Home ยป Forum ยป Story Discussion and Feedback

Forum: Story Discussion and Feedback

"Army Brats" and Kids with parents in other Branches of the Armed Forces

Paladin_HGWT ๐Ÿšซ
Updated:

It is a quirk of mine that I am almost always a stickler for what particular branch of the armed forces a person is in. (Not to civilians who don't seem to have a clue, and are just trying to be polite.) Fellow members of the armed forces, or authors, I am not so tolerant.

I do realize that for some people the term "Army Brats" may be broadly (Ab)used to refer to kids of any member of the armed forces; in particular those that have (or had) to move from instillation to instillation every year (or at most several years) to year. {Standard tours at a particular location for the US Army are 12 to 18 months. However, reenlistment perks, or a variety of other means can result in staying for 3 years or more. I knew of a superb Mess Sergeant who finagled 15 years of 17 years in the same unit! Win a lot of awards, be able to negotiate your reenlistment, and have multiple Generals who enjoy eating in your Mess Hall and "miracles" can happen! I wonder if he served the rest of his career there...)

The blurb for https://storiesonline.net/s/30347/sister-swap by G. Younger says "Army Brats" but is set at the United States Marine Corps Base of "Twenty-Nine Stumps" (official name Twenty-Nine Palms) and the author seems reasonably familiar with the base. It is Possible although extremely unlikely that a US Army Platoon Sergeant might be assigned to a USMC base... In the story it is mentioned that his ex-wife's father is a General... But then why not nearby Fort Irwin, a US Army base (home to the NTC: National Training Center) an even more desolate Hellhole even further from civilization with fewer amenities.

The US Armed forces now consists of the Military Branches of the US Army, US Air Force, and US Space Force, and the Naval Branches: US Navy, US Marine Corps; the US Coast Guard is also a Naval Branch, although part of Homeland Security during "peacetime"...

I have noticed that US Navy and Marine Corps personnel tend to be more anal-retentive about specifying the difference(s) between Military and Naval.

I have talked with (mostly) military professionals from Canada, the UK, Australia, Germany, France, South Korea, etc. (Canada technically is a "joint force" of Army/Navy/Air Force.) (I mean professionals in terms of long service Regulars, not conscripts or others who only serve for one term, and thus are less likely to know or care about such terms.) Mostly it was Army personnel of dozens of nations, and Marines from the UK or South Korea.

I know there are numbers of people on the forums from various nations, some of whom served in various armed forces, or are at least somewhat knowledgeable about them. There are also quite a few people who are "detail oriented" (aka Anal Retentive) about specifics and details.

I have found that "Army Brats" (or Marine Corps Brats" etc. are often more specific about distinctions between the branches and the military/naval distinction than some (many?) veterans. Some members of my VFW Post only served for 2 years in the armed forces, but one of those years was in Vietnam, or 3 years, but served in a combat theater for Desert Storm, Enduring Freedom, etc. Whereas a Navy Brat has a father and/or mother who probably served for twenty years (give or take a decade) and was likely enthusiastic about their branch (at least enough to reenlist multiple times) in particular for the annual Army vs. Navy football game! A military (or naval) "Brat" is a child/teen whose parent(s) were in the service and lived on or adjacent to a military or naval instillation for a significant amount of their lives before age 18, and usually had to move frequently.

I am not "picking" on G Younger in particular. For all I know at this time the kids are "Army Brats" and their father is for some reason stationed at a USMC base. He is usually quite knowledgeable about details he puts in his stories. I concede that the term "Army Brat" may be used loosely. I am asking other peoples' opinions.

I am asking about specificity in terms of the various branches, as well as military vs. naval services/branches; as well as "Army Brats" vs. "Marine Corps Brats" etc.

In my own stories I am very specific about Branches/Services, etc. (except I may have particular characters "get it wrong" when they are speaking).

Mushroom ๐Ÿšซ

@Paladin_HGWT

The actual term most commonly used by those other than in the Army is "Military Brats". I have never heard of or met anybody that was in a military family other than in the Army use anything to signify what branch their parents were in. And most times, it was pretty obvious by where they were.

And the term was also generally used by those who's parent was a careerist. In other words, serving two or more enlistments and not just a single one then getting out. As otherwise it was rare to see them moving from place to place.

And for them it can explain their somewhat strange childhood. Growing up in multiple cities and states, and even countries. Even for my daughter why when we moved back to California she spoke with a soft Southern accent, having lived for the past 4 years in North Carolina. Or that my son was born there, but never had such an accent (he was 3 when we left).

And many simply tend to use that in a self-referential way, as a great many really have no "home town". My dad and his brothers and sisters lived all over the country, from California, Washington, Alaska, Alabama, Montana, North Dakota, and Georgia. None of them ever really had a "home town", as every 3 or 4 years they were moving somewhere else. To them, the military is their "home town".

And in many ways, I am the same. I have moved on average every 4 years or so, the longest I ever lived in a single area was my 10 years in LA after I first got out. But ever since then, every few years I was moving again.

richardshagrin ๐Ÿšซ

@Paladin_HGWT

{Standard tours at a particular location for the US Army are 12 to 18 months.

