Please read. Significant change on the site that will affect compatibility [ Dismiss ]
Home ยป Forum ยป Author Hangout

Forum: Author Hangout

Writing "Authentic" Women

JoeBobMack ๐Ÿšซ

This thread is inspired by comments in the thread "The best story nobody will ever read" begun by Eddie Davidson. As background, I'm writing stories I hope one day to post here, though none are ready yet. My writing is a hobby, done for my enjoyment, and I have no intention for it to ever be anything different. Finally, I'm a man. (Read into th; at what you will; that's on you!)

That said, what does it mean to criticize a story for not having "authentic women"? Notice that I'm not asking about characters that aren't authentic - characters that aren't fleshed out, display inconsistent or contradictory personality traits, etc. (Although, even there, context matters. None of us are as consistent as we believe.)

What I'm asking about is the "man with boobs" - a character that would be perfectly valid as a man, but is inauthentic as a woman.

At one point in my career, I obtained formal pyschological training, though more from the experimental, theoretical side than any counseling orientation. So, I did a little looking before making this post. As a result, I'd say that while there are some well-established basic mental processing and belief differences between men and women, almost any personality structure would be equally authentic for a woman as for a man. Maybe one gender would have that structure more often, but it would exist. For example, there's data that suggest lawyers, especially in the bigger private firms, differ dramatically from the norm on at least five personality components, and that women partners in those firms are more like male partners than "normal" females. So, a skeptical, abstract thinking, get-it-done, woman who found it uncomfortable to start new close relationships and took things personally would be "authentic." Unusual, maybe, but authentic. Even a woman who looked pretty favorably on casual sex (one of the more pronounced differences in the data), would be "authentic."

So, I don't get the criticism. And, therefore, I don't know how to judge my women characters, except as to whether they are internally consistent.

Thoughts?

Eddie Davidson ๐Ÿšซ
Updated:

@JoeBobMack

First of all, let me just say I am super flattered to have inspired this question.

Second, let's just define male gender norms and female gender norms are really what we are talking about. The exception (the unusual woman) that proves the rule is not what we are talking about.

Imagine for example, you asked about an "authentic cat"

I could describe to you behaviors of cats. They like meat - saltier the better. They like to scratch things. They like to be pet. They like to sleep. They like to lick themselves. They like to show you their butthole the first thing in the morning when they are on your bed.

Yeah?

I could probably find you a cat that doesn't eat meat, or does something unusual like swims when most cats hate water. That doesn't mean you are writing an authentic cat by writing that they love water.

Those motivations though are not the metric you should be using to write them. If your intent is to say "I'd write a man or a woman the same if they have the same motivation" you are missing the point.

What you described above "This is a woman who likes casual sex". is an outcome. It is something she likes.

so if I showed you a dog, that likes to sleep and eat meat (saltier the better) and you said "Well, see he processes the world like a cat. So I am going to write him doing cat behaviors"

That's exactly what you just did with the question about women. You showed us examples of women who liked to do things that traditionally men like.

So my suggestion is forget going down that path.

When telling a story as if written from a woman's perspective it doesn't matter if she likes sex, or doesn't like sex. it doesn't matter if she likes to get things done, or is lazy.

There are going to be many different kinds of women with different value system. They TEND to have complex emotions, vulnerability and emotional depth that men do not have. Even your high powered attorney is vulnerable - she is just better at hiding and perahaps is compensating. She may be secretly quite submissive in the bedroom or desiring a mate who is going to put her in her place.

It matters that the tone of your writing reflect that of a woman. This is the subtle nuance that is difficult for men to write.

There is no one voice.

You gave an example of a high powered attorney who goes after what she wants.

What if she was once a silly 13 year old girl who had a crush on her math teacher and had no idea how to talk to him?

Same girl - different voice and values at different points in her life.

So my suggestion is to put yourself into the headspace of who you are writing. If it is 1st person this is easiest for me.

As you describe what this person sees, they are usually not just a man with boobs. Think about what women value and how they process.

There are certain characteristics MANY of them will have, but if you are writing the exception tot he rule then this does not apply.

A wall is not painted white.

It's taupe, or ivory, or ecru or something like that to most of them.

To a man, it is white or maybe off-white at best.

Another good example is clothes. I found a shirt I like. I bought six - one in every color they had, two that were blue in case one got fucked up. I like blue.

This is normal for a man. A woman would usually be aghast at that idea. My values are simple. I need clothes. I like those. They meet my criteria. They are acceptable for work. I bought them - done shopping.

