 9 years (since September 2011). The oldest stories on SOL in its current format were posted on July 1, 1999.
By the way, for a bit of history check out
https://storiesonline.net/d/s2/t1732/sol-vs-finestories#po28924
Actually, the 'No sex under age 14' has been in effect for nearly 9 years (since September 2011). The oldest stories on SOL in its current format were posted on July 1, 1999.
9 year vs 21 is relatively recent.
He/she continued posting stories with children under the name Jessica James through this year. I suspect that under the other names, they were posted after 2011. It was not an occasional reference, it was every page of every story.
He/she continued posting stories with children under the name Jessica James through this year.
Our host Lazeez is not omniscient. He can't personally check every story posted.
He has to rely on readers reporting rule violations.
He acts promptly when rule violations are reported.
I just checked the wayback machine. All of his/her stories were posted from 2012 to this year.
As to your comment - I know. I reported it.