Please read. Significant change on the site that will affect compatibility [ Dismiss ]
Home ยป Forum ยป Author Hangout

Forum: Author Hangout

One Mega Story or Three Stories with the same content?

Eddie Davidson ๐Ÿšซ

I have been working on a big story for a while.

I have written a few epic stories and they seemed to do well.

This one starts slow and as a result you can see that by chapter two readership dips to about 50% of the original chapter by the third chapter it's about 10%. That's not good. So it goes 3,000 reads on chapter one, 1500 on chapter two and about 400 or so on all subsequent chapters.

The story has three arcs.I had planned to seperate them with "Sections" and post it as one big story.

The first chapter describes a woman's decision to be trained in BDSM by a man she met on the Internet and hows she comes out to her family about her decision. To me, this is a fascinating topic.

The initial chapter I knew would not "Grab" people - I didn't want to do the flash foward 3 weeks then say "Now let me tell you how it all began" schtick.

It was intentional I began with her reasoning and how she started the introductions to her immediate family when he arrived.

(There is a twist in the middle of this section that I did not want to give away to the reader).

Section Two: Involves their trip to Florida. I have always wanted to tell a story about a BDSM-friendly family on a vacation trip.

Section Three: is once they get where they are going and how things go from there.

Considering readership is *LOW* for this story I have a few options:

1 - Cut bait now and write something else people will like.

2- Continue with one big story and fuck whoever doesn't like it/don't care if no one reads it.

3- Split them into three smaller stories of about a dozen chapters each.

Do you prefer serial stories of about 12 chapters or would you prefer it all in one?

If you've read "Resetting my bitch button" - should I just hang it up?

Dominions Son ๐Ÿšซ

@Eddie Davidson

Do you prefer serial stories of about 12 chapters or would you prefer it all in one?

If each section individually is going to be around novel length, As a reader, I would prefer each "section" as a separate story with the stories all grouped together in a series or universe.

Keet ๐Ÿšซ

@Eddie Davidson

If you've read "Resetting my bitch button" - should I just hang it up?

It might be because they are stroke stories. I can imagine that when 'the stroke' is done the readers want a different story for the next time, not pick up where they left.

Replies:   Eddie Davidson
Eddie Davidson ๐Ÿšซ

@Keet

I can't read a 'stroke story' that is a vignette.

It bores me shitless. Just when I fall in love with the characters they end it.

Vulgus, Mike McGifford, those authors are the kind that write stories that appeal to me.

As I said, many of my stories of 30+ chapters did well.

I guess I am leaning towards splitting them.

bk69 ๐Ÿšซ

@Eddie Davidson

Personally, I prefer to wait until a story is completely posted to read it. This includes series. So from that perspective, if the entire series is posted as a single story, that's the best approach, as I wouldn't end up reading some story and then waiting for the sequels. I lost patience with that shit because of Song of Ice and Fire (and the Wheel of Time)

It all depends on what your priority is - most possible readers, highest percentage of satisfied readers, etc.

Replies:   madnige  Vincent Berg
madnige ๐Ÿšซ
Updated:

@bk69

I lost patience with that shit because

...The War Against the Chtorr

Replies:   Mushroom
Mushroom ๐Ÿšซ

@madnige

...The War Against the Chtorr

Oh that one I know all to well!

He has only been promising that the next 2 books are "almost finished" for 27 years now. I have long ago given up expecting ever seeing the series finished.

Replies:   bk69
bk69 ๐Ÿšซ

@Mushroom

Well, it's only been a couple years since the second-last was "released to beta-readers"...

But I suspect it'll probably end up like the Wheel of Time, being completed posthumously.

Replies:   Eddie Davidson  Mushroom
Eddie Davidson ๐Ÿšซ

@bk69

Well hopefully my story won't be completed posthumously, have you been talking to my doctor or something?

Mushroom ๐Ÿšซ

@bk69

Well, it's only been a couple years since the second-last was "released to beta-readers"...

And I take that with a grain of salt the size of Mt. Everest.

Way back in 1993 I remember reading the last book he completed, and thinking "Awesome, just another year or so!" And even then he claimed the next was almost done.

And over the years he has gone through 2 or 3 new publishers, has said he has completely re-written the books at least twice, and I have pretty much given up. I actually used to run a GURPS campaign based on the series, and have pretty much figured out how the Chtorran ecology works decades ago.