This is not why women shop.

How things "Feel" is important to them. So they will spend more time describing the impact of an event on their feelings about it.

Men will tend to be more direct. "This happened. It sucked. Let's move on."

Imagine when a woman told you a story in the past about her path. Did she tell you just the facts like a police report?

"This happened. Then that happened. He had a blue sweater. He took it off. He stuck his dick in me. We liked it. Later we slept"

Very direct point A to B story telling. Women tend to be more indirect in their story telling and get there by way of including personal observations and wondering about the motivations of the other women in the story. If you listen to them tell you about Janice in accounting trying to destroy them at work - you'll see what I mean.

Imagine you are writing a story from Amy Schumer's perspective. (She is an American comedian if you are not aware). She would tell a joke very differently than Adam Sandler and that is because as a story teller (Which is what her jokes really are - mini stories) she processes the world very differently than Adam.

She does have some qualities that are similar to a man. She was once quoted as saying "I can catch a dick anytime I want. I don't care about my looks". very casually admitting if she gets horny she will get some strange sex.

That's awesome and unusual but what makes her resonate with female audience is she authentically speaks relatable experiences to them from a female perspective.

I don't know if that helped or not but it is not simply as easy as writing "Well, she is a get it done type, so she is going to act, speak and process the same as a man in the same role"

She may want to destroy and dismantle her rivals, while male attorney may simply be happy to remove them as competition and move on.

Hope that helps. Try reading Mercedes Lackey (The author) sometimes and see how different her female characters are.

Replies:   JoeBobMack
JoeBobMack ๐Ÿšซ

@Eddie Davidson

Thanks, Eddie! Lots of good thoughts. Would it be to fair to say that you are suggesting that women have a group of psychological and mental processing characteristics that distinguish them from men and that, when too many of those don't align with the "average" woman, that character can seem inauthentic unless the discrepancy is clearly explained.

I got interested enough to go look up some research and found this 2019 paper that reviews meta-analytic studies on sex differences, cross-national surveys of personality traits, large-scale online surveys, social surveys on attributes related to health and crime, and crime statistics. There's a table at the end that helps convey the summary, including different ways of looking at effect sizes. Very interesting. For example, thinking about your Amy Schumer suggestion, she is unusual (at least from that quote). The data suggests that a randomly chosen male will be more accepting of casual, uncommitted sex than a randomly chosen female over 70% of the time.

Also interesting that circumstances make a difference. For example, the studies suggest that women, though typically more focused on finding a long-term mate, will switch to a more short-term focus when men are in short supply. (Men will switch to long-term when women are in short supply.) Think about this in terms of the hook-up culture on college campuses in the US where men are only about 40% of the population. Another situation where this might have affected the "authentic female" model could have been in the 1920s, especially in Europe, given the loss of male life in that age range in WWI.

I had to go look at Mercedes Lackey's books to realize that, while I recognized the name, I haven't read her that much. I do enjoy Lois McMaster Bujold's characters - both male and female, in her Vorkosigan saga, and her females read as authentic to me, even the ones who are much higher in aggression than is typical for females. I also find her male characters "read like" men to me, much more so than, for example, the male leads in a lot of romance novels who often seem to be "women with dicks."

Remus2 ๐Ÿšซ

@JoeBobMack

Every good writer leaks out some of their personality and thought processes into their works. Sometimes that's very subtle, sometimes it's very obvious. As a result, it's a good idea to get a women's perspective when you can.

Replies:   JoeBobMack
JoeBobMack ๐Ÿšซ

@Remus2

Oh, yeah! Reader feedback. Of course, asking one woman to speak for all women... That's tough. But, I'd like to get feedback as soon as I have some books ready to go.

Eddie Davidson ๐Ÿšซ
Updated:

Another good example is what may be called women logic.

Two men are talking:

Hey, I like this girl. She never calls me.

What are you? Stupid? pick up the phone and call her.

Two women are talking:

Hey I like this boy. He never calls me.

I hate when that happens.

The women are more likely to share their issues and empathize and the men are more likely to jump to a solution (skipping empathy all together) even if one is not requested.

Ernest Bywater ๐Ÿšซ

The first issue is to decide what is and isn't an authentic woman. I've yet to meet two women who behave the same in all situations.

I've had people claim my depiction of the woman at the centre of my story Debt Collection is false as no woman is that way, yet I know the woman I base the character on and she does behave exactly that way. In fact, every woman I mention in my stories is based on someone I know or have meet and interacted with on a regular basis at some point in my life. The same is true for the male secondary characters in my stories.

