Home « Forum « Story Ideas

Forum: Story Ideas

Warning - Politically Extremely Incorrect!

awnlee jawking

This idea was prompted by the discussions on story tags.

Fraternal twins, one a white, blonde-haired blue-eyed cheerleader, the other a hunky black footballer, go to a school in which the cliques are divided along racial lines. After bemoaning the quality of their dates to each other, the girl sets up her brother with a succession of cheerleaders while the boy sets up his sister with his footballing colleagues.

Cue lots of 8" black cocks plundering tight little white cheerleader pussy.

AJ

John Demille

@awnlee jawking

I think you're not up-to-date on the latest trends in political correctness.

Currently, it's very politically correct and very desirables to cuckold/degrade white men (who we're told have all the privileges and hold all the power). So the blonde cheerleader girl setting her black brother with other blonde cheerleaders and him setting her up with his black football buddies is the way it needs to be according to the latest SJW/Intersectional feminism standards.

If you had said that she was the black one and he was the blonde one, and he's set up with other black cheerleader friends and she gets set up with other blonde football players, then you would be encouraging something very politically incorrect.

Get with the times people. Geez, how hard would that be...

Replies:   paliden  Bondi Beach  posidous
paliden

@John Demille

the latest SJW/Intersectional feminism standards


What the hell is SJW/Intersectional feminism?

Replies:   John Demille
John Demille

@paliden

What the hell is SJW/Intersectional feminism?


The following is an explanation that might seem ridiculous to any sane person, and you will be fully forgiven for thinking that I might be either joking or being silly or making stuff up. But this is how it actually is right now in the western civilized world's academia.

SJW: Social Justice Warrior (leftist who go all out to help "oppressed" people).

Intersectional feminism is a system of recognizing various level of 'Oppression'.

Example:

1 - Being a woman means you're "oppressed" by men, thus you get one point of oppression.

2 - Being Black means you're "oppressed" by whites, thus you get one point of oppression.

3 - Being Disabled means you're "oppressed" by able bodied people, thus you get one point of oppression.

4 - Being Transgender means you're "oppressed" by CIS gendered people (normal people who feel as they're born, so if you're born with a penis and you feel like a man on the inside then you're a cis-gendered male), thus you get one point of oppression.

5 - Being Muslim means you're "oppressed" by the west somehow, thus you get one point of oppression.

6 - Being Obese means you're "oppressed" by non-obese, thus you get one point of oppression.

Being drug addicted, or ugly, short, have allergies etc... grant you points.

You combine these to accumulate points of oppression in the oppression olympics and the more points you have, the more oppressed you are, and the more in need of help and respect you are.

So, in a conference of feminists, the one that can speak with the most authority is the one with the highest points.

So, a white man is below white women on this scale of oppression. A white woman is less than a black woman etc....

So an obese black muslim disabled transgendered woman can shut everybody up and speak from position of authority and it would be anybody else's duty to listen to her, believe and respect her.

The most privileged is a able-bodied cis-gendered white business man. Such men have to always apologize for their own privilege and can never ever argue with anybody except other white men. If a woman speak, a man is supposed to simply agree with her and apologize for his oppressive privilege.

To SJWs when Trump says 'Hello' to Hilary he's being an oppressive shit-lord.

This system reverses the social norms on their head. So to be respectable and revered, you don't work hard and become a better person. You have to be the weakest person that you could possibly be.

sejintenej

@John Demille

The most privileged is a able-bodied cis-gendered white business man. Such men have to always apologize for their own privilege and can never ever argue with anybody except other white men. If a woman speak, a man is supposed to simply agree with her and apologize for his oppressive privilege.

Hardly: he is the one oppressed by money-demanding politicians, black people for being white, whites for working hard, whites for not being black, his neighbours for having a better car, the police for not having a crime sheet, the churches for not giving everything to the greedy not-so-poor.

