Home Β» Forum Β» Author Hangout

Forum: Author Hangout

To use an editor, or not to use an editor. That is the question.

Pixy 🚫

For some time now, I've been thinking about ascending to the next writing level and seeking help from an editor. Not just for picking out typo's but mainly for the technical side of things. Well, actually, pretty much the technical side of things.

At the moment, my editing consists mainly of reading the work aloud, and if it sounds 'wrong' then correcting the offending part till it's less 'wrong'. I read through the threads here about correct usage and when to use 'x' and when not use 'x' and when 'y' would be better etc, etc. But, to be honest, it all goes in one eyeball and out the other without actually registering with the fleshy stuff in-between.

I also have a problem with to/too usage. Over the many years I have tried to get to grips with it, but I still find it difficult to grasp.

I also have a problem with passive voice and errr 'other' voices being used out of context. Or something. I don't really understand that either.

In fact, there is a lot I don't understand. Some very knowledgeable types here go in to great detail about stuff that I don't understand, and given my time so far on this mortal realm and my inability to understand it so far, is a pretty good indicator that I never shall.

There are other issues that I also need to accept. The biggest being able to take - and act on - constructive criticism. I'm not sure how I am going to cope with that. The most obvious answer, is to try it and see…

My personal reticence is a major factor that I need to address, however, like I said, I wish to 'up my game' as it were.

My questionable ability to take instruction aside, the next really important criteria that I have, is the editor has to be competent - otherwise, what's the point? Over the years, (and I think I have mentioned this before here) I have received many offers of editing help, via messages so badly written/spelt that they have literally made my toes curl. In my mind – rightly or wrongly – when you offer your services as an editor, your message of help is basically your C.V and a demonstration of your ability to provide the service you are offering.

Which conveniently leads me to the next thing… If you require the services of an editor, then it makes sense to utilise Storiesonline's list of volunteer editors. Yes, these individuals are volunteers, so that comes with its own caveat about 'you get what you pay for' etc, etc. So I started at the top and basically, mentally red pen crossed my way down the list. The vast majority of those instantly discarded, were done so because of their poorly worded/written 'adverts'. Let's be honest here, if they can't get their spelling and punctuation right on their credentials/comment sections, then your story has no chance. It's like advertising for a chauffeur of your expensive pristine motor, and then watching potential applicants turn up in vehicles that looked like they have participated in three demolition derby's in the last week alone…

There are a few that are possibles, who I know to be good (in as much as I understand the term), however their turn-offs tend to include categories that I frequent, so that's a non-starter.

To make things harder, I would prefer a UK English editor than an American/rest-of-world-English one.

It's all a bit a chore, and I'm now thinking 'Is it worth the hassle?'. It's a hobby, not done for professional/financial gain and there is the danger that if I spend too much time 'learning' the craft, then I actually might sicken myself to the hobby, which would be, basically, counterproductive.

If at first you don't succeed, then fire-walking is not for you. Yes, I know it's normally skydiving, but that's a bit boring…

Anyway, it's been on the back-burner for a few years, percolating away with no decision in sight, so I thought that I would just 'throw it out there' to both see what happens and to see what sticks…

awnlee jawking 🚫

@Pixy

three demolition derby's

three demolition derbies ;-)

I would prefer a UK English editor than an American/rest-of-world-English one.

That's a hard ask on SOL but it needn't be a show-stopper. I've done plenty of editing and proofreading for American English authors and, despite some rough spots (me not knowing common US brands of foods, differences in phrasing etc), I believe I've contributed worthwhile improvements. It shouldn't be too difficult to find a US English editor who has a working knowledge of, and can tolerate, British English.

I suggest a suck it and see approach. Identify an editor or two with an acceptable CV and contact them. Give them a sample of your work and see whether you like their suggestions and they say 'please' and 'thank you' at the right times.