***I have been a fan of this series for over 2 decades now, and am eagerly awaiting the next book (have been for over a decade now). And I also have speculations as to the origin and outcome. Mostly, the main characters have been looking for an "intelligence" behind the infestation. They believe that there is a "superior intelligence" behind it all, be it the worms, bunnymen, or something not seen yet. I bet that when it is all said and done, there is no intelligence behind it. It is simply a pattern of creatures that have been infested with the "nerve hair symbiots". And as the "infestation" expands, it adds new creatures to the invasion. And how they got to Earth is also already stated: Shambler Trees. Their seeds are able to survive Earth entry, and contain "spores" of a great many creatures. And if we loose the war, some time in the future such "seeds" would be ejected from Earth, complete with a devolved form of humans and other earth fauna, complete with red fur.***

The above written by me, circa 2007 on the Wiki Talk page about this series. Funny thing is, I actually wrote the first "major expansion" of the Wikipedia article, at about the time I wrapped my my last Chtorran campaign 2006).

I even used to correspond with him, about 20 years ago. When he told me the next book was completed and would be out the next year (that was 2000). And back then he had offers from computer game companies, movie studios, even an animated movie (not to mention the songs that had been released). Now, the property is so dead I honestly think he would be lucky if he even got a publisher anymore.

I still read them every year or so, and is sad, because the things he wrote about as "sci-fi" in the 1980's and early 1990's are now starting to slip from Sci-Fi to Sci-punk. Technology, mindsets, it would seem like the long awaited
"Chinese Democracy". Outdated and nostalgic because it took so long.

Replies:   bk69
bk69 ๐Ÿšซ

@Mushroom

a GURPS campaign

(Yeah, sorry to derail your eloquence about a favorite series, but...)

I never really met anyone who was actually into that. And I've been in campaigns for basically every White Wolf system, every edition of (A)D&D, Champions, Amber, Call of Cthulhu, Paranoia...and the discussions for a few more (like a Feng Shui campaign, or a All Flesh Must Be Eaten, or...) But GURPS just never seemed to have any popularity.
Probably a regional thing.

Replies:   Mushroom
Mushroom ๐Ÿšซ

@bk69

But GURPS just never seemed to have any popularity.
Probably a regional thing.

It is great if you want a nitch campaign. I only used it for Chtorr, because there was a rule book made for it, and the system works well in a modern era. One of the few good rules for 20-21st century settings (2003-2006 there were really none other for "modern").

And it was a lot of fun, as when I started only 2 people had read the books. And I did not go easy on them, the first time they met a worm everybody died. But after that they rebuilt and became kind of like bounty hunters, collecting samples and rewards for killing worms in the Southern Alabama - Florida Panhandle area. Kind of like Jim, if he was a mercenary and not in the Army.

Replies:   bk69
bk69 ๐Ÿšซ

@Mushroom

One of the few good rules for 20-21st century settings (2003-2006 there were really none other for "modern").

Spycraft.

Eddie Davidson ๐Ÿšซ

@bk69

Well, I've posted 20 chapters of "Resetting my bitch button" with the sections. I have 30 chapters written but 10 are in editing/still futzing with.

So far readership is about 800 per chapter. Which is steady but not great. The voting (other than a voting bomber) has been 7 or higher which is nice.

At one point the voice telling the story changes from the mother to the daughter. Do you think that may warrant a new story?
It's sort of a 6 chapter arc, because the mom is not the central focus of that part of the story but more of a background character.

Replies:   Switch Blayde
Switch Blayde ๐Ÿšซ

@Eddie Davidson

At one point the voice telling the story changes from the mother to the daughter. Do you think that may warrant a new story?

What POV are you writing in? 1st, 3rd-limited, omniscient. It makes a difference.

Changing the POV character doesn't require a new story. It's common to tell a story from multiple POVs. In fact, the majority of stories may even do that.

A story has a beginning, middle, and end. Yeah, yeah, that's obvious. But
what does that really mean?

Plot = conflict. That means the protagonist wants/needs something and the antagonist is in the way. That's why the reader keeps reading. To root for the protagonist. To find out if he will succeed. The inciting incident is what happens to cause the conflict. Set the story in motion. That's the beginning.

The middle is the story. Depending on the length, there will be min-conflicts that are resolved only to create more mini-conflicts. (A short story typically has one conflict and no sub-plots.)

When the conflict is resolved, the story ends.

So back to your question. Has the conflict been resolved or are you simply giving the reader another character's (mom) perspective? My guess is it's the latter so it's not another story. It may be a sub-plot, but the original story hasn't ended.

Replies:   bk69
bk69 ๐Ÿšซ

@Switch Blayde

Plot = conflict.

Only loosely.

Plot = challenge. Conflict is only with those instances where there's some antagonist working against the protagonist - Man V Man, Man V Society (or Man V Self, in some cases)
Man V Nature isn't gonna give conflict.

Replies:   Switch Blayde
Switch Blayde ๐Ÿšซ

@bk69

Man V Nature isn't gonna give conflict.

Did you read the book "Alive"? (Man vs Nature.)

There's also Man vs Technology nowadays.

Don't think of conflict as a war or fight. It could be a comedy like "My Best Friend's Wedding." If you want to think of it as a challenge, that's fine.

