I started a story, but did not finish. What stopped me was a line in the story that was something along the lines of - I could tell from the back that she had C-cup breasts.
that's probably not an exact quote but it's close.
really?
I started a story, but did not finish. What stopped me was a line in the story that was something along the lines of - I could tell from the back that she had C-cup breasts.
that's probably not an exact quote but it's close.
really?
I could tell from the back that she had C-cup breasts
I hate authors who do that.
IMO the principle of judging women by their cup sizes shows a lack of understanding of women. Cup sizes vary with time of month, state of arousal, pregnancy, general state of health etc.
AJ
As a well-illustrated proof of that, please see the article here: https://hurraykimmay.com/2016/11/15/9-bra-sizes-fit/
There's more than a grain of truth in what the author said, but just a very simplistic and clumsy way of trying to capture a fascinating subtlety about women's physiques - namely, you can generally tell what kind of breasts she is going to have by the shape of her butt (and vice-versa). It's an aesthetic that eludes scientific analysis, but there is a rule of thumb at work: big ass, big breasts; small ass, small breasts; saggy butt, droopy breasts; pert ass (as typically seen in a female tennis player or sprinter), very tidy pert breasts no bigger than medium; ugly butt, ugly breasts. It's an extremely hard thing to describe without being wordy (as here!), and of course their are exceptions and surprises, some of them pleasant some of them not. Furthermore, I'd go as far as to say if her butt or breasts look nice, her face more often than not is too (but exceptions to this are more common).
I could tell from the back that she had C-cup breasts.
Probably not Cs, but Ds or DDs that'd be possible, because of the indentations those puppies would be causing the bra to make in her shoulders.
First and Second ex-wives were both rather amply endowed that way - 38DD for the first one, 36DD for the second. When their bras came off, they always had strap marks on their shoulders.
And sadly there are a fair amount of those in here.
Given the amount of disabled/physically impaired people in the world, that would indeed be the case...
I started a story, but did not finish. What stopped me was a line in the story that was something along the lines of - I could tell from the back that she had C-cup breasts.
that's probably not an exact quote but it's close.
really?
That is not possible for a C cup.
Now maybe if they were something like a DDD or larger, where the contours might extend a bit to the side. But even then, coming even close to guessing the cup size from the back would be largely impossible.
I recently saw a movie with Candy Samples in it, and there was a shot of her from the rear that showed her boobs poking out the sides even from a rear shot. But she was also a 48F.
Guessing the cup size from any angle is at best just that, a guess.
Looking at her back and guessing the cup size, I agree, it's not possible.
I would go so far as to say, even for DDD, or F, it'd be impossible.
That is not possible for a C cup.
Now maybe if they were something like a DDD or larger, where the contours might extend a bit to the side. But even then, coming even close to guessing the cup size from the back would be largely impossible
One of my favorite porn starlets is "Allie Sin" (she has at least a half-dozen aliases). In her prime from 18-22 she was not quite petite (5'3" tall and averaged a bit more than 100 pounds, and consistently had a "C-cup" bust). She was renowned for nearly "Perfect" Breasts that were Firm, round, and seemingly natural.
She was fit, verging on lean, with a reputation for working out. Only occasionally, such as when she twisted her torso, could you make out her lower ribs. Her belly was flat, in some circumstances when she flexed she had some decent abs. However, she never had a "six-pack" she maintained a "Toned" but not athletic body.
Nor was she some "starving waif" either.
During her prime she was consistently a "C-cup" (~2 1/2" to 3 1/2"), never quite a "D-cup" until her "comeback" as a "MILF"
It was possible to at least glimpse her tits from behind. In both still images and videos.
As a generalization, girls and women who have a "D-cup" or larger are prone to discomfort when physically active; even if they wear a sports bra. Thus, I prefer women who are fit, and have a "B" or "C" cup.
It is much easier to estimate an A through C cups, because the differences are more noticeable. Especially when the woman is reasonably fit.