Good luck,

AJ

Replies:   Pixy
Pixy 🚫

@awnlee jawking

derbies ;-)

πŸ–• πŸ˜›

helmut_meukel 🚫

@Pixy

it all goes in one eyeball and out the other without actually registering with the fleshy stuff in-between.

Probable cause: No fleshy stuff there! ;-)

Sorry, couldn't resist.

HM.

Replies:   Pixy
Pixy 🚫

@helmut_meukel

πŸ–• πŸ˜› πŸ–•

Switch Blayde 🚫
Updated:

@Pixy

my inability to understand it so far, is a pretty good indicator that I never shall.

Don't sell yourself short. Your post is already taking the first step. The question is, what is your commitment? What are your goals?

As I've said many times, my first novel was rejected with the feedback: "Show don't tell and don't head-hop." I had no idea what those terms meant. It was my curiosity rather than trying to improve my writing that made me Google the terms.

I read article after article. Some good, some not. And in the articles other terms were brought up that I wasn't familiar with, like passive voice and POV. So I went back to Google and read more articles. And of course I ended up learning about punctuation, grammar, and style guides.

When I got to the point that I actually thought I understood how to write fiction, I read two books on it. One great; one awful.

Do I understand it all? Nope. Can I do it right? Nope. I was even thinking of taking creative writing classes at a local university but I ruled that out.

So don't say that you never will. Even if you don't master itβ€”and who does?β€”you will learn. And then it's up to your commitment as to how you apply it. Also, and I'm saying this from experience, it sort of becomes more work and less funβ€” but more satisfying.

Replies:   helmut_meukel
helmut_meukel 🚫

@Switch Blayde

I was even thinking of taking creative writing courses at a local university but I ruled that out

I'm always wondering who teaches there? If they are able to do it, why are they teaching instead of writing bestsellers? A successful bestseller author should make more per year than a college teacher.

HM.

Dominions Son 🚫

@helmut_meukel

I'm always wondering who teaches there? If they are able to do it, why are they teaching instead of writing bestsellers

In the US we have a saying: "Those who can, do, those who can't, teach."

StarFleet Carl 🚫

@Dominions Son

In the US we have a saying: "Those who can, do, those who can't, teach."

As I learned from my ex-brother-in-law: "Those who can't teach, become school administrators."

Replies:   Dominions Son
Dominions Son 🚫

@StarFleet Carl

:-)

solreader50 🚫

@Dominions Son

"Those who can, do, those who can't, teach."

Strangely this phrase came up at our dinner table this evening, and there is more than a grain of truth in it.

But at the same time it is grossly unfair to the many dedicated teachers who are trying to impart learning to our unwilling brats all around the world.

Margaret Atwood says she is/was a teacher. Richard Powers is a prof at Stanford. And didn't Stephen King only become an author because he couldn't find a job as a teacher. I'm sure I could find examples of artists and musicians. Indeed one of my schoolmates from so many years ago was an accomplished jazz saxophonist. But he taught because his brand of jazz was never going to be commercial enough to support him.

The case for the defence rests, m'lud.

Replies:   Switch Blayde
Switch Blayde 🚫

@solreader50

And didn't Stephen King only become an author because he couldn't find a job as a teacher.

I thought he was a teacher.

awnlee jawking 🚫

@helmut_meukel

I've noticed something of a trend that the best football managers used to be defenders and mediocre defenders at that. Perhaps the same applies to writing, in which case a great writer should generally make a poor teacher.

If someone has the creative spark and churns out the regulation three best-selling novels a year, when do they have the time to go on courses to learn about third person limited distant versus third person limited deep?

AJ

Switch Blayde 🚫

@helmut_meukel

If they are able to do it, why are they teaching instead of writing bestsellers?

David Merrill was an English professor at the University of Iowa. In 1972, his first novel, "First Blood," was published (that Rambo guy). He didn't give up his tenure at the university until 1986 in order to write full-time. So he was still teaching while a best-selling author.

Kurt Vonnegut was an instructor at the famous Iowa Writer's Workshop.