The one who likes being oppressed is the street corner beggar - some of them over here make far more than mid (or even high) level bankers (but I can't mention them without starting the word with a w)

My neighbour (white, female, mother, still married) reckons she is oppressed for a unique reason. She is forcing herself to fly to a hell she dislikes (aka Los Angeles). Never been there so can't comment

Bondi Beach
Updated:

@John Demille


Currently, it's very politically correct and very desirables to cuckold/degrade white men (who we're told have all the privileges and hold all the power). So the blonde cheerleader girl setting her black brother with other blonde cheerleaders and him setting her up with his black football buddies is the way it needs to be according to the latest SJW/Intersectional feminism standards.


To get the full politically incorrect effect wouldn't you have to have the privileged white guys fuck all the women of color at the next all-faculty meeting?

After all, having the black guys fuck white chicks is really kind of a tired trope, albeit a very popular one.

Oh, hey, here's one even better: have the privileged white guys fuck faculty men of color at the faculty meeting. How's that? You'd get a twofer: more white male privilege AND a super-squick bonus (for some) of M/M.

bb

paliden

@John Demille

Well I fell for that hook, line, and sinker. I Should have known better that to ask.

Replies:   John Demille
John Demille
Updated:

@paliden

So you thought that I was joking, didn't you?

Check this link. This is from today, and no, it's not the onion:

http://acculturated.com/do-men-need-safe-spaces/

They're trying to feminize American white males.

Again, this is totally serious.

Replies:   Bondi Beach  Jim S
Bondi Beach

@John Demille

http://acculturated.com/do-men-need-safe-spaces/


Perhaps these are needed. After all, bars are co-ed, and as we know what's said in a locker room or in locker-room-style no longer stays in the locker room. Plus, golf isn't for everyone.

bb

richardshagrin

@awnlee jawking

tight little white cheerleader pussy.

I am pretty sure its all pink.

Replies:   awnlee jawking
awnlee jawking

@richardshagrin

Joking aside that's an interesting nit. I guess hyphenating white and cheerleader would work but it looks clumsy. How would others avoid this ambiguity?

AJ

Replies:   richardshagrin
richardshagrin

@awnlee jawking

Maybe "tight little white-girl cheerleader pussy"? Or maybe "Caucasian" instead of white girl? There are a few male cheerleaders, although sometimes they are called yell leaders for reasons that escape me. At least at the University of Washington. Sometimes their organization is called "Sun Dodgers" which used to be the nickname of the university sports teams before they became Huskies. Apparently the Chamber of Commerce didn't like the idea of Seattle having so little sun you had to dodge it. I suppose Rain Dodgers would have been even worst. The former Brooklyn Dodgers were originally the Trolley Dodgers. Get out of Dodge!

Replies:   Bondi Beach
Bondi Beach

@richardshagrin

sometimes they are called yell leaders


Or "pep boys"* as my father, who was one back in the day, used to say.

*Also the name of an auto repair chain.

bb

Crumbly Writer

@John Demille

So an obese black muslim disabled transgendered woman can shut everybody up and speak from position of authority and it would be anybody else's duty to listen to her, believe and respect her.

Except, according to your analysis, such a person would be on the news daily, heralded by everyone. Instead, they're generally reviled, attacked and intimidated.

Yes, there's an effort to 'reach out' and include them, but it's largely an empty gesture, as the same people 'reaching out' aren't there when they run into trouble.

@sejintenej

the police for not having a crime sheet

Plenty of police have quite a list of criminal activities, however, the police in general tend to look the other way and excuse anything other cops might do wrong.

Jim S

@John Demille

They're trying to feminize American white males.


Modern feminists consider males to be defective females. Hence their weird philosophy.