Replies:   Eddie Davidson
Eddie Davidson ๐Ÿšซ

@Switch Blayde

If anyone is so inclined and willing to provide constructive feedback I'd love it.

https://storiesonline.net/s/22921/resetting-my-bitch-button

This story does have humiliation/BDSM in it - so if that is not your bag please don't feel in any way obligated.

The story changes narrator in the third act. The third act is focused on a nudist resort that is hosting a private event for campers away from the main area. I think personally this could be a standalone story except for it happens immediately following the events of act one and act two.

I have already completed those chapters and I am finalizing them, with act 4 changing narrators again as the family heads to Walt Disney World.

I'd really like to know if you think they should be segmented as standalones?

Readership has fallen off even more - with around 350 readers of the most recent chapters. This could be more my inability to be an interesting author instead of how I've organized the story and I realize that - but it may help to get a fresh perspective if it is a contributor.

I really think the nudist resort part adds a lot to the story.

Replies:   Eddie Davidson
Eddie Davidson ๐Ÿšซ

@Eddie Davidson

The grand experiment to create a magnum opus story seems to have failed.

There are about 6,000 readers to the early chapter, 4,000 to the next and then it drastically drops off - about 400 for the final chapters.

Either I am a terrible writer or the idea of the long story did not work. It's a shame too because nudist colony stories seem to be quite popular and since that happens toward the end of the story it will seldom be read.

Replies:   bk69
bk69 ๐Ÿšซ

@Eddie Davidson

Wait until the story is complete, then check. You may get some increase from the people who don't bother with unfinished stories.
Or, you may find that the story just isn't quite long enough for some who were waiting to make a decision, or any number of other possibilities could be at play.

Vincent Berg ๐Ÿšซ

@bk69

Spycraft

Spycraft only counts if your definition of "modern" is set entirely in the 50s to early 80s. :(

Replies:   bk69
bk69 ๐Ÿšซ

@Vincent Berg

ISTR someone worked out that James Bond was a level 20 wheelman with some non-standard elements to the build. And XXX was viable too.
Fact is, while many RPGs have 'official' settings, you can usually adapt most of them to whatever setting you want. You could easily do a Urban Fantasy AD&D, or the World of Darkness in Camelot, or Champions in a galaxy far, far away. (Mage 1.5ed is a bit dated, as the computers the Virtual Adepts had would be at best high end machines now, compared to how far ahead they were in the mid 90s...)

Replies:   Vincent Berg
Vincent Berg ๐Ÿšซ

@bk69

ISTR someone worked out that James Bond was a level 20 wheelman with some non-standard elements to the build. And XXX was viable too.

My argument wasn't with role-playing games, but rather with spy tales now seem relatively nonexistent in the modern era. Modern spies are professional hackers, who seek to exploit older software in corporate sites, rather than working again national spies. It's the 'profit-model' of personal spy craft. I'm not sure how anyone would even write an intriguing story about such a boring topic. Personally, I'd rather read about large-scale coding projects, rather than private for-profit semi-government sanctioned hackers.

Vincent Berg ๐Ÿšซ

@bk69

Personally, I prefer to wait until a story is completely posted to read it. This includes series.

I've long championed this view, having starting with multiple Day-in-the-Life adventures which ultimately ended up at OVER 1 Million words (spread across 3 to 6 books).

Write your first draft, meeting it unfold naturally, keeping the stories general 'theme' and conflicts at hand, and you can easily cut the unnecessary fluff on each subsequent revision, especially as you learn more about the characters and their situation as the story unfolds (thereby allowing you to foreshadow the upcoming conflicts, with plenty of red herrings to prevent you from giving away any major plot twists.

As for series, each book must form a complete story in itself, without simply continuing the earlier story in a new book. This again means you need to focus on the themes and conflicts unique to each book, while keeping your eyes on the entire series theme and conflicts, which only unfold a little at a time. But, once you identify the key elements of each book, the rest naturally falls away, largely on it's own. By keeping your SHORT story description in front of you, you should know which details are ultimately nonessential to the plot, and which are vital.

Replies:   bk69
bk69 ๐Ÿšซ

@Vincent Berg

As for series, each book must form a complete story in itself, without simply continuing the earlier story in a new book.

Kinda.

It's reasonable for a series to be a long story. To use a trope from high fantasy, you've got your coming-of-age story of a callow youth growing into one of the greatest heroes of an era (possibly fulfilling a prophecy or at least defeating the enemy of all good living creatures). So that story continues from book to book. But each book has to be a story within that structure. Some story arc should begin and end in each book, preferably at the beginning and at the end. Otherwise, you don't really have separate books, you've got one book with multiple volumes.

Replies:   Vincent Berg
Vincent Berg ๐Ÿšซ

@bk69

Kinda.