And so on…

Pixy 🚫

@Pixy

I was even thinking of taking creative writing courses at a local university but I ruled that out.

I have considered this many times over the last decade and never acted upon it as I was a workaholic and my job could (and often did) require my presence at all hours of the day. So it seemed pointless to enroll in evening classes when the chances of me actually making them were very slim. Plus I had very little free time to write, so making assignments would have been nigh impossible.

That was then, this is now, so I might actually look into that avenue again, see what's available.

Replies:   Switch Blayde
Switch Blayde 🚫

@Pixy

never acted upon it as I was a workaholic and my job could (and often did) require my presence at all hours of the day.

I was retired so I had the time. I was thinking it would be nice to be in a class with all those young coeds, but then I was thinking I'd be the old coot in the class.

NC-Retired 🚫

@Pixy

I've been retired for a decade. Do not miss the pressure of the workload as a technical writer & illustrator. But I did have a wonderful, very strict editor. I learned a lot from Debra.

Here on SOL I thought I'd 'help out' some authors and volunteered as an editor.

Several took me up on the offer. But the collaborations died when they refused to accept 'constructive criticism'. So I stopped offering.

Pixy... or any others that want an editor to help them will need to think long and hard on their mental state and willingness to accept editorial changes.

I'd suggest being prepared to be pissed off from time to time when your editor says that doesn't make sense, yet when you read it aloud, it does to your mind.

I'd also suggest that if you find someone you can work with that you set up video chats so you can better understand each other. My experience was that email was simply inadequate.

Cheers!

Replies:   Pixy  JoeBobMack  Fanlon
Pixy 🚫

@NC-Retired

Good points, thanks. And I definitely need to think about and change my attitude, reference editorial changes. And I need to find someone with an ability to work for the mentally impaired, because they are going to need to couch everything in a way your average child can understand.

JoeBobMack 🚫

@NC-Retired

Pixy... or any others that want an editor to help them will need to think long and hard on their mental state and willingness to accept editorial changes.

Curiosity is a valuable character strength! It's hard to be offended when one is thinking,"I wonder why that passage comes across to my editor that way? Would readers understand it the same way my editor does? How could I re-word it so that my intent is more often the result?"

And that's just for sentences! It's harder to accept criticism of characters. "What do you mean that character is two-dimensional. She's completely real in my mind, and wonderful. Just wonderful, I tell you!" Of course, that's in the author's mind. Being curious whether you actually got that on paper can help take such criticism and let it make the story better.

Fanlon 🚫

@NC-Retired

Well said. If you genuinely want to get better, you go in with an open mind. That becomes obvious quickly once the red ink starts flying. Having a good relationship with your team or editor is crucial. There has to be a respect taken at face value for it to work out the way you both hope. Authors have to remember the editor wants the story to be just as good as you do.

The one big problem I had when I first tried to write something was what I saw in my head, was not always what was on the page. To make matters worse, when I tried to edit my own stuff, I would skim right over sentences because I knew in my mind what it was supposed to say. Not that it actually said that on the page. Long story short, I would remember what the scene was instead of actually reading it.

Getting an editor/proofreader or 10 of each is always a good idea. There is never a time in my mind where that isn't smart. The more you go through that process, the more you will learn as a writer. At least that's how it's been in my experience.

Now I am just rambling... sorry.
Fanlon

richardshagrin 🚫

@Pixy

two-dimensional.

Male characters need a height and a penis length. Two dimensions. Female characters need something like 36-24-34 to indicate breast, waist and hip size. Three dimensions. Well on SOL they need the dimension of age, at least 14 years old. Other measurements are optional.

Replies:   Pixy
Pixy 🚫

@richardshagrin

Technically you are wrong. You forgot about girth, which is very important. So that would make it height, and length and girth of penis; three dimensions.