And why do they consider males to be defective females? I remember reading a screed years ago that claimed all embryos are conceived female and half turn to being male, i.e. male genitalia start out female. Maybe that provides some of their justification for abortion -- half of all embryos will end up defective so there is only a 50-50 chance of getting it wrong [/sarc]

Replies:   awnlee jawking  Not_a_ID
awnlee jawking

@Jim S

Adam was Homo sapiens 1.0. Eve was Homo sapiens 1.1 :)

AJ

Replies:   awnlee jawking
Not_a_ID

@Jim S

And why do they consider males to be defective females? I remember reading a screed years ago that claimed all embryos are conceived female and half turn to being male, i.e. male genitalia start out female.


That also is a prevailing view for accounting non-chromosomal matched males and females. It also does match known fetal development patterns up to week 6 of pregnancy. In the case of such a mis-match happening, exceedingly rare as they are, it typically is the result of either a hormonal imbalance, or genetic triggers typically tied to the X chromosome which then influences the fetal development as the "switch" either fails to be thrown(XY baby born female, or otherwise born in varying states of androgeny that persist through adulthood as their physical "femaleness" is the result of a genetic resistance to androgens causing them to "default" towards female), accidentally thrown(XX baby born "male"; extremely rare only 4 or 5 in 100,000; and going by wiki, seems to normally be genetic in basis, and determined by one gene in particular), or some other variation of an intersexed baby.

Replies:   Lugh
awnlee jawking

@awnlee jawking

Kim Kardashian is Microsoft Homo Sapiens 200000.62751.12
Donald Trump is Apple Homo sapiens 6000.1

AJ

posidous

@John Demille

Now if you want to suggest a story you have to be politically correct. Well, I got news for you, there a whole lot of us fed up with PC. To us, PC stands for a pissing contest.

I just read that a college on the east coast is banning such phrases as "hey guys" it must be " hey, people". Next, they will require all communications be via text messages, so can redact. WHEEE! here comes "1984"

Replies:   Jim S
Jim S

@posidous

WHEEE! here comes "1984"


I think Orwell overestimated the speed of dissolution of individual freedom. It should have been titled "2084"

Not_a_ID

Well, he was close to the mark in regards to the technical capability to do what he outlined in 1984.

He missed the mark on the social side. But as the commentary is for free societies, they'll always be only one generation away from total collapse.

So for a story written in 1948, the choice of year was sufficiently apt. His MC would be a member of the "first generation" being born to children alive at the time of publication for his book. In other words, a prospective (great-)grandchild of any any adult reading it at the time of publication.

Lugh

@Not_a_ID

varying states of androgeny that persist through adulthood as their physical "femaleness" is the result of a genetic resistance to androgens causing them to "default" towards female),


Sounds like the family of genetically determined partial to complete androgen insensitivity syndromes. Around gestational week 7*, the mother secretes a burst of male hormones (androgens). In a process called Mullerian differentiation, the great majority of XY fetuses (genotypically male) respond to this and start forming male genitalia, producing a male phenotype.

My mother was a school/psychiatric social worker, who, in the early sixties, was among the first to deal with intersex states -- a term I prefer to what some groups consider politically correct, without, at least for genetically influenced conditions, using more precise terminology. Still, I grew up around people with nonbinary gender/sexuality.

Something that I've run across in some serious forums might work for a story. Mr. and Mrs. Jones are both lovely and loving people, who met as high school athletes. They had a wonderful religious wedding.

After a while, frustrated at her not getting pregnant, they went to a fertility clinic, which did a genetic workup. "Mrs. Jones, I don't have a good way to say this, but you are genotypically male (XY), with either absent or poorly developed internal female organs. In your particular form of androgen insensitivity syndrome, as you demonstrate, one can appear as a beautiful woman. Didn't you wonder, in adolescence, that you had no periods?"

"Everyone thought that was due to my low body fat as an athlete."

*Same week in which arm buds start to develop, thus the first week in which the fetus could attempt the right to bear arms.

gruntsgt

@ awnlee jawking

Adam was Homo sapiens 1.0. Eve was Homo sapiens 1.1 :)

If you ever want to piss a woman off, ask for your rib back!! LOL

Replies:   Lugh
Lugh

@gruntsgt

Adam was Homo sapiens 1.0. Eve was Homo sapiens 1.1 :)


Adam & Eve simply got into trouble for violating the Apple End User License Agreement.