Replies:   JoeBobMack
JoeBobMack ๐Ÿšซ

@Ernest Bywater

Ernest, yes -within group variations are almost always greater than between group variations. I've read Debt Collection and enjoyed it. I assume you are talking about the ex-wife who borrowed money. Are you talking about her constant manipulation and untrustworthiness?

Replies:   Ernest Bywater
Ernest Bywater ๐Ÿšซ

@JoeBobMack

Are you talking about her constant manipulation and untrustworthiness?

I claim the whole gallon of whisky, not just the fifth!

Yes. All of the other character in that story are based on other people I knew then. Some of them were her real family and some were her friends, and some were my friends. The situations are what are imaginative.

Replies:   JoeBobMack
JoeBobMack ๐Ÿšซ

@Ernest Bywater

She certainly came across as believable to me, at least at the start. As to how she reacted to the imaginative situations, I've got no basis to judge!

Mushroom ๐Ÿšซ

To me, a person simply has to understand that men and women think differently. We can approach the exact same thing, and see it in 2 very completely different ways. I even had a business class about 25 years ago where I proved that.

One of the gals got upset when we were talking about marketing, and she thought it was stupid and pointless to try and market things just to women. She even said that we all thought the same.

I got 2 torso mannequins from the store I worked at, set them up behind a barrier, then asked random people to describe the clasp of the bra on them.

The vast majority of men would call them "front opening" or "back opening". Meanwhile, the vast majority of women called them "front closing" or "back closing". Exact same object and fasteners, yet each gender was drastically different in how they described the fastener.

Men and women do all kinds of things differently. We walk differently, we carry objects differently, and the first trick for me is simply to try and think that way as well.

Replies:   JoeBobMack
JoeBobMack ๐Ÿšซ

@Mushroom

Yes! Marketing is another area that can provide insights. In The Culture Code by Clotaire Rapaille, he describes decades of marketing research that informed many successful ad campaigns. He would basically do small groups to find the "code" (deep belief or pattern of thinking) about certain topics - and they varied from culture to culture. For example, the American "codes" for love is "FALSE EXPECTATIONS," for seduction is "MANIPULATION," and for sex is "VIOLENCE." He doesn't give the other culture's codes for these topics, but the examples he mentions from France, Italy, England and others suggests that they are very different, say "PLAY" for seduction in France.

awnlee_jawking ๐Ÿšซ

@JoeBobMack

And, therefore, I don't know how to judge my women characters, except as to whether they are internally consistent.

My biggest criticism would be for writers whose female characters don't act like human beings. To use gamer language, it's like they're NPCs - they don't have a life, existing only to enhance the 'Mary Sue' male protagonist.

AJ

Replies:   JoeBobMack
JoeBobMack ๐Ÿšซ

@awnlee_jawking

I'd say that for all major characters. I need to have some sense of how their personalities and behaviors make sense in their context, not just for the needs of the plot!

Uther Pendragon ๐Ÿšซ

I think y women are authentic if not always typically feminine. (I once had a college couple where the girl majored in chemistry and the boy inn English.) Sp. I challenged a group I was in to tell whether I was male or female. The reply I got was that one of my male POV stories couldn't have been written by a woman. Not quite my question

Replies:   awnlee jawking
awnlee jawking ๐Ÿšซ

@Uther Pendragon

I think y women are authentic if not always typically feminine.

Be grateful there aren't any trans-supremacists here!

AJ

bk69 ๐Ÿšซ

I'm surprised nobody cited the one technique for writing female characters: "think of a man, then take away reason and accountability"

Eddie Davidson ๐Ÿšซ

This is a classic - and they capture the female voice perfectly in this story. It's a coming age story from a girl's POV.

https://storiesonline.net/s/53917:98393

On writing style and quality alone this is a 10. As a story it is brilliant and full of naughty imagery. The author truly captures the voice of a girl learning to address her own kinks, guilty pleasures, and issues. If this were simply as someone said "A male without reason and accountability" she would just be an irresponsible asshole.

There is much more happening here. A primal desire that is the female condition emerges in her head as she develops into a woman.

I only wish this story had a sequel.

Back to Top

Close
 

WARNING! ADULT CONTENT...

Storiesonline is for adult entertainment only. By accessing this site you declare that you are of legal age and that you agree with our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.


Log In