Replies:   awnlee jawking
awnlee jawking 🚫

@Pixy

Technically you are wrong. You forgot about time, which is very important (length of time maintaining an erection during penetrative sex, and shortness of refractory period). So that would make it height, length and girth of penis plus time; four dimensions ;-)

AJ

Replies:   Keet
Keet 🚫

@awnlee jawking

So that would make it height, length and girth of penis plus time; four dimensions ;-)

You forgot the rigidity factor. Five dimensions ;)

NC-Retired 🚫

@Pixy

Pixy... Your comments on the Halloween thread brought another thought to mind. In that thread you mentioned that several of the stories had tags about incest.

For me, incest is not an attractive theme. I'd have a difficult time being objective were I the editor for an author that wrote about that, no matter how good the story is otherwise.

I'd suggest that your chosen editor should also like the story genre that you are writing, whatever it is.

As always, YMMV.

Cheers!

Replies:   Pixy  tendertouch
Pixy 🚫

@NC-Retired

That is an understandable situation. Though I wouldn't ask an editor to work on a story that contains content they have issues with. Hell, I have a story about tentacle sex waiting in the wings, ready to be dropped on the un-suspecting masses in two weeks when a certain thing has run it's course here.... LOL

tendertouch 🚫

@NC-Retired

Folks, whatever you do, don't lie to a volunteer editor about the contents of a story that you want them to look at.

I used to do some proofreading here (it's a lot easier to see other's mistakes than your own!) and I was contacted by an author to look at a story. He told me what it was about and that sounded okay.

Then I went and took a look at his other stories. He may have had one story at the time that wasn't about cheating but I don't think so and he said in his profile that's what he wrote about. My editor profile specifically ruled that out so I asked him about it.

"No, no, there's no cheating in this story. Really!"

I shouldn't have listened to him. The entire story revolved around a wife cheating on her husband. Even when I pointed it out in the story he continued to say that the story wasn't about cheating!

akarge 🚫

@Pixy

I also have a problem with to/too usage

The easy way to correctly use to vs too is to always use to, except when there is MORE involved. Too has MORE Os than to. Use that to remember that too means more, or also, or additional.

kinkbugz 🚫

@Pixy

I think it really depends on what you want. There's the technical side of editing like grammar, spelling, proper word usages (bare vs bear), and there's the concept side of editing like plot holes, unfired Chekhov guns, weird red herrings, inconsistencies etc.

I don't really use editors for my wank-stories cause I'm putting in the bare minimum, I'm not earning any money for it, and frankly, people who wanna wank to it will find a way. (And then comes the post-nut clarity)

But for paid articles + fiction, working on my portfolio etc. I think it's always a good idea to get an editor.

For the technical side, like you said, you're really getting what you paid for. If the editors are free, well then don't expect the best. On the other hand, if you pay someone to edit, then they're supposed to do it well regardless of the content. I've edited shit that I did not like at all but I just powered through cause... capitalism. If it helps... Grammarly and I think Pro-writing Aid? Or was it Quillbot? They both help to catch UK VS USA spelling and term usage.

The concept side can be a bit more tricky. Genre standards of pacing and expectations are all different. But like I think most developmental editors can help you to spot plot holes and improve flow.

Reading well-edited fiction or articles can help. They show you want you should be doing, and what are the current existing standards. Also, I find that listening to critiques of existing fiction wrt plot points, character development etc also helps at times.

Some editors do one or the other, some do both.

I once read a story that had a 2 page description of the MC's house as if it would be a major plot point. It wasn't. The rest of the story was about disappointment and family issues. The house was never brought up again. Like... literally the MC never even went back. Plot wise, it really would have done so much better without the weird ass 2 page desc of a house that serves no purpose. But the writer was technically proficient. Perfect grammar, spelling everything. Just I guess... too invested in home decor.

Tl;Dr: You can use some software to catch UK Vs USA spelling /term usage. Good editors usually are the paid kind. πŸ˜…

Back to Top

Close
 

WARNING! ADULT CONTENT...

Storiesonline is for adult entertainment only. By accessing this site you declare that you are of legal age and that you agree with our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.