Replies:   Ernest Bywater
Ernest Bywater

@Lugh

Adam & Eve simply got into trouble for violating the Apple End User License Agreement.


Funny, but it fails on fact, because the designation of an apple as the fruit was a medieval addition to the story. Also, apples aren't from where Paradise is said to be located in the middle east.

Replies:   Crumbly Writer
Crumbly Writer

@Ernest Bywater

Funny, but it fails on fact, because the designation of an apple as the fruit was a medieval addition to the story. Also, apples aren't from where Paradise is said to be located in the middle east.

The apple works better (bright red, large and overflowing with fluid) as a metaphor for 'forbidden knowledge', rather than a small brown date. :)

Replies:   Dominions Son
richardshagrin

Are writers here accusing adam and eve of dating?

Replies:   awnlee jawking
Dominions Son

@Crumbly Writer

The apple works better (bright red, large and overflowing with fluid) as a metaphor for 'forbidden knowledge', rather than a small brown date. :)


Actually, there is another fruit that is red, similar in shape to an apple and was well known in the right area of the world in ancient times, the pomegranate.

awnlee jawking

@richardshagrin

I've postulated that Eve was Adam's daughter, using the alternative translation of 'baculum' instead of 'rib' - Adam's erection went down (post-coitus) and Eve was the result.

TMI? :)

AJ

Replies:   REP  Capt Zapp
REP

@awnlee jawking

I've postulated that Eve was Adam's daughter


Which also means their children were the result of an incestuous relationship. :)

Capt Zapp

@awnlee jawking

I've postulated that Eve was Adam's daughter...


With whom?

Replies:   awnlee jawking
awnlee jawking

@Capt Zapp

With one of Adam's previous sex partners, one of the other people who had to have been around for subsequent parts of the Bible to be possible?

(I'm speaking from ignorance because I haven't read the Bible myself, but several SOL stories have mentioned there had to have been other people around at the time.)

AJ

Replies:   Dominions Son
richardshagrin

Some of this is getting close to the ever popular question, the chicken or the egg? As I remember if you believe in evolution, the egg was first, with its different genes altered by evolutionary change(s). The egg of a different type of animal hatched into the new Chicken, first of its type. If the chicken is first, that's like God creating a new species.

I hope some of this helps decide if Adam had help creating Eve. Evolutionist would say yes. Creationists think God can do anything, except possibly make something so heavy he can't move it.

Replies:   REP
Dominions Son

@awnlee jawking

With one of Adam's previous sex partners, one of the other people who had to have been around for subsequent parts of the Bible to be possible?


You won't find this in either the Bible or the Tora(not sure of the spelling).

Per Jewish mythology, Adam had a wife before Eve, Lilith. Lilith was created in the same manner as Adam to be Adam's wife, but she refused to submit to Adam and was cast out. Lilith joined with Satan as his bride and became the mother of demons.

Replies:   Ernest Bywater
Ernest Bywater

@Dominions Son

You won't find this in either the Bible or the Tora(not sure of the spelling).


Since the Old Testament of the Bible is taken from the Torah, then anything not in the Torah won't make it through to the Bible, unless it was inserted by later scribes. The same applies to the Qu'ran because its core text was taken from the Torah.

REP

@richardshagrin

I hope some of this helps decide if Adam had help creating Eve


I consider Genesis to be a myth that someone created to explain how the Earth came into being.

From what I recall of creation story in Genesis, God made Eve from one of Adam's ribs. So it was God not Adam who created Eve.

There is no mention of other people in Genesis' timeline prior to Eve giving birth to her sons. Although, the bible does make mention of her sons having wives, so Eve had some unmentioned daughters or there were other people.

Replies:   Ernest Bywater
Ernest Bywater

@REP

so Eve had some unmentioned daughters or there were other people.