As an army brat from 1944 to approximately 1962 I disagree. In theory the tours were 3 years except when overseas in places like Vietnam or other combat areas. Then they were about 13 months. Dad was at Fort Monroe and I went to Hampton High School for 3 years from 1959 to 1962 and was a Hampton Crab. Or Crabber. Then he was assigned to the SHAPE mission to Portugal in Lisbon and the family including my sister lived in Cascais about three houses down from the President of Portugal (not Salazar, an Admiral). You could tell when he was in residence, there were half a dozen police outside the house then, instead of the two normally there.

Replies:   Mushroom
Mushroom ๐Ÿšซ

@richardshagrin

As an army brat from 1944 to approximately 1962 I disagree. In theory the tours were 3 years except when overseas in places like Vietnam or other combat areas.

I agree.

Tours are normally broken down as "accompanied" or "unaccompanied".

Accompanied tours are where the family goes with them. And those are typically from 3-5 years or more. My tours at Seal Beach, Camp Lejeune, Mare Island, and Fort Bliss were all accompanied. My two tours in Japan and in the Middle East were unaccompanied.

"Unaccompanied tours" is where only the servicemember goes with them, and those are generally from 6-18 months. And in most of those, the family can actually go with them if it is outside of a combat zone. It is just that the servicemember must pay for them to get there, and all expenses associated with them being there out of their own pocket.

We had a Major when we were in Japan for a 6 month unaccompanied tour who did have his wife fly out and live there. But they were also semi-wealthy so could afford that. Very few could do that.

Replies:   Paladin_HGWT
Paladin_HGWT ๐Ÿšซ

@Mushroom

Tours are normally broken down as "accompanied" or "unaccompanied".

I guess it is a personal "blind spot" that since I was never married, I was always on an "unaccompanied" tour, and so were most of the men I served with (nearly all of my units were only men 1983-2014). When I was in, nearly all tours to South Korea, or Central America were unaccompanied. I also remember the married guys I knew complaining about having to move every 12-18 months too often. Although, my first enlistment I spent the entire time (after Basic/AIT/Airborne training) assigned to just one unit (well, my buddy and I were briefly assigned to several units due to odd circumstances, not the least the shift to the J-Series MTOE) for nearly 4 years. However, that particular unit was unique, being the only unit of its type, and a unique asset of XVIII Airborne Corps. It was the only Corps without an independent Cavalry Squadron, and they had recently done away with LRRP Companies. We were "Jeep" (actually M151A2 1/4 ton truck) mounted recon. I don't think the unit exists anymore. I think it was replaced with a LAV-25 Squadron (vehicles "borrowed" from the USMC) in the 90's; now Strykers.

Most of the US Navy guys I knew complained that the Sea Duty/Shore Duty rotations became "broken" in the 90's and got worse Post September 11th 2001. Marines I though mostly have 18 month tours, except to Okinawa or Saipan, where its is 9 months.

Thanks Pixy, it is cool to learn about the British. The Germans have a different situation now than they did prior to unification. I vaguely know a bit about the Canadians, Australians, and South Koreans.

Replies:   Mushroom
Mushroom ๐Ÿšซ

@Paladin_HGWT

Marines I though mostly have 18 month tours, except to Okinawa or Saipan, where its is 9 months.

Nope, Marines it is still generally 3-4 years.

Now remember, a tour of duty is how long you are assigned to a specific unit more than location. If you join a unit and 3 months later they go to Okinawa for 6 months, that is a deployment and not a tour of duty.

To give an example, when I was assigned to Camp Lejeune, that was for service in the 2nd Regiment, 2nd Marine Division. And while I was there I went all over the place, for 1-6 months at a time. But Lejeune and 2nd Battalion, 2nd Regiment was still my unit that entire time. Wife and kids remained right there.

South Korea now is mostly unaccompanied tours, mostly because of the last 2 decades of increased tensions. I know it was often accompanied in the past decades.

But Okinawa is mostly accompanied, unless you are with one of the grunt units. And Panama was also accompanied back when we had bases there, unless you were only going there for training like I was. But it will still say somewhere on the original orders what it is.

Because people do things like get married as they are stationed places. In one of my stories set in around 1984 the guy is sent to Okinawa for a three year tour, and that would have been accompanied. But as he was not married yet, his girlfriend remained at home with the idea they get married when he returns for his mid-tour leave.

StarFleet Carl ๐Ÿšซ

@Paladin_HGWT

US Air Force

I asked my wife what she and her siblings were called. It was either 'Air Force Brats' or 'Military Brats.' Depending upon the post, it would be possible for multiple branches to be represented, especially if someone was in training and that was THE post where the training took place. When I was stationed at Ft. McClellan, all the branches sent their NBC people there for training. Here at Tinker, there's quite a Navy presence for an Air Force Base.

Also, the blurb has now been changed to military brats.

Pixy ๐Ÿšซ
Updated:

@Paladin_HGWT

In the UK, I think the term is 'Pad rats'/ 'Patch rats'. Pad/Patch being the name given to the married quarters, which generally were/are outside the 'wire'.

Edit: Added '/are'

Back to Top

 

WARNING! ADULT CONTENT...

Storiesonline is for adult entertainment only. By accessing this site you declare that you are of legal age and that you agree with our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.


Log In