I doubt I could tell the difference between a DDD cup and an EE cup.
There seems to be two main "schools of thought" on "Vital Statistics" {Height, Weight, Bust (cup size) Waist Hips, etc.} in stories. The "Use Your Imagination" crowd, and the guys who read Payboy and Penthouse in the 1970's and 80's that list the Vital Statistics.
In a sex story I am not pulled out of the story if the character(s) are described like a submission to Penthouse Letters.
As a generalization, girls and women who have a "D-cup" or larger are prone to discomfort when physically active; even if they wear a sports bra. Thus, I prefer women who are fit, and have a "B" or "C" cup.
Trust me, I can actually fully understand that.
In one of my stories I feature a fictionalized Christy Canyon, complete with 36E bust. And even have her give one of her first appearances in porn from her point of view. That is, when one of the scenes had her jogging, without a bra in a light tank top.
I remember when I first saw that scene it did not look comfortable for her, and it was like she kept trying to reach her arm up to hold them in place, and then moving it back down. So likely the director was yelling at her to let them bounce, even though it hurt.
Which I actually put into my story, because one thing that often fascinated me in porn is how far some actresses went into almost dehumanizing things just to be "in the movies".
Everybody who speaks about bra size and cup size should first carefully read the Wikipedia article bra size and then consider what they intended to say or write. I bet very few are aware of the vast differences of the systems used world-wide and the misunderstandings caused by using an expression like "C-cup breasts".
HM.
When I first went to Japan for work, there was this guy that kept talking about his bird's "H Cup Jammers". In person they were what I recognised as a healthy 'C'. Then I had a GF for a while who wore a Japanese 'B', but without it looked like she didn't really need a bra at all.
Let's do away with numeric sizes and be descriptive. Fruit comparisons, a bulging handful, peaked like the soft top of a cupcake with a little too much baking powder, or pouting and round like a decent sized Aubergine.
Ever since I was a teenager, I couldn't understand my friends' obsession with big boobs. To me, if they can feed a baby and feel good to both of us when I play with them, they are perfect. Everything beyond that is fat.
To me, if they can feed a baby and feel good to both of us when I play with them, they are perfect.
Right there with you! That's been my take for the past 45+ years (since age 14).
To me, if they can feed a baby...
There is likely some relationship between breast size and milk production (or at leas the perception of such a relationship by our primitive ancestors), thus a perception that a woman with larger breasts could feed more babies.
I also wonder perhaps about a relationship between hip/pelvic width and breast size. Wider hips likely mean an easier time giving birth, a reproductive advantage in the days before modern medicine.
There may be a perception, but there is no biological connection. Milk is produced by milk glands. Breast size is all about fat. Certainly there is a genetic component to that size, but the actual mass is fat. It has no connection to the glands.
Note, some women do produce either an overabundance or too limited supply of milk, but again, that has nothing to do with size.
There is also no connection between hip width (bone structure) and breast size, although there will typically be a connection between the size of the butt and thighs (fat) and the breasts (also fat). When women gain weight it typically goes to these areas first, unlike men who tend to grow large bellies.
Breast size is all about fat. Certainly there is a genetic component to that size, but the actual mass is fat. It has no connection to the glands.
It has a connection to the glands (gland, singular or even 'glans' if you want to put a spin on it) of the desperate horny mind attached to the the eyes checking them out.
Yes, but why and why is it so common? It suggests that there was at some point in the past some reproductive advantage to it.
I'm gonna make some connections here:
- Big boobs = extra fat tissue = extra ability to sustain caloric output if caloric input is diminished/interrupted
- Producing breast milk isn't dependent on size of boob, but is a high consumer of calories
Therefore...
Big boobs = likely ability to consistently produce boob milk = more success in sustaining young until they can consume calories by themselves.
For the same reason 'child bearing hips' are apparently a hardwired turn on, and logic therefore dictates the 'hourglass' or 'Reuben-esque' figure is desirable because of the suggestion that such a body can produce and sustain offspring fairly well.