There had to be other people because Genesis talks of the Sons of God taking the Daughters of Man as their wives. Thus what we are today are hybrids.

Replies:   REP
REP
Updated:

@Ernest Bywater

like I said, I don't recall all of Genesis. In fact, what I did read seemed so unreal to me that I quit reading after a couple of pages.

If it hadn't been for other factors, I would have 1-bombed the bible. :)

edited to add: I actually consider the bible to be a good road map for someone to live their lives by.

richardshagrin

I am not sure the bible is easily compared to a road map. Maybe an atlas of lots of different territories, each with roads. Somehow we get out of the bible that there should be one man and one wife, although most of the named characters seem to have had several wives, or at least concubines or servants who had children by them. Or why some of the churches decided that the religious bureaucracy (priests, bishops, arch bishops, cardinals, pope but not deacons) should not be married at all. Maybe I left out monks and abbots? Or nuns? Something about being better to marry than to burn, unless you might leave your wealth to children instead of the church.

Its possible what Jesus preached might be a good road map, although giving all your wealth to the poor and not worrying about the future has a certain unrealism in how we live today. The Bible has a lot more information than just Jesus. I think there may be some contradictions in some of the rules. I'd hate to have to give up bacon, ham and pork chops.

Replies:   Ernest Bywater  REP
Ernest Bywater

@richardshagrin

Somehow we get out of the bible that there should be one man and one wife, although most of the named characters seem to have had several wives, or at least concubines or servants who had children by them. Or why some of the churches decided that the religious bureaucracy (priests, bishops, arch bishops, cardinals, pope but not deacons) should not be married at all.


If you go by the Bible itself then all priests etc. are required to be married with kids (read Timothy) and for the general people they should have as many wives as they can suitably afford, thus richer folk have multiple wives. However, in the 6th or 7th century ( I forget which) a particular Pope issued an edict for priest etc to be bachelors so they could devote more of their time to gathering valuables for the church and sending more up the chain. Until then they were usually married with a family they spent half the day looking after and raised their own food. When the edict came out any priest with a wish for higher office had to divorce their wives because married priests weren't being considered for any promotions then.

REP

@richardshagrin

Open up a map. Pick a point as your current location, and a second point as your desired destination. You can reach that destination by many routes. The map does not control the route you choose, it only displays the possible routes.

If by some chance you make a wrong turn, the map also shows you how to change your direction so you will reach your destination.

richardshagrin

It is said "all roads lead to Rome." However there are very few that lead to Nome (Alaska). You can't get there from here has a ring of truth, in some circumstances. Like any of my birthdays earlier than the 72nd, which is about a month away. Can you show me a map leading to an acceptable presidential candidate with a reasonable chance to win?

Ernest Bywater

@richardshagrin

Can you show me a map leading to an acceptable presidential candidate with a reasonable chance to win?


Yes, but not in the USA election!

Not_a_ID

I'm sure we could find someone reasonable seeking the office of President for some town's Bridge Club.

Dominions Son

@richardshagrin

Can you show me a map leading to an acceptable presidential candidate with a reasonable chance to win?


I can sho you a map to an acceptable presidential candidate or a map to a presidential candidate with a reasonable chance to win.

However, these two candidates have not been in the same location at the same time for over 100 years.

Replies:   Not_a_ID
Not_a_ID

@Dominions Son

However, these two candidates have not been in the same location at the same time for over 100 years.


While not a fan of their politics, I am a fan of the name for the "Know Nothing" Party. It would almost be an appropriate party banner for Trump this cycle.

Replies:   Jim S
Jim S

@Not_a_ID

While not a fan of their politics, I am a fan of the name for the "Know Nothing" Party.


Roosevelt's (Teddy) Bull Moose Party is way up there as one of my favorites. But just the name.

richardshagrin

The Whigs give me a picture of men wearing false hair. Of course English Lawyers (Barristers) do so as part of going to court. And wearing robes. Imported robes from France are Robespierre.

Back to Top