It's reasonable for a series to be a long story.

Again, it's all in your focus. As long as each book has it's own theme (emphasis) and self-contained conflicts, while still advancing the overall series' theme/conflict, then it works. But it takes a bit of work to master how you segment each book, especially if you start with an epic length story and merely slice and dice it into individual books. Instead, it's best (IMHO) if authors consider how they divide one series into multiple books, before they write the entire thing. But, that may be asking too much from the many SOL authors who prefer epic length stories.

Again, readers typically demand a resolution at the end of each book, especially if there's a substantial delay between each 'publication'.

It took me a while before I finally mastered how to split a longer stories into separate books, and the difference is both substantial and rewarding (for readers). I started chopping a single overly long story into multiple books, multiple times, before I finally developed the knack for it. Now, it's almost second nature, but ... it requires (for me at least) writing out each book's themes and book-specific conflicts, which you use while revising to keep each book's contents specific to each book.

Joe_Bondi_Beach ๐Ÿšซ
Updated:

@Eddie Davidson

This one starts slow and as a result you can see that by chapter two readership dips to about 50% of the original chapter by the third chapter it's about 10%. That's not good. So it goes 3,000 reads on chapter one, 1500 on chapter two and about 400 or so on all subsequent chapters.

Somewhere on SOL there's a passage pointing out that the first chapter count is significantly inflated because of the way browsers preload pages.

The bad news is that there weren't as many actual readers as it appears; the good news is that the dropoff is not as significant as it may appear.

[ETA] In other words, rather than the content or length of the stor(ies) or chapters it's the mechanics of counting that accounts for the dropoff, even if content also matters.

~ JBB

bk69 ๐Ÿšซ
Updated:

Switching narrative voice is definitely a reason for a break, but most frequently it would be a new chapter. Or, if you consider the model used in Tale of Two Cities (or Jay Cantrell's "Lifeline" oe DVA or "Second Chance" by number7, etc) to have a single 'novel' with multiple 'books' inside it.

Really, the only time a story should 'end' is on a significant resolution of the plot (or of a major subplot.)

Vincent Berg ๐Ÿšซ

@Eddie Davidson

Personally, 12 chapter is NOT an 'epic' story, though that varies by how long each chapter is. But, it's always easier to spin in place, spitting out more words, even as the story doesn't advance much, so that's an obvious issue for us all.

For a long time, I wrestled with this problem myself, as it always take time for my stories to unfold. But, I finally addressed this in my last two stories (sadly, currently my least popular). Rather than wasting time setting up the back story, or presenting the lead character's status quo, I've been focusing on the specific trigger event. You can easily sprinkle the back story throughout the book, where each 'nugget' will generate more interest, as new details are easier to process than continually expanding on the one's already established in the first chapter.

In my latest book, the entire story premise rests on an unknown hallucinogenic compound, which grants users mysterious telepathic abilities to enter someone else's dream. But since that much back story bogs down soon, I interjected the main character's mysterious failed romantic relationship (his wife dumps him with no notification or explanation).

Thus, the boring background details are spiked by the mystery surrounding his undefiled past, keeping readers interested enough to whether the remaining chapters. (The story only really gets into the heart of the story conflict in chapter 4, so I slowly reveal the details of his past over the course of several chapters.) Unfortunately, since this was my first time employing that particular technique, it kinda bit me in the ass, as the flashback scenes generally paint him as a weenie loser, which hardly makes him an intriguing leading man. But, I chalk that up to my unfamiliarity with the technique, and my unintentionally biting off more than I could chew, and not quite knowing how to carry it off.

But, with any story, the key is keeping the story the size it wants to be. Note: that doesn't mean just keep plugging away, as I've long commented about relying on event-based chapters, rather than the free-flowing DITL (Day-in-the-Life) stories that one frequently finds on SOL. By focusing on the specific events, it's easier to cut through the chaff, clearing the weeds that often choke off an otherwise engaging story.

So, we really need to know whether your 12 chapters are merely really, REALLY long, or whether you're actually going somewhere with them. As such, we don't need specific plot details, but we DO need to know your basic approach to story telling (i.e. how you relate the unfolding details of your story), before we can weigh in on just how long your story truly NEEDS to be.

Again, 12 episodic chapters is NOT a complete novel, so I'm guessing that either you have a poor conception of 'chapters', or you're cramming way too much unnecessary details into each.

There ARE techniques for jumping straight into a story, regardless of the necessary back story, and they don't all focus on multiple flashback scenarios. But, we need a better idea of the issues you're dealing with in writing THIS story, before we can advice you on HOW to proceed.

Back to Top

Close
 

WARNING! ADULT CONTENT...

Storiesonline is for adult entertainment only. By accessing this site you declare that you are of legal age and that you agree with our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